IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2157-d500981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Fertilization with Urea and Inhibitors on Growth, Yield and CBD Concentration of Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Ioanna Kakabouki

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Angeliki Kousta

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Antigolena Folina

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Stella Karydogianni

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Charikleia Zisi

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Varvara Kouneli

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Panayiota Papastylianou

    (Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2019 in two different locations in Greece (Athens and Farsala) to evaluate the effect of urea and urea fertilization with inhibitors on the agronomic yield and quality characteristics of two cannabis varieties ( Cannabis sativa L.), “Uso31”and “Fedora 17”. The experimental design was split-plot with four different fertilization treatments—control, Urea (U), urea with Urease Inhibitor (UI), and urea with Nitrification Inhibitor (NI) and urease inhibitor (UI). The significance of differences between treatments was estimated by using Tukey’s test with a significance level of p = 0.05. The plant height was significantly affected by the different fertilizations and different varieties as well as by the two locations. The maximum plant height was 197 cm for “Fedora 17”in Farsala. The seed yield was higher forthe urea with inhibitors treatment in both varieties. The Cannabidiol (CBD) content was significantly affected by the fertilization—it was higher in urea with inhibitors in “Uso31”and “Fedora 17” treatments. The lowest CBD content value was 1.29% (control) and the highest was 1.69% (urea NI + UI). In conclusion, in both varieties, it seems that urea with inhibitors has a positive effect on their growth, as well as on the increase in cannabidiol (CBD) content.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioanna Kakabouki & Angeliki Kousta & Antigolena Folina & Stella Karydogianni & Charikleia Zisi & Varvara Kouneli & Panayiota Papastylianou, 2021. "Effect of Fertilization with Urea and Inhibitors on Growth, Yield and CBD Concentration of Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2157-:d:500981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Tedeschi & Maria Grazia Volpe & Franca Polimeno & Francesco Siano & Giuseppe Maglione & Paul Di Tommasi & Ermanno Vasca & Vincenzo Magliulo & Luca Vitale, 2020. "Soil Fertilization with Urea Has Little Effect on Seed Quality but Reduces Soil N 2 O Emissions from a Hemp Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Ifeoluwa Adesina & Arnab Bhowmik & Harmandeep Sharma & Abolghasem Shahbazi, 2020. "A Review on the Current State of Knowledge of Growing Conditions, Agronomic Soil Health Practices and Utilities of Hemp in the United States," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Poniatowska & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Milena Szalata & Livia Zarina & Sanita Zute & Karolina Wielgus, 2022. "Variability of cannabinoid yields of fibre hemp cultivars depending on the sowing density and nitrogen fertilisation," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(11), pages 525-532.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivana Bajić & Borivoj Pejić & Vladimir Sikora & Mirjana Kostić & Aleksandra Ivanovska & Biljana Pejić & Bojan Vojnov, 2022. "The Effects of Irrigation, Topping, and Interrow Spacing on the Yield and Quality of Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) Fibers in Temperate Climatic Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Anna Tedeschi & Anna De Marco & Franca Polimeno & Paul Di Tommasi & Giuseppe Maglione & Lucia Ottaiano & Carmen Arena & Vincenzo Magliulo & Luca Vitale, 2020. "Effects of the Fertilizer Added with DMPP on Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Microbial Functional Diversity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Anna Tedeschi & Maria Grazia Volpe & Franca Polimeno & Francesco Siano & Giuseppe Maglione & Paul Di Tommasi & Ermanno Vasca & Vincenzo Magliulo & Luca Vitale, 2020. "Soil Fertilization with Urea Has Little Effect on Seed Quality but Reduces Soil N 2 O Emissions from a Hemp Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Zheng, Yuqing & Lacasse, Hannah & Kolodinsky, Jane M. & Mark, Tyler B. & Buzas, Jeff & Whitehouse, Claire, 2024. "Marijuana Legalization and Hemp Policies and Demand for Hemp and Cannabidiol (CBD) Foods," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343804, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Dylan Bruce & Grace Connelly & Shelby Ellison, 2022. "Different Fertility Approaches in Organic Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) Production Alter Floral Biomass Yield but Not CBD:THC Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Mehrab Valizadehderakhshan & Abolghasem Shahbazi & Masoud Kazem-Rostami & Matthew Scott Todd & Arnab Bhowmik & Lijun Wang, 2021. "Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L. (Hemp)—Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Hilary Mayton & Masoume Amirkhani & Michael Loos & Burton Johnson & John Fike & Chuck Johnson & Kevin Myers & Jennifer Starr & Gary C. Bergstrom & Alan Taylor, 2022. "Evaluation of Industrial Hemp Seed Treatments for Management of Damping-Off for Enhanced Stand Establishment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Patalee, Buddhika & Jeong, Hoyeon & Mark, Tyler, 2024. "What Makes Hemp Economically Attractive? A Case of Kentucky Hemp Farmers," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(2), May.
    9. Sinéad M. Madden & Alan Ryan & Patrick Walsh, 2022. "A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Wei Li & Yanpeng Wei & Jiale Zhao & Weiye Han & Ding Li & Jianzhong Wang & Mengfei Zhao & Lin Chen & Limei Chen & Lina Zhou, 2023. "Effects of Fertilization Mode on the Growth of Lactuca sativa L. and Soil Nutrients in Facilitated Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Michał Kubiś & Piotr Łapka & Łukasz Cieślikiewicz & Genadijs Sahmenko & Maris Sinka & Diana Bajare, 2022. "Analysis of the Thermal Conductivity of a Bio-Based Composite Made of Hemp Shives and a Magnesium Binder," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Chun Hua Julia Liu & Francesco Pomponi & Bernardino D’Amico, 2023. "The Extent to Which Hemp Insulation Materials Can Be Used in Canadian Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Teodoro Semeraro & Aurelia Scarano & Riccardo Buccolieri & Angelo Santino & Eeva Aarrevaara, 2021. "Planning of Urban Green Spaces: An Ecological Perspective on Human Benefits," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2157-:d:500981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.