IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i1p146-d1026659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responses of Soybean to Selected Abiotic Stresses—Photoperiod, Temperature and Water

Author

Listed:
  • Mariola Staniak

    (Department of Forage Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland)

  • Ewa Szpunar-Krok

    (Department of Crop Production, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Anna Kocira

    (Institute of Human Nutrition and Agriculture, The University College of Applied Sciences in Chełm, Pocztowa 54, 22-100 Chełm, Poland)

Abstract

The sharp increase in soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merrill) acreage in the late 20th century and early 21st century is due to the demand for edible oil and feed protein. However, a limiting factor in the extent of soybean cultivation is its high heat requirements and response to photoperiod. Most varieties are short-day plants and are generally the best-yielding genotypes. At higher latitudes (longer day length), there is a delay in the occurrence of subsequent developmental stages and problems with plant maturation before the onset of autumn frost. Global warming allows the cultivation range of warm-season species (including soya) to be shifted; however, periodic droughts and very high temperatures limit crop production. Adverse weather events result in a reduction in soybean seed yield of around 30%. Environmental stresses related to day length, high and low temperatures and water shortage or excess have the greatest impact on soybean yields, as we have no influence on them and can only, to a very limited extent, offset their negative effects. This paper reviews the recent world literature on how soybean responds to these stress factors. The results of our own research were also used.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariola Staniak & Ewa Szpunar-Krok & Anna Kocira, 2023. "Responses of Soybean to Selected Abiotic Stresses—Photoperiod, Temperature and Water," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:146-:d:1026659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak & Marzena Tomaszewska & Rafał Kornas & Jacek Cymerman & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Halina Lipińska, 2020. "Legume Cover Crops as One of the Elements of Strategic Weed Management and Soil Quality Improvement. A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-41, September.
    2. Shapiro, B.I. & Brorsen, B.Wade & Doster, D. Howard, 1992. "Adoption of Double-Cropping Soybeans and Wheat," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 33-40, December.
    3. Gillian Rose & Tom Osborne & Helen Greatrex & Tim Wheeler, 2016. "Impact of progressive global warming on the global-scale yield of maize and soybean," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 417-428, February.
    4. Gillian Rose & Tom Osborne & Helen Greatrex & Tim Wheeler, 2016. "Impact of progressive global warming on the global-scale yield of maize and soybean," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 417-428, February.
    5. Wolfram Schlenker & Michael J. Roberts, 2008. "Estimating the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Yields: The Importance of Nonlinear Temperature Effects," NBER Working Papers 13799, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Kenong Xu & Xia Xu & Takeshi Fukao & Patrick Canlas & Reycel Maghirang-Rodriguez & Sigrid Heuer & Abdelbagi M. Ismail & Julia Bailey-Serres & Pamela C. Ronald & David J. Mackill, 2006. "Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice," Nature, Nature, vol. 442(7103), pages 705-708, August.
    7. Mark T. Osterlund & Christian S. Hardtke & Ning Wei & Xing Wang Deng, 2000. "Targeted destabilization of HY5 during light-regulated development of Arabidopsis," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6785), pages 462-466, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Rymuza & Elżbieta Radzka & Joanna Cała, 2023. "The Effect of Applied Biostimulants on the Yielding of Three Non-Genetically Modified Soybean Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Renata Tobiasz-Salach & Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek & Anna Augustyńska-Prejsnar, 2023. "Effect of Different Row Spacing and Sowing Density on Selected Photosynthesis Indices, Yield, and Quality of White Lupine Seeds," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Ahtasham Mushtaq & Hafiz Ghulam Muhu-Din Ahmed & Yawen Zeng, 2024. