IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i3p57-d1359685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Questionnaire Measuring Organizational Citizenship Behavior towards the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Candida Duarte Manuel

    (Lusófona University, BioRG-Bioengineering and Sustainability Research Group, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carla Rebelo Magalhães

    (Lusófona University, CETRAD, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal)

  • Claudia Maria Huber

    (Lusófona University, CETRAD, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal)

  • Lukáš Smerek

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, 97590 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Artur Fernandes Costa

    (Lusófona University, Civil Protection Department, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal)

  • José Ribeiro Alves

    (Lusófona University, Civil Protection Department, 4000-098 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Translation, adaptation, and validation of instruments for cross-cultural investigation requires a rigorous methodological procedure that should be carefully planned to deliver instruments with adequate reliability and validity. This process was applied to a questionnaire measuring Organizational Citizenship Behavior toward the Environment (OCBE), Organizational Identification (OI), Environmental Responsibility (ER), and Green Human Resources Management (GHRM) in Portuguese and Slovak organizations. Several methodological procedures for cross-cultural adaptation and validation of questionnaires were analyzed, most of which used independent translators, experts’ analysis, and backward translation to the original language. In the present study, a procedure adapted from Beaton et al. (2000) was applied successfully, and the blind backward translations; expert committee; and the two pretests to assess content validity, functional equivalence, and clarity proved to be worthy. The psychometric properties were measured using a sample from Portugal (N = 122) and Slovakia (N = 269). Although employees were perceiving neither a strong environmental responsibility of their organizations nor strong green human resources management, they identified themselves with the organizations and engaged in OCBEs. Comparing both countries, the factorial structure was remarkably similar, highlighting the eco-helping actions and eco-civic engagement of OCBEs. Comparing both countries, the factorial structure was remarkably similar, highlighting the eco-helping actions and eco-civic engagement of OCBEs. The results indicated that the translated instrument was functionally equivalent to the original one, valid (scale CVI/Ave > 0.83), and reliable (Scale Alpha > 0.733) for evaluating the effect of employee practices and organization management in promoting and supporting environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Candida Duarte Manuel & Carla Rebelo Magalhães & Claudia Maria Huber & Lukáš Smerek & Artur Fernandes Costa & José Ribeiro Alves, 2024. "Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Questionnaire Measuring Organizational Citizenship Behavior towards the Environment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-38, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:57-:d:1359685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/3/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/3/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Boiral & Pascal Paillé, 2012. "Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: Measurement and Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 431-445, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fathia Ardiza & Lenny C. Nawangsari & Ahmad H. Sutawidjaya, 2021. "The Influence of Green Performance Appraisal and Green Compensation to Improve Employee Performance through OCBE," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 13-22.
    2. DaYeon Choi & Insuk Lee & SangHoon Kang & HyunKue Lee, 2024. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Attribution on Socially Responsible Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Meaningfulness of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Talat Islam & Saima Ahmad & Ishfaq Ahmed, 2023. "Linking environment specific servant leadership with organizational environmental citizenship behavior: the roles of CSR and attachment anxiety," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 855-879, April.
    4. Weijiao Ye & Ziqiang Li, 2024. "The Impact of Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Employees’ Environmental Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Psychological Safety and Contingent Reward Leadership," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    5. Shuang Ren & Guiyao Tang & Susan Jackson, 2018. "Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 769-803, September.
    6. Pascal Paillé & Yang Chen & Olivier Boiral & Jiafei Jin, 2014. "The Impact of Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: An Employee-Level Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 451-466, May.
    7. Valeria D’Amato & Rita D’Ecclesia & Susanna Levantesi, 2021. "Fundamental ratios as predictors of ESG scores: a machine learning approach," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 1087-1110, December.
    8. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    9. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. S. Weaver & Pam Ellen & Lars Mathiassen, 2015. "Contextualist Inquiry into Organizational Citizenship: Promoting Recycling Across Heterogeneous Organizational Actors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 413-428, June.
    11. Yang Chen & Yanxia Wang & Fang Lee Cooke & Lin Lin & Pascal Paillé & Olivier Boiral, 2023. "Is abusive supervision harmful to organizational environmental performance? Evidence from China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 689-712, April.
    12. Bilal Afsar & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 109-125, January.
    13. Yuechao Du & Minghao Yan, 2022. "Green Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Taking Charge Behavior: The Mediating Role of Personal Initiative and the Moderating Role of Green Organizational Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Mou Lin & Azura Abdullah Effendi & Qaisar Iqbal, 2022. "The Mechanism Underlying the Sustainable Performance of Transformational Leadership: Organizational Identification as Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Eric Lamm & Jennifer Tosti-Kharas & Cynthia King, 2015. "Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 207-220, April.
    16. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Majed Abdulaziz Al Abdulathim & Nadia Rebhi Hussni Hasan & Maha Hassan Ahmed Salah & Howayda Said Ahmed Mohamed Ali & Nancy J. Kamel, 2023. "From Green Inclusive Leadership to Green Organizational Citizenship: Exploring the Mediating Role of Green Work Engagement and Green Organizational Identification in the Hotel Industry Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Francesco Testa & Niccolò Todaro & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Marco Frey, 2020. "Embedding corporate sustainability: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of organization citizenship behavior," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1198-1212, May.
    18. Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Asif, Muhammad & Montabon, Frank & Chatha, Kamran Ali, 2020. "The indirect effect of social responsibility standards on organizational performance in apparel supply chains: A developing country perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Luu Trong Tuan, 2021. "Effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green performance via green climate and green crafting," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 925-953, September.
    20. Pascal Paillé & Nicolas Raineri & Olivier Boiral, 2019. "Environmental Behavior On and Off the Job: A Configurational Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 253-268, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:57-:d:1359685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.