IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v273y2022ics0378377422004280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and uncertainty assessment of wheat yield prediction by multilayer perceptron model with bayesian and copula bayesian approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin
  • Ehteram, Mohammad
  • Moshizi, Zahra Gerkaninezhad
  • Jamshidi, Sajad

Abstract

An accurate crop yield forecast is vital for sustaining food security and preventing famine. Artificial intelligence provides a robust tool for integrating environmental, physiological, and management data and predicting crop yield. In this study, we used a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model in its default and hybrid learning modes to predict wheat yield. In its default mode, MLP was trained with the backpropagation algorithm, and in the hybrid mode, MLP was trained with the Water Striders Algorithm (WSA), Sine-Cosine Algorithm (SCA), and Genetic Algorithm (GA). We further considered two ensemble modeling approaches, including the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and Copula-based Bayesian Model Averaging (CBMA). The study area was classified into four homogenous wheat cultivation regions using the Fuzzy clustering approach, and for each region, the models were trained based on 30 years of fertilizer information, harvested yield, and climatic data. Our results showed that hybridizing MLP with an optimization algorithm provides more accurate yield predictions than its default mode. WSA required the lowest computational time, and its combination with MLP resulted in a more accurate yield prediction compared to other optimization algorithms. The accuracy of yield predictions was further improved when ensemble modeling was implemented. Accordingly, the CBMA approach generated the most accurate result with the lowest uncertainty range. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the CBMA was 0.026, 0.058, 0.088, 0.133, and 0.0201 lower than that of the BMA, MLP-WSA, MLP-SCA, MLP-GA, and MLP models. GLUE uncertainty analysis verified the superiority of the hybrid models and ensemble approaches. The predicted yield by CBMA, BMA, and MLP-WSA covered 94 %, 92 %, and 89 % of the observations, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin & Ehteram, Mohammad & Moshizi, Zahra Gerkaninezhad & Jamshidi, Sajad, 2022. "Evaluation and uncertainty assessment of wheat yield prediction by multilayer perceptron model with bayesian and copula bayesian approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:273:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004280
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422004280
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babak Mohammadi & Farshad Ahmadi & Saeid Mehdizadeh & Yiqing Guan & Quoc Bao Pham & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh & Doan Quang Tri, 2020. "Developing Novel Robust Models to Improve the Accuracy of Daily Streamflow Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3387-3409, August.
    2. Jamshidi, Sajad & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Kamgar-Haghighi, Ali Akbar & Shahsavar, Ali Reza & Niyogi, Dev, 2020. "Evapotranspiration, crop coefficients, and physiological responses of citrus trees in semi-arid climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Chen, Kefei & O'Leary, Rebecca A. & Evans, Fiona H., 2019. "A simple and parsimonious generalised additive model for predicting wheat yield in a decision support tool," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 140-150.
    4. Kaul, Monisha & Hill, Robert L. & Walthall, Charles, 2005. "Artificial neural networks for corn and soybean yield prediction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Deepak K. Ray & James S. Gerber & Graham K. MacDonald & Paul C. West, 2015. "Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, May.
    6. Huaping Huang & Zhongmin Liang & Binquan Li & Dong Wang & Yiming Hu & Yujie Li, 2019. "Combination of Multiple Data-Driven Models for Long-Term Monthly Runoff Predictions Based on Bayesian Model Averaging," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(9), pages 3321-3338, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Sardar Shahraki & Tommaso Caloiero & Ommolbanin Bazrafshan, 2023. "Influence of Climatic Factors on Yields of Pistachio, Mango, and Bananas in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Zhou, Hanmi & Ma, Linshuang & Niu, Xiaoli & Xiang, Youzhen & Chen, Jiageng & Su, Yumin & Li, Jichen & Lu, Sibo & Chen, Cheng & Wu, Qi, 2024. "A novel hybrid model combined with ensemble embedded feature selection method for estimating reference evapotranspiration in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    3. Xinyu Chang & Jun Guo & Hui Qin & Jingwei Huang & Xinying Wang & Pingan Ren, 2024. "Single-Objective and Multi-Objective Flood Interval Forecasting Considering Interval Fitting Coefficients," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(10), pages 3953-3972, August.
    4. Ali Sardar Shahraki & Mohim Tash & Tommaso Caloiero & Ommolbanin Bazrafshan, 2024. "Optimal Allocation of Water Resources Using Agro-Economic Development and Colony Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Wenfeng Li & Kun Pan & Wenrong Liu & Weihua Xiao & Shijian Ni & Peng Shi & Xiuyue Chen & Tong Li, 2024. "Monitoring Maize Canopy Chlorophyll Content throughout the Growth Stages Based on UAV MS and RGB Feature Fusion," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Florence & Andrew Revill & Stephen Hoad & Robert Rees & Mathew Williams, 2021. "The Effect of Antecedence on Empirical Model Forecasts of Crop Yield from Observations of Canopy Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Jeetendra Prakash Aryal & Tek B. Sapkota & Ritika Khurana & Arun Khatri-Chhetri & Dil Bahadur Rahut & M. L. Jat, 2020. "Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: adaptation options in smallholder production systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5045-5075, August.
    3. Xueqin Jiang & Shanjun Luo & Qin Ye & Xican Li & Weihua Jiao, 2022. "Hyperspectral Estimates of Soil Moisture Content Incorporating Harmonic Indicators and Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Zhiqiang Jiang & Zhengyang Tang & Yi Liu & Yuyun Chen & Zhongkai Feng & Yang Xu & Hairong Zhang, 2019. "Area Moment and Error Based Forecasting Difficulty and its Application in Inflow Forecasting Level Evaluation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(13), pages 4553-4568, October.
    5. Qiang Wang & Yuanfan Li & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Smith, Tom & McKnight, Brent, 2016. "Environmental finance: A research agenda for interdisciplinary finance research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 124-130.
    7. Lili Wang & Yanlong Guo & Manhong Fan, 2022. "Improving Annual Streamflow Prediction by Extracting Information from High-frequency Components of Streamflow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4535-4555, September.
    8. Shahzad, Muhammad Faisal & Abdulai, Awudu, 2020. "Adaptation to extreme weather conditions and farm performance in rural Pakistan," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Kamini Yadav & Hatim M. E. Geli, 2021. "Prediction of Crop Yield for New Mexico Based on Climate and Remote Sensing Data for the 1920–2019 Period," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Kukal, M.S. & Irmak, S., 2020. "Impact of irrigation on interannual variability in United States agricultural productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    12. Ibrahim Sufiyan & J.I. Magaji & A.T.Ogah & K.D. Mohammed & K.K Geidam, 2020. "Effect Of Climatic Variables On Agricultural Productivity And Distribution In Plateau State Nigeria," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 5-9, February.
    13. Wang, Teng & Yi, Fujin & Liu, Huilin & Wu, Ximing & Zhong, Funing, 2021. "Can Agricultural Mechanization Have a Mitigation Effect on China's Yield Variability?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315098, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Seijger, Chris & Chukalla, Abebe & Bremer, Karin & Borghuis, Gerlo & Christoforidou, Maria & Mul, Marloes & Hellegers, Petra & van Halsema, Gerardo, 2023. "Agronomic analysis of WaPOR applications: Confirming conservative biomass water productivity in inherent and climatological variance of WaPOR data outputs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    15. Manish Kumar & Anuradha Kumari & Daniel Prakash Kushwaha & Pravendra Kumar & Anurag Malik & Rawshan Ali & Alban Kuriqi, 2020. "Estimation of Daily Stage–Discharge Relationship by Using Data-Driven Techniques of a Perennial River, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Rogna, Marco & Schamel, Günter & Weissensteiner, Alex, 2019. "Choosing Between Hail Insurance and Anti-Hail Nets: A Simple Model and a Simulation among Apples Producers in South Tyrol," 2019: Trading for Good - Agricultural Trade in the Context of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation... Symposium, June 23-25, 2019, Seville, Spain 312593, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    17. Nazan An & Mustafa Tufan Turp & Murat Türkeş & Mehmet Levent Kurnaz, 2020. "Mid-Term Impact of Climate Change on Hazelnut Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Agnese Krievina & Ilze Upite & Daniels Kotovs, 2022. "LASAM Model: An Important Tool in the Decision Support System for Policymakers and Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Bekkers, Eddy & Brockmeier, Martina & Francois, Joseph & Yang, Fan, 2017. "Local Food Prices and International Price Transmission," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 216-230.
    20. Saitta, Daniela & Consoli, Simona & Ferlito, Filippo & Torrisi, Biagio & Allegra, Maria & Longo-Minnolo, Giuseppe & Ramírez-Cuesta, Juan Miguel & Vanella, Daniela, 2021. "Adaptation of citrus orchards to deficit irrigation strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:273:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.