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Wheat Breeding for Sustainable Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Zhao, Jin & Yang, Xiaoguang & Liu, Zhijuan & Pullens, Johannes W.M. & Chen, Ji & Marek, Gary W. & Chen, Yong & Lv, Shuo & Sun, Shuang, 2020. "Greater maize yield improvements in low/unstable yield zones through recommended nutrient and water inputs in the main cropping regions, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Yuki Ishikawa Ishiwata & Jun Furuya, 2020. "Evaluating the Contribution of Soybean Rust- Resistant Cultivars to Soybean Production and the Soybean Market in Brazil: A Supply and Demand Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Huizhao Yang & Sailesh Ranjitkar & Wenxuan Xu & Lei Han & Jianbo Yang & Liqing Wu & Jianchu Xu, 2021. "Crop-climate model in support of adjusting local ecological calendar in the Taxkorgan, eastern Pamir Plateau," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Joshua Graff Zivin & Matthew Neidell, 2014. "Temperature and the Allocation of Time: Implications for Climate Change," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-26.
    6. Hasan, M. Mehedi & Alauddin, Mohammad & Rashid Sarker, Md. Abdur & Jakaria, Mohammad & Alamgir, Mahiuddin, 2019. "Climate sensitivity of wheat yield in Bangladesh: Implications for the United Nations sustainable development goals 2 and 6," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Joshi, Niraj Prakash & Maharjan, Keshav Lall & Piya, Luni, 2011. "Effect of climate variables on yield of major food-crops in Nepal -A time-series analysis-," MPRA Paper 35379, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hifzur RAHMAN & Vijayalakshmi DAKSHINAMURTHI & Sasikala RAMASAMY & Sudha MANICKAM & Ashok Kumar KALIYAPERUMAL & Suchismita RAHA & Naresh PANNEERSELVAM & Valarmathi RAMANATHAN & Jagadeeshselvam NALLATH, 2018. "Introgression of submergence tolerance into CO 43, a popular rice variety of India, through marker-assisted backcross breeding," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 101-108.
    9. Zeynep K. Hansen & Gary D. Libecap & Scott E. Lowe, 2011. "Climate Variability and Water Infrastructure: Historical Experience in the Western United States," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present, pages 253-280, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Sébastien Mary & Kelsey Shaw & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2019. "Does the sectoral composition of growth affect child stunting reductions?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(2), pages 225-244, March.
    11. L. Toma & A. P. Barnes & L.-A. Sutherland & S. Thomson & F. Burnett & K. Mathews, 2018. "Impact of information transfer on farmers’ uptake of innovative crop technologies: a structural equation model applied to survey data," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 864-881, August.
    12. Fisher, Anthony, 2009. "Climate Change and Agriculture Reconsidered," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt33v2d7vc, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    13. Eaves, James & Eaves, Stephen, 2007. "Renewable corn-ethanol and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5958-5963, November.
    14. Marra, Michele & Pannell, David J. & Abadi Ghadim, Amir, 2003. "The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(2-3), pages 215-234.
    15. Sarker, Md. Abdur Rashid & Alam, Khorshed & Gow, Jeff, 2012. "Exploring the relationship between climate change and rice yield in Bangladesh: An analysis of time series data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 11-16.
    16. Baojing Sun & Changhao Guo & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2013. "Weather Derivatives and Crop Insurance in China," Working Papers 2013-02, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    17. Katarzyna Rymuza & Elżbieta Radzka & Joanna Cała, 2023. "The Effect of Applied Biostimulants on the Yielding of Three Non-Genetically Modified Soybean Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Taikui Zhang & Weichen Huang & Lin Zhang & De-Zhu Li & Ji Qi & Hong Ma, 2024. "Phylogenomic profiles of whole-genome duplications in Poaceae and landscape of differential duplicate retention and losses among major Poaceae lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    19. AJ A. Bostian & Moriah B. Bostian & Marita Laukkanen & Antti Simola, 2020. "Assessing the productivity consequences of agri-environmental practices when adoption is endogenous," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 141-162, April.
    20. Syster C. Maart-Noelck & Oliver Musshoff, 2014. "Measuring the risk attitude of decision-makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(3), pages 336-352, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:146-:d:1026659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.