IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v97y2010i5p587-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of the effect of dry periods on yielding of spring barley

Author

Listed:
  • Szulczewski, Wieslaw
  • Zyromski, Andrzej
  • Biniak-Pieróg, Malgorzata
  • Machowczyk, Anna

Abstract

The paper presents a weather-yield model developed for the purpose of estimating spring barley yield on the basis of dry spells occurring in individual periods between the phenological phases of that plant. For that purpose research material on spring barley, originating from the years 1976-1997, was used as well as diurnal sums of precipitation. Five periods were considered in the analysis: sowing-emergence, emergence-tillering, tillering-heading, heading-milk ripeness and milk ripeness-full ripeness. In the study a model of changes in the amount of water available for plant during rainless periods was used. Five measures were adopted for characterisation of the approximation error: correlation coefficient, mean relative error, relative root mean square error, model efficiency and coefficient of residual mass. The analyses performed demonstrated that yield reduction is significantly influenced by rainless periods that occur in the sowing-emergence and tillering-heading inter-phase periods. The adopted criteria for yield reduction estimation show considerable similarity for the emergence-tillering and heading-milk ripeness inter-phase periods. At the same time, their influence on yield reduction is three-fold lower than during the sowing-emergence and tillering-heading inter-phase periods. Analyses performed with the use of the developed model indicate that yield size is affected by rainless periods of duration longer than 30% of the inter-phase period.

Suggested Citation

  • Szulczewski, Wieslaw & Zyromski, Andrzej & Biniak-Pieróg, Malgorzata & Machowczyk, Anna, 2010. "Modelling of the effect of dry periods on yielding of spring barley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 587-595, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:5:p:587-595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(09)00358-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Monisha & Hill, Robert L. & Walthall, Charles, 2005. "Artificial neural networks for corn and soybean yield prediction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Aggarwal, P. K., 1995. "Uncertainties in crop, soil and weather inputs used in growth models: Implications for simulated outputs and their applications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 361-384.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mulka, Rafał & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Szlachta, Józef & Mulka, Mariusz, 2016. "Estimation of methane production for batch technology – A new approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 440-449.
    2. Żyromski, Andrzej & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata & Jakubowski, Wojciech, 2016. "The estimation of basket willow (Salix viminalis) yield – New approach. Part I: Background and statistical description," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1118-1126.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    2. Confalonieri, Roberto & Acutis, Marco & Bellocchi, Gianni & Donatelli, Marcello, 2009. "Multi-metric evaluation of the models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1395-1410.
    3. Wang, Zhiqiang & Ye, Li & Jiang, Jingyi & Fan, Yida & Zhang, Xiaoran, 2022. "Review of application of EPIC crop growth model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    4. Srinivasagan N. Subhashree & C. Igathinathane & Adnan Akyuz & Md. Borhan & John Hendrickson & David Archer & Mark Liebig & David Toledo & Kevin Sedivec & Scott Kronberg & Jonathan Halvorson, 2023. "Tools for Predicting Forage Growth in Rangelands and Economic Analyses—A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Jiménez, Daniel & Cock, James & Jarvis, Andy & Garcia, James & Satizábal, Héctor F. & Damme, Patrick Van & Pérez-Uribe, Andrés & Barreto-Sanz, Miguel A., 2011. "Interpretation of commercial production information: A case study of lulo (Solanum quitoense), an under-researched Andean fruit," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 258-270, March.
    6. Kelvin López-Aguilar & Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza & Susana González-Morales & Antonio Juárez-Maldonado & Pamela Chiñas-Sánchez & Alvaro Morelos-Moreno, 2020. "Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Greenhouse Tomato Yield and Aerial Dry Matter," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Jules F. Cacho & Jeremy Feinstein & Colleen R. Zumpf & Yuki Hamada & Daniel J. Lee & Nictor L. Namoi & DoKyoung Lee & Nicholas N. Boersma & Emily A. Heaton & John J. Quinn & Cristina Negri, 2023. "Predicting Biomass Yields of Advanced Switchgrass Cultivars for Bioenergy and Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin & Ehteram, Mohammad & Moshizi, Zahra Gerkaninezhad & Jamshidi, Sajad, 2022. "Evaluation and uncertainty assessment of wheat yield prediction by multilayer perceptron model with bayesian and copula bayesian approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    9. Zhao, Gang & Bryan, Brett A. & Song, Xiaodong, 2014. "Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the APSIM-wheat model: Interactions between cultivar, environmental, and management parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Renato Domiciano Silva Rosado & Cosme Damião Cruz & Leiri Daiane Barili & José Eustáquio de Souza Carneiro & Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro & Vinicius Quintão Carneiro & Jackson Tavela da Silva & Moy, 2020. "Artificial Neural Networks in the Prediction of Genetic Merit to Flowering Traits in Bean Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Kuruguntu Mohan Krithika & Nachimuthu Maheswari & Manickam Sivagami, 2022. "Models for feature selection and efficient crop yield prediction in the groundnut production," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 131-141.
    12. Jalilov, Shokhrukh-Mirzo & Rahman, Wakilur & Palash, Salauddin & Jahan, Hasneen & Mainuddin, Mohammed & Ward, Frank A., 2022. "Exploring strategies to control the cost of food security: Evidence from Bangladesh," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Park, S.J. & Hwang, C.S. & Vlek, P.L.G., 2005. "Comparison of adaptive techniques to predict crop yield response under varying soil and land management conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 59-81, July.
    14. Omolola M. Adisa & Joel O. Botai & Abiodun M. Adeola & Abubeker Hassen & Christina M. Botai & Daniel Darkey & Eyob Tesfamariam, 2019. "Application of Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Maize Production in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Vlontzos, G. & Pardalos, P.M., 2017. "Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 155-162.
    16. Mooney, Sian & Antle, John M. & Capalbo, Susan Marie & Paustian, Keith H., 2003. "Incorporating Uncertainty In Integrated Assessment Modeling," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22225, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Hartkamp, A. D. & White, J. W. & Hoogenboom, G., 2003. "Comparison of three weather generators for crop modeling: a case study for subtropical environments," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 539-560, May.
    18. Bandaru, Varaprasad, 2022. "Climate data induced uncertainties in simulated carbon fluxes under corn and soybean systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Wu, Renye & Lawes, Roger & Oliver, Yvette & Fletcher, Andrew & Chen, Chao, 2019. "How well do we need to estimate plant-available water capacity to simulate water-limited yield potential?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 441-447.
    20. Xu, Chang & Katchova, Ani L., 2019. "Predicting Soybean Yield with NDVI Using a Flexible Fourier Transform Model," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 402-416, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:5:p:587-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.