IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fst/rfsisf/v14y2023i8p24-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of public audit - theories and empirical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Cîmpan

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Cătălin-Paul Păcuraru-Ionescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Sorin Nicolae Borlea

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania; Babes-Bolyai University, Institute of European Research, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Vasile Goldis "Western" University of Arad, Arad, Romania)

Abstract

This study is a review of the main issues in public audit. The theoretical concepts of operation, organizational differences, national and regional peculiarities, visions of specialists in the field, etc. are investigated. Practically all states in the world have institutions or commissions with the ability to check the bodies that work with public money. There are three basic models based on which any superior entity in the public audit functions: Westminster, the board of administration, and Napoleonic. Obviously, variations may appear. However, there are more and more trends of structural and functional similarity of higher institutions. Their sources are classified into three types of isomorphism: coercive, mimetic and normative. For a deeper analysis, we did not limit ourselves to findings of the structures, but we even addressed the theoretical bases of the necessity or value of the public audit. Within the broader framework of neo-institutional theory, we have reviewed six economic and administrative theories that could explain the demand for public audit: agency theory, signal theory, assurance theory, management control theory, governance theory, and confirmation theory. In order not to remain only in the strictly theoretical framework, we also discussed the opinions of specialists working in the field, expressed through a questionnaire administered by the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. The conclusions try to foreshadow some future trends in public audit, under the pressure of current economic transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Cîmpan & Cătălin-Paul Păcuraru-Ionescu & Sorin Nicolae Borlea, 2023. "The value of public audit - theories and empirical evidence," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 14(8), pages 24-36, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:14:y:2023:i:8:p:24-36
    DOI: 10.55654/JFS.2023.8.14.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revista.isfin.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2.-Cimpan-Pacuraru-Borlea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revista.isfin.ro/2023/05/20/the-value-of-public-audit-theories-and-empirical-evidence/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55654/JFS.2023.8.14.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samsonova-Taddei, Anna & Humphrey, Christopher, 2015. "Risk and the construction of a European audit policy agenda: The case of auditor liability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 55-72.
    2. Neva Bojovic & Corine Genet & Valerie Sabatier, 2018. "Learning, signaling, and convincing: The role of experimentation in the business modeling process," Post-Print hal-01591698, HAL.
    3. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    4. Maarten Corten & Tensie Steijvers & Nadine Lybaert, 2018. "Auditor choice in private firms: a stakeholders perspective," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 146-170, February.
    5. MohammadRezaei, Fakhroddin & Mohd-Saleh, Norman & Ahmed, Kamran, 2018. "Audit Firm Ranking, Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Examining Conflicting Price Discrimination Views," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 295-313.
    6. Soma Pillay & P. S. Reddy & Damian Morgan, 2017. "Institutional isomorphism and whistle-blowing intentions in public sector institutions," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 423-442, April.
    7. Nisansala Wijekoon & Grant Samkin & Umesh Sharma, 2021. "International financial reporting standards for small and medium-sized entities: a new institutional sociology perspective," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(5), pages 1265-1290, June.
    8. repec:eme:maj000:maj-03-2017-1535 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sheila Ellwood & Javier Garcia-Lacalle, 2016. "Examining Audit Committees in the Corporate Governance of Public Bodies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1138-1162, September.
    10. Elisa Bonollo, 2019. "Measuring supreme audit institutions’ outcomes: current literature and future insights," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 468-477, October.
    11. Neva Bojovic & Corine Genet & Valerie Sabatier, 2018. "Learning, signaling, and convincing: The role of experimentation in the business modeling process," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01591698, HAL.
    12. Taj, Saud A., 2016. "Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 338-348.
    13. Md. Mamunur Rashid, 2020. "Financial reporting quality and share price movement-evidence from listed companies in Bangladesh," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 425-458, May.
    14. Michael Spence, 1973. "Job Market Signaling," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(3), pages 355-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nor 'Asyiqin Binti Abu & Ainol Sarina Ahmad Zazili & Enylina Nordin Nordin & Wan Shafizah Hussain & Siti Aisyah Basri, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Reports on Government Accountability," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 137-150.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:8:y:2023:i:14:p:24-36 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kim, Sang-Joon & Bae, John & Oh, Hannah, 2019. "Financing strategically: The moderation effect of marketing activities on the bifurcated relationship between debt level and firm valuation of small and medium enterprises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 663-681.
    3. Mustaruddin Mustaruddin & Aristya Dinata & Wendy Wendy & Anwar Azazi, 2017. "Asymmetric Information and Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(6), pages 8-15.
    4. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    5. Raminder Kaur Bhatia & Prabhnoor Singh, 2024. "Relationship Between Bank-Specific Characteristics and Web-Based Disclosures of the Commercial Banks in India," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 13(1), pages 7-29, June.
    6. Hanna Hottenrott & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2016. "Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 197-217, April.
    7. Francois Lantin & Pierre Roy, 2007. "L'impact de la notation financière sur les stratégies de croissance externe," Post-Print halshs-00692570, HAL.
    8. Yli-Renko, Helena & Denoo, Lien & Janakiraman, Ramkumar, 2020. "A knowledge-based view of managing dependence on a key customer: Survival and growth outcomes for young firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    9. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    10. Mafumbate J & Ndlovu U & Mafuka A & Gavhure P, 2017. "The Influence of Firm Specific Determinants on Financial Performance in the Power Industry," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(5), pages 18-28.
    11. Steele C. West & Amin W. Mugera & Ross S. Kingwell, 2021. "Drivers of farm business capital structure and its speed of adjustment: evidence from Western Australia’s Wheatbelt," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(2), pages 391-412, April.
    12. Saoussen Boujelben & Hela Khemakhem-Feki & Ahmad Alqatan, 2020. "Real earnings management and the relevance of operating cash flows: A study of french listed firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 218-229, December.
    13. Roberto Carlos Klann & Ilse Maria Beuren, 2011. "Characteristics of companies that influence their voluntary disclosure of performance indicators," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 8(2), pages 92-113, April.
    14. Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa, 2015. "Extant Reviews on Entry-mode/Internationalization, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Diversification: Understanding Theories and Establishing Interdisciplinary Research," MPRA Paper 63744, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    15. Min Chung Han, 2021. "Thumbs down on “likes”? The impact of Facebook reactions on online consumers’ nonprofit engagement behavior," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(2), pages 255-272, June.
    16. Imhof, Michael J. & Seavey, Scott E., 2014. "Corporate risk-taking, firm value and high levels of managerial earnings forecasts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 328-337.
    17. Virginie Baritaux & Magali Aubert & Etienne Montaigne & Hervé Remaud, 2006. "Matchmakers in wine marketing channels: The case of French wine brokers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 375-390.
    18. Welter, Chris & Holcomb, Tim R. & McIlwraith, John, 2023. "The inefficiencies of venture capital funding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    19. Ferguson, Andrew & Feigin, Alexey & Kean, Stephen, 2013. "Gold mine feasibility study disclosure in Australia: Determinants and implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 8-17.
    20. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Hussainey, Khaled & Nawaz, Tasawar & Ntim, Collins & Elamer, Ahmed, 2022. "A systematic literