IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i4p129-d345317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review on the Current State of Knowledge of Growing Conditions, Agronomic Soil Health Practices and Utilities of Hemp in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Ifeoluwa Adesina

    (Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Design, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA)

  • Arnab Bhowmik

    (Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Design, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA)

  • Harmandeep Sharma

    (Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Design, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA)

  • Abolghasem Shahbazi

    (Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Design, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA)

Abstract

Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) is an emerging high-value specialty crop that can be cultivated for either fiber, seed, or cannabidiol (CBD). The demand for hemp and its products has been consistently on the rise in the 21st century. The United States of America (USA) has reintroduced hemp and legalized its production as an agricultural commodity through the 2018 Federal Farm Bill. Although there is a renewed interest in the adoption of hemp due to the emerging market, its production in the United States (US) remains limited partly because of unclear agronomic guidance and fertilization recommendations. This review article provides information on the current agronomic management practices that are available in the literature and identifies the future research needs for cultivating this multipurpose crop to address the growing market demands. Hemp production could be beneficial if managed properly. Hemp fertilizer requirements vary in accordance with the type of hemp grown (seed, fiber, or CBD), soil, environmental conditions and requires a wide range of macro- and micronutrients. Integrating management practices in hemp cultivation intended to build soil health is promising since the hemp cropping system is suitable for crop rotation, cover cropping, and livestock integration through animal waste applications. Hemp also has significant environmental benefits since it has the potential to remediate contaminated soils through phytoremediation, convert high amounts of atmospheric CO 2 to biomass through bio-sequestration, and hemp biomass for bioenergy production. This review identifies that most of the agronomic research in the past has been limited to hemp fiber and, to some extent, hemp seed but not CBD hemp. With the increase in the global markets for hemp products, more research needs to be conducted to provide agronomic guidelines for sustainable hemp production.

Suggested Citation

  • Ifeoluwa Adesina & Arnab Bhowmik & Harmandeep Sharma & Abolghasem Shahbazi, 2020. "A Review on the Current State of Knowledge of Growing Conditions, Agronomic Soil Health Practices and Utilities of Hemp in the United States," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:129-:d:345317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trey Malone & Kevin Gomez, 2019. "Hemp in the United States: A Case Study of Regulatory Path Dependence," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 199-214, June.
    2. Johannes Lehmann & John Gaunt & Marco Rondon, 2006. "Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 395-419, March.
    3. Beatrice Dingha & Leah Sandler & Arnab Bhowmik & Clement Akotsen-Mensah & Louis Jackai & Kevin Gibson & Ronald Turco, 2019. "Industrial Hemp Knowledge and Interest among North Carolina Organic Farmers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Yuqing & Lacasse, Hannah & Kolodinsky, Jane M. & Mark, Tyler B. & Buzas, Jeff & Whitehouse, Claire, 2024. "Marijuana Legalization and Hemp Policies and Demand for Hemp and Cannabidiol (CBD) Foods," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343804, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Chun Hua Julia Liu & Francesco Pomponi & Bernardino D’Amico, 2023. "The Extent to Which Hemp Insulation Materials Can Be Used in Canadian Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Mehrab Valizadehderakhshan & Abolghasem Shahbazi & Masoud Kazem-Rostami & Matthew Scott Todd & Arnab Bhowmik & Lijun Wang, 2021. "Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L. (Hemp)—Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Teodoro Semeraro & Aurelia Scarano & Riccardo Buccolieri & Angelo Santino & Eeva Aarrevaara, 2021. "Planning of Urban Green Spaces: An Ecological Perspective on Human Benefits," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Hilary Mayton & Masoume Amirkhani & Michael Loos & Burton Johnson & John Fike & Chuck Johnson & Kevin Myers & Jennifer Starr & Gary C. Bergstrom & Alan Taylor, 2022. "Evaluation of Industrial Hemp Seed Treatments for Management of Damping-Off for Enhanced Stand Establishment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Patalee, Buddhika & Jeong, Hoyeon & Mark, Tyler, 2024. "What Makes Hemp Economically Attractive? A Case of Kentucky Hemp Farmers," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(2), May.
    7. Ioanna Kakabouki & Angeliki Kousta & Antigolena Folina & Stella Karydogianni & Charikleia Zisi & Varvara Kouneli & Panayiota Papastylianou, 2021. "Effect of Fertilization with Urea and Inhibitors on Growth, Yield and CBD Concentration of Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Ivana Bajić & Borivoj Pejić & Vladimir Sikora & Mirjana Kostić & Aleksandra Ivanovska & Biljana Pejić & Bojan Vojnov, 2022. "The Effects of Irrigation, Topping, and Interrow Spacing on the Yield and Quality of Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) Fibers in Temperate Climatic Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Dylan Bruce & Grace Connelly & Shelby Ellison, 2022. "Different Fertility Approaches in Organic Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) Production Alter Floral Biomass Yield but Not CBD:THC Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, May.
    10. Michał Kubiś & Piotr Łapka & Łukasz Cieślikiewicz & Genadijs Sahmenko & Maris Sinka & Diana Bajare, 2022. "Analysis of the Thermal Conductivity of a Bio-Based Composite Made of Hemp Shives and a Magnesium Binder," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-11, July.
    11. Sinéad M. Madden & Alan Ryan & Patrick Walsh, 2022. "A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Anna Tedeschi & Maria Grazia Volpe & Franca Polimeno & Francesco Siano & Giuseppe Maglione & Paul Di Tommasi & Ermanno Vasca & Vincenzo Magliulo & Luca Vitale, 2020. "Soil Fertilization with Urea Has Little Effect on Seed Quality but Reduces Soil N 2 O Emissions from a Hemp Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaming Zhao & Xiangjun Wang & Guangwei Yao & Zhizhong Lin & Laiyuan Xu & Yunli Jiang & Zewen Jin & Shengdao Shan & Lifeng Ping, 2022. "Advances in the Effects of Biochar on Microbial Ecological Function in Soil and Crop Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Lizhen Qin & Donghoon Shin, 2023. "Effects of UV Light Treatment on Functional Group and Its Adsorption Capacity of Biochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Jane Kolodinsky & Hannah Lacasse & Katherine Gallagher, 2020. "Making Hemp Choices: Evidence from Vermont," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    5. Beatrice Dingha & Leah Sandler & Arnab Bhowmik & Clement Akotsen-Mensah & Louis Jackai & Kevin Gibson & Ronald Turco, 2019. "Industrial Hemp Knowledge and Interest among North Carolina Organic Farmers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Reijnders, L., 2009. "Are forestation, bio-char and landfilled biomass adequate offsets for the climate effects of burning fossil fuels?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2839-2841, August.
    7. Kung, Chih-Chun & McCarl, Bruce A. & Cao, Xiaoyong, 2013. "Economics of pyrolysis-based energy production and biochar utilization: A case study in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 317-323.
    8. Adam O’Toole & Christophe Moni & Simon Weldon & Anne Schols & Monique Carnol & Bernard Bosman & Daniel P. Rasse, 2018. "Miscanthus Biochar had Limited Effects on Soil Physical Properties, Microbial Biomass, and Grain Yield in a Four-Year Field Experiment in Norway," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    10. Subhan Danish & Muhammad Zafar-ul-Hye & Shah Fahad & Shah Saud & Martin Brtnicky & Tereza Hammerschmiedt & Rahul Datta, 2020. "Drought Stress Alleviation by ACC Deaminase Producing Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Enterobacter cloacae , with and without Timber Waste Biochar in Maize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    12. Farrelly, Damien J. & Everard, Colm D. & Fagan, Colette C. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 712-727.
    13. Eugene Balashov & Natalya Buchkina & Vladimír Šimanský & Ján Horák, 2022. "Effects of Slow Pyrolysis Biochar on CO 2 Emissions from Two Soils under Anaerobic Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Mathews, John A., 2008. "Carbon-negative biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 940-945, March.
    15. Amutio, M. & Lopez, G. & Artetxe, M. & Elordi, G. & Olazar, M. & Bilbao, J., 2012. "Influence of temperature on biomass pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 23-31.
    16. Isabel Teichmann, 2015. "An Economic Assessment of Soil Carbon Sequestration with Biochar in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1476, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Hammond, Jim & Shackley, Simon & Sohi, Saran & Brownsort, Peter, 2011. "Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2646-2655, May.
    18. Matovic, Darko, 2011. "Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: Global and Canadian perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2011-2016.
    19. SundarRajan, PanneerSelvam & Gopinath, Kannappan Panchamoorthy & Arun, Jayaseelan & GracePavithra, Kirubanandam & Pavendan, Kumar & AdithyaJoseph, Antonysamy, 2020. "An insight into carbon balance of product streams from hydrothermal liquefaction of Scenedesmus abundans biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 79-87.
    20. David M. Filiberto & John L. Gaunt, 2013. "Practicality of Biochar Additions to Enhance Soil and Crop Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:129-:d:345317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.