IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i2p63-d822964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Change Management Approach with the Support of the Balanced Scorecard and the Utilization of Artificial Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Alkinoos Psarras

    (Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Theodoros Anagnostopoulos

    (Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Ioannis Salmon

    (Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Yannis Psaromiligkos

    (Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Lazaros Vryzidis

    (Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the way organizations face decision-making issues. One of these crucial elements is the implementation of organizational changes. There has been a wide-spread adoption of AI techniques in the private sector, whereas in the public sector their use has been recently extended. One of the greatest challenges that European governments have to face is the implementation of a wide variety of European Union (EU) funding programs which have evolved in the context of the EU long-term budget. In the current study, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are intertwined with forecasting the outcomes of a co-financed EU program by means of its impact on the non-financial measures of the government body that materialized it. The predictive accuracy of the present model advanced in this research study takes into account all the complexities of the business environment, within which the provided dataset is produced. The outcomes of the study showed that the measures taken to enhance customer satisfaction allows for further improvement. The utilization of the proposed model could facilitate the decision-making process and initiate changes to the administrational issues of the available funding programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alkinoos Psarras & Theodoros Anagnostopoulos & Ioannis Salmon & Yannis Psaromiligkos & Lazaros Vryzidis, 2022. "A Change Management Approach with the Support of the Balanced Scorecard and the Utilization of Artificial Neural Networks," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:63-:d:822964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/2/63/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/2/63/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danilo Gambelli & Francesco Solfanelli & Stefano Orsini & Raffaele Zanoli, 2021. "Measuring the Economic Performance of Small Ruminant Farms Using Balanced Scorecard and Importance-Performance Analysis: A European Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Francesco D’Acunto & Nagpurnanand Prabhala & Alberto G Rossi, 2019. "The Promises and Pitfalls of Robo-Advising," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1983-2020.
    3. Kuziemski, Maciej & Misuraca, Gianluca, 2020. "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    4. Michaela Kotková Stříteská & Yee Yee Sein, 2021. "Performance Driven Culture in the Public Sector: The Case of Nordic Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioannis Kosmas & Theofanis Papadopoulos & Georgia Dede & Christos Michalakelis, 2023. "The Use of Artificial Neural Networks in the Public Sector," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Boudy Bilal & Kaan Yetilmezsoy & Mohammed Ouassaid, 2024. "Benchmarking of Various Flexible Soft-Computing Strategies for the Accurate Estimation of Wind Turbine Output Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-36, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jang Ho Kim & Yongjae Lee & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2022. "Goal-based investing based on multi-stage robust portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1141-1158, June.
    2. Itay Goldstein & Wei Jiang & G Andrew Karolyi, 2019. "To FinTech and Beyond," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1647-1661.
    3. Brenner, Lukas & Meyll, Tobias, 2020. "Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    4. Zhang, Junsheng & Peng, Zezhi & Zeng, Yamin & Yang, Haisheng, 2023. "Do big data mutual funds outperform?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Vesa Pursiainen & Jan Toczynski, 2023. "Retail Investors’ Cryptocurrency Investments," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-51, Swiss Finance Institute.
    6. Seiler, Volker & Fanenbruck, Katharina Maria, 2021. "Acceptance of digital investment solutions: The case of robo advisory in Germany," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Catherine D'Hondt & Rudy De Winne & Eric Ghysels & Steve Raymond, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence Alter Egos: Who benefits from Robo-investing?," Papers 1907.03370, arXiv.org.
    10. Xu, Chang & Jin, Long, 2024. "Effects of government digitalization on firm investment efficiency: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 819-834.
    11. Vasiliki Koniakou, 2023. "From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-102, February.
    12. Lambrecht, Marco & Oechssler, Jörg & Weidenholzer, Simon, 2023. "On the benefits of robo-advice in financial markets," Working Papers 0734, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    13. Christine Laudenbach & Michael Ungeheuer & Martin Weber, 2023. "How to Alleviate Correlation Neglect in Investment Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3400-3414, June.
    14. Xie, Xueyan & Zhu, Xiaoyang, 2022. "FinTech and capital allocation efficiency: Another equity-efficiency dilemma?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Buss, Adrian & Vilkov, Grigory & Uppal, Raman, 2020. "Investor Sophistication and Portfolio Dynamics," CEPR Discussion Papers 15116, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Christoph Keding, 2021. "Understanding the interplay of artificial intelligence and strategic management: four decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 91-134, February.
    17. Felix Holzmeister & Martin Holmén & Michael Kirchler & Matthias Stefan & Erik Wengström, 2023. "Delegation Decisions in Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4828-4844, August.
    18. William J. Bazley & Henrik Cronqvist & Milica Mormann, 2021. "Visual Finance: The Pervasive Effects of Red on Investor Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5616-5641, September.
    19. Toušek, Zdeněk & Hinke, Jana & Malinská, Barbora & Prokop, Martin, 2022. "Shareholder Value Generation within the Agro-Food Financial Supply Chain," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(3), September.
    20. D'Acunto, Francesco & Ghosh, Pulak & Jain, Rajiv & Rossi, Alberto G., 2022. "How costly are cultural biases?," LawFin Working Paper Series 34, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:63-:d:822964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.