IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i6p244-d375790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Chemical Composition of Biogas Digestates Determines Their Effect on Soil Microbial Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Kerstin Nielsen

    (Institute for Agricultural and Urban Ecological Projects affiliated to Berlin Humboldt University, Philippstraße 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany)

  • Christina-Luise Roß

    (Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Berlin Humboldt University, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany)

  • Marieke Hoffmann

    (Deutsche Umwelthilfe E.V., Hackescher Markt 4, 10178 Berlin, Germany)

  • Andreas Muskolus

    (Institute for Agricultural and Urban Ecological Projects affiliated to Berlin Humboldt University, Philippstraße 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany)

  • Frank Ellmer

    (Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Berlin Humboldt University, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany)

  • Timo Kautz

    (Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Berlin Humboldt University, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Digestates are commonly used as organic inputs in agriculture. This study aimed to answer four questions: (1) What are the immediate and longer-term impacts of digestates on soil microbial activity?; (2) How much of the digestates’ carbon is mineralized within the first months? (3) How do the nitrogen, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose contents of digestates influence microbial activity and carbon mineralization? (4) How does the soil type influence mineralization? To investigate this, dehydrogenase activity (DHA) was measured in a field trial and in laboratory experiments with five digestates (DGs), cattle slurry, and cattle manure. DHA measurements were supplemented with soil respiration experiments using two different soils. DHA was significantly increased by all organic inputs, but decreased back to the control level within seven months under field conditions. Twenty percent to 44% of the organic carbon (C org ) in the digestates was converted to CO 2 after 178 days. Soil respiration was significantly negatively correlated to lignin content (r = −0.82, p < 0.01) and not correlated to nitrogen, cellulose, or hemicellulose content. On the basis of equal carbon application, slurry promoted soil respiration and DHA more strongly than digestates in the short term.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerstin Nielsen & Christina-Luise Roß & Marieke Hoffmann & Andreas Muskolus & Frank Ellmer & Timo Kautz, 2020. "The Chemical Composition of Biogas Digestates Determines Their Effect on Soil Microbial Activity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:244-:d:375790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronica Arthurson, 2009. "Closing the Global Energy and Nutrient Cycles through Application of Biogas Residue to Agricultural Land – Potential Benefits and Drawback," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Appels, Lise & Lauwers, Joost & Degrève, Jan & Helsen, Lieve & Lievens, Bart & Willems, Kris & Van Impe, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2011. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4295-4301.
    3. Abubaker, J. & Risberg, K. & Pell, M., 2012. "Biogas residues as fertilisers – Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 126-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Speranza Claudia Panico & Valeria Memoli & Lucia Santorufo & Stefania Aiello & Rossella Barile & Anna De Marco & Giulia Maisto, 2022. "Soil Biological Responses under Different Vegetation Types in Mediterranean Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    2. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin & Liliana Paschia & Nicoleta Luminita Gudanescu Nicolau & Gabriel Cucui & Dan Marius Coman & Sorina Geanina Stanescu, 2019. "The Analysis of the Economic Effects on the Greening and Recovery of the Sludge Waste Resulting from the Biogas Production Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Jan Moestedt & Sören Nilsson Påledal & Anna Schnürer & Erik Nordell, 2013. "Biogas Production from Thin Stillage on an Industrial Scale—Experience and Optimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Xiaolong Lin & Zongmu Yao & Xinguang Wang & Shangqi Xu & Chunjie Tian & Lei Tian, 2021. "Water-Covered Depth with the Freeze–Thaw Cycle Influences Fungal Communities on Rice Straw Decomposition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Edwards, Joel & Othman, Maazuza & Burn, Stewart, 2015. "A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 815-828.
    6. Gahyun Baek & Jaai Kim & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2018. "Role and Potential of Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    8. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Wenyan Chen & Qiang Cai & Yuan Zhao & Guojuan Zheng & Yuting Liang, 2014. "Toxicity Evaluation of Pig Slurry Using Luminescent Bacteria and Zebrafish," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Jacek Pranagal & Sławomir Ligęza & Halina Smal & Joanna Gmitrowicz-Iwan, 2023. "Effects of Waste Application (Carboniferous Rock and Post-Fermentation Sludge) on Soil Quality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Karin S. Levin & Felizitas Winkhart & Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen & Hans Jürgen Reents & Karl Auerswald, 2023. "Artefacts in Field Trial Research—Lateral Ammonia Fluxes Confound Fertiliser Plot Experiments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    13. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Veronica Arthurson & Lotta Jäderlund, 2011. "Utilization of Natural Farm Resources for Promoting High Energy Efficiency in Low-Input Organic Farming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Di Maria, Francesco & Sordi, Alessio & Cirulli, Giuseppe & Micale, Caterina, 2015. "Amount of energy recoverable from an existing sludge digester with the co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste at reduced retention time," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-14.
    16. Irina N. Vikhareva & Guliya K. Aminova & Aliya K. Mazitova, 2022. "Resource Cycling: Application of Anaerobic Utilization Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Hagos, Kiros & Zong, Jianpeng & Li, Dongxue & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1485-1496.
    18. Begum, Sameena & Ahuja, Shruti & Anupoju, Gangagni Rao & Kuruti, Kranti & Juntupally, Sudharshan & Gandu, Bharath & Ahuja, D.K., 2017. "Process intensification with inline pre and post processing mechanism for valorization of poultry litter through high rate biomethanation technology: A full scale experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 428-436.
    19. Ghasimi, Dara S.M. & de Kreuk, Merle & Maeng, Sung Kyu & Zandvoort, Marcel H. & van Lier, Jules B., 2016. "High-rate thermophilic bio-methanation of the fine sieved fraction from Dutch municipal raw sewage: Cost-effective potentials for on-site energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 569-582.
    20. Magdalena Kachel & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Alaa Subr & Stanisław Parafiniuk & Artur Przywara & Milan Koszel & Grzegorz Zając, 2020. "Impact of the Type of Fertilization and the Addition of Glycerol on the Quality of Spring Rape Straw Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:244-:d:375790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.