IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i4p97-d339774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Greenhouse Tomato Yield and Aerial Dry Matter

Author

Listed:
  • Kelvin López-Aguilar

    (Doctorado en Ciencias en Agricultura Protegida, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza

    (Horticultura, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Susana González-Morales

    (CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Antonio Juárez-Maldonado

    (Botánica, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Pamela Chiñas-Sánchez

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México, I. T. Saltillo, Saltillo 25280, Mexico)

  • Alvaro Morelos-Moreno

    (CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

Abstract

Non-linear systems, such as biological systems, can be simulated by artificial neural network (ANN) techniques. This research aims to use ANN to simulate the accumulated aerial dry matter (leaf, stem, and fruit) and fresh fruit yield of a tomato crop. Two feed-forward backpropagation ANNs, with three hidden layers, were trained and validated by the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for weights and bias adjusted. The input layer consisted of the leaf area, plant height, fruit number, dry matter of leaves, stems and fruits, and the growth degree-days at 136 days after transplanting (DAT); these were obtained from a tomato crop, a hybrid, EL CID F1, with indeterminate growth habits, grown with a mixture of peat moss and perlite 1:1 ( v / v ) (substrate) and calcareous soil (soil). Based on the experimentation of the ANNs with one, two and three hidden layers, with MSE values less than 1.55, 0.94 and 0.49, respectively, the ANN with three hidden layers was chosen. The 7-10-7-5-2 and 7-10-8-5-2 topologies showed the best performance for the substrate (R = 0.97, MSE = 0.107, error = 12.06%) and soil (R = 0.94, MSE = 0.049, error = 13.65%), respectively. These topologies correctly simulated the aerial dry matter and the fresh fruit yield of the studied tomato crop.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelvin López-Aguilar & Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza & Susana González-Morales & Antonio Juárez-Maldonado & Pamela Chiñas-Sánchez & Alvaro Morelos-Moreno, 2020. "Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Greenhouse Tomato Yield and Aerial Dry Matter," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:97-:d:339774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/97/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/97/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Monisha & Hill, Robert L. & Walthall, Charles, 2005. "Artificial neural networks for corn and soybean yield prediction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Zhang, WenJun & Bai, ChangJun & Liu, GuoDao, 2007. "Neural network modeling of ecosystems: A case study on cabbage growth system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 317-325.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kazuya Maeda & Dong-Hyuk Ahn, 2021. "Estimation of Dry Matter Production and Yield Prediction in Greenhouse Cucumber without Destructive Measurements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Elzbieta Czembor & Zygmunt Kaczmarek & Wiesław Pilarczyk & Dariusz Mańkowski & Jerzy H. Czembor, 2022. "Simulating Spring Barley Yield under Moderate Input Management System in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Wang, Rong & Sun, Zhaojun & Yang, Dongyan & Ma, Ling, 2022. "Simulating cucumber plant heights using optimized growth functions driven by water and accumulated temperature in a solar greenhouse," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Blaud, Pierre Clement & Haurant, Pierrick & Chevrel, Philippe & Claveau, Fabien & Mouraud, Anthony, 2023. "Multi-flow optimization of a greenhouse system: A hierarchical control approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    5. Jolanta Wawrzyniak, 2020. "Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Assess the Mycological State of Bulk Stored Rapeseeds," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlontzos, G. & Pardalos, P.M., 2017. "Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 155-162.
