IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i8p1617-d1218580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artefacts in Field Trial Research—Lateral Ammonia Fluxes Confound Fertiliser Plot Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Karin S. Levin

    (Chair of Organic Agriculture and Agronomy, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Felizitas Winkhart

    (Chair of Organic Agriculture and Agronomy, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen

    (Chair of Organic Agriculture and Agronomy, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Hans Jürgen Reents

    (Chair of Organic Agriculture and Agronomy, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Karl Auerswald

    (Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Technical University of Munich, Mühlenweg 22, 85354 Freising, Germany)

Abstract

Agricultural ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions can have serious environmental impacts, lower fertiliser nitrogen-use efficiencies, and cause economic losses. NH 3 losses may not only occur directly from organic fertilisers such as biogas digestates when applied to crops, the crops themselves may also be a source of ammonia emissions. Wheat yields from 14 years of an organic small plot fertiliser trial fertilised with biogas digestate were analysed to determine if there was significant lateral N transfer between plots. A simple NH 3 loss/gain model was developed to calculate possible N gains and losses via NH 3 volatilisation from the applied digestate. This model was tested using NH 3 volatilisation measurements. In addition, 15 N isotope measurements of crop biomass were used to analyse plant N uptake. While digestate fertilisation increased wheat yields, yield patterns indicated that NH 3 emissions from plots fertilised with biogas digestate affected yields in neighbouring unfertilised plots. Measurements of ammonia losses and gains in the field validated our modelling results, showing that 55% of digestate NH 4 + -N was volatilised. 15 N isotope analysis indicated that crops took up as much as 30 kg ha −1 NH 3 -N volatilised from digestate, and that plots closer to fertilised plots took up more of this NH 3 -N than crops further away from fertilised plots. Our results imply that neither the results from the fertilised plots nor from the unfertilised plots are without bias. To avoid inadvertently introducing artefacts into fertiliser field trials, plot sizes need to be increased and treatments situated further apart.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin S. Levin & Felizitas Winkhart & Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen & Hans Jürgen Reents & Karl Auerswald, 2023. "Artefacts in Field Trial Research—Lateral Ammonia Fluxes Confound Fertiliser Plot Experiments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1617-:d:1218580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vos, Cora & Rösemann, Claus & Haenel, Hans-Dieter & Dämmgen, Ulrich & Döring, Ulrike & Wulf, Sebastian & Eurich-Menden, Brigitte & Freibauer, Annette & Döhler, Helmut & Schreiner, Carsten & Osterburg,, 2022. "Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German agriculture 1990–2020 : report on methods and data (RMD) submission 2022," Thünen Report 320067, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Abubaker, J. & Risberg, K. & Pell, M., 2012. "Biogas residues as fertilisers – Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 126-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils Carsten Thomas Ellersiek & Hans-Werner Olfs, . "Lessons learnt from the use of passive samplers to measure ammonia emissions in multi-plot experiments," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Moestedt & Sören Nilsson Påledal & Anna Schnürer & Erik Nordell, 2013. "Biogas Production from Thin Stillage on an Industrial Scale—Experience and Optimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Kerstin Nielsen & Christina-Luise Roß & Marieke Hoffmann & Andreas Muskolus & Frank Ellmer & Timo Kautz, 2020. "The Chemical Composition of Biogas Digestates Determines Their Effect on Soil Microbial Activity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Al Afif, Rafat & Linke, Bernd, 2019. "Biogas production from three-phase olive mill solid waste in lab-scale continuously stirred tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1046-1052.
    4. Franco Curadelli & Marcelo Alberto & Ernesto Martín Uliarte & Mariana Combina & Iván Funes-Pinter, 2023. "Meta-Analysis of Yields of Crops Fertilized with Compost Tea and Anaerobic Digestate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Wenyan Chen & Qiang Cai & Yuan Zhao & Guojuan Zheng & Yuting Liang, 2014. "Toxicity Evaluation of Pig Slurry Using Luminescent Bacteria and Zebrafish," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Jacek Pranagal & Sławomir Ligęza & Halina Smal & Joanna Gmitrowicz-Iwan, 2023. "Effects of Waste Application (Carboniferous Rock and Post-Fermentation Sludge) on Soil Quality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    8. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    9. Irina N. Vikhareva & Guliya K. Aminova & Aliya K. Mazitova, 2022. "Resource Cycling: Application of Anaerobic Utilization Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Begum, Sameena & Ahuja, Shruti & Anupoju, Gangagni Rao & Kuruti, Kranti & Juntupally, Sudharshan & Gandu, Bharath & Ahuja, D.K., 2017. "Process intensification with inline pre and post processing mechanism for valorization of poultry litter through high rate biomethanation technology: A full scale experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 428-436.
    11. Magdalena Kachel & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Alaa Subr & Stanisław Parafiniuk & Artur Przywara & Milan Koszel & Grzegorz Zając, 2020. "Impact of the Type of Fertilization and the Addition of Glycerol on the Quality of Spring Rape Straw Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Sunil Prasad Lohani & Martina Keitsch & Siddhartha Shakya & David Fulford, 2021. "Waste to energy in Kathmandu Nepal—A way toward achieving sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 906-914, September.
    13. Wu Jichengab & Pan Xiaoyingab & Yang Yonghuiab & Gao Cuiminab & Wang Yueab & Li Minjieac & Wu Jichengab & Pan Xiaoyingab & Yang Yonghuiab & Gao Cuiminab & Wang Yueab & Li Minjieac, 2020. "Effects of Biogas Slurry Utilization in Long-Term on Soil Nutrients and Enzyme Activities," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 8(2), pages 1083-1090, February.
    14. Jiří Velechovský & Matěj Malík & Lukáš Kaplan & Pavel Tlustoš, 2021. "Application of Individual Digestate Forms for the Improvement of Hemp Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Alvyra Slepetiene & Mykola Kochiieru & Aida Skersiene & Audrone Mankeviciene & Olgirda Belova, 2022. "Changes in Stabile Organic Carbon in Differently Managed Fluvisol Treated by Two Types of Anaerobic Digestate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    16. Ortner, Markus & Rachbauer, Lydia & Somitsch, Walter & Fuchs, Werner, 2014. "Can bioavailability of trace nutrients be measured in anaerobic digestion?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 190-198.
    17. Hastik, Richard & Basso, Stefano & Geitner, Clemens & Haida, Christin & Poljanec, Aleš & Portaccio, Alessia & Vrščaj, Borut & Walzer, Chris, 2015. "Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 608-623.
    18. Godwin Glivin & S. Joseph Sekhar, 2016. "Experimental and Analytical Studies on the Utilization of Biowastes Available in an Educational Institution in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
    19. Shaohui Zhang & Yumei Hua & Liangwei Deng, 2016. "Nutrient Status and Contamination Risks from Digested Pig Slurry Applied on a Vegetable Crops Field," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    20. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Fiala, Marco & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Lema, Juan M. & Moreira, María Teresa, 2014. "Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 625-635.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1617-:d:1218580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.