    2. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    3. Hao Hu & Yun Ren & Hongkui Zhou & Weidong Lou & Pengfei Hao & Baogang Lin & Guangzhi Zhang & Qing Gu & Shuijin Hua, 2024. "Oilseed Rape Yield Prediction from UAVs Using Vegetation Index and Machine Learning: A Case Study in East China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Srinivasagan N. Subhashree & C. Igathinathane & Adnan Akyuz & Md. Borhan & John Hendrickson & David Archer & Mark Liebig & David Toledo & Kevin Sedivec & Scott Kronberg & Jonathan Halvorson, 2023. "Tools for Predicting Forage Growth in Rangelands and Economic Analyses—A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Jiménez, Daniel & Cock, James & Jarvis, Andy & Garcia, James & Satizábal, Héctor F. & Damme, Patrick Van & Pérez-Uribe, Andrés & Barreto-Sanz, Miguel A., 2011. "Interpretation of commercial production information: A case study of lulo (Solanum quitoense), an under-researched Andean fruit," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 258-270, March.
    6. Xu, Chang & Katchova, Ani L., 2019. "Predicting Soybean Yield with NDVI Using a Flexible Fourier Transform Model," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 402-416, August.
    7. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Selection of Independent Variables for Crop Yield Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network Models with Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    8. García-Alonso, Carlos R. & Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes & Hervás-Martínez, César, 2010. "Income prediction in the agrarian sector using product unit neural networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 355-365, July.
    9. Pourmohammadali, Behrooz & Hosseinifard, Seyed Javad & Hassan Salehi, Mohammad & Shirani, Hossein & Esfandiarpour Boroujeni, Isa, 2019. "Effects of soil properties, water quality and management practices on pistachio yield in Rafsanjan region, southeast of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 894-902.
    10. Jules F. Cacho & Jeremy Feinstein & Colleen R. Zumpf & Yuki Hamada & Daniel J. Lee & Nictor L. Namoi & DoKyoung Lee & Nicholas N. Boersma & Emily A. Heaton & John J. Quinn & Cristina Negri, 2023. "Predicting Biomass Yields of Advanced Switchgrass Cultivars for Bioenergy and Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin & Ehteram, Mohammad & Moshizi, Zahra Gerkaninezhad & Jamshidi, Sajad, 2022. "Evaluation and uncertainty assessment of wheat yield prediction by multilayer perceptron model with bayesian and copula bayesian approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    12. Emerson Rodolfo Abraham & João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Oduvaldo Vendrametto & Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi & Aguinaldo Eduardo de Souza & Marcos de Oliveira Morais, 2020. "Time Series Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks: An Analysis Using Brazilian Soybean Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Takeshi Matsunaga, Fabio & Rakocevic, Miroslava & Brancher, Jacques Duílio, 2014. "Modeling the 3D structure and rhythmic growth responses to environment in dioecious yerba-mate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 34-44.
    14. Varga, M. & Csukas, B., 2017. "Generation of extensible ecosystem models from a network structure and from locally executable programs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 364(C), pages 25-41.
    15. Taheri-Rad, Alireza & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Rohani, Abbas & Khoramdel, Surur & Nikkhah, Amin, 2017. "Energy flow modeling and predicting the yield of Iranian paddy cultivars using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 405-412.
    16. Szulczewski, Wieslaw & Zyromski, Andrzej & Biniak-Pieróg, Malgorzata & Machowczyk, Anna, 2010. "Modelling of the effect of dry periods on yielding of spring barley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 587-595, May.
    17. Zhang, WenJun & Zhang, XiYan, 2008. "Neural network modeling of survival dynamics of holometabolous insects: A case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 433-443.
    18. Renato Domiciano Silva Rosado & Cosme Damião Cruz & Leiri Daiane Barili & José Eustáquio de Souza Carneiro & Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro & Vinicius Quintão Carneiro & Jackson Tavela da Silva & Moy, 2020. "Artificial Neural Networks in the Prediction of Genetic Merit to Flowering Traits in Bean Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Kuruguntu Mohan Krithika & Nachimuthu Maheswari & Manickam Sivagami, 2022. "Models for feature selection and efficient crop yield prediction in the groundnut production," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 131-141.
    20. Jalilov, Shokhrukh-Mirzo & Rahman, Wakilur & Palash, Salauddin & Jahan, Hasneen & Mainuddin, Mohammed & Ward, Frank A., 2022. "Exploring strategies to control the cost of food security: Evidence from Bangladesh," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:97-:d:339774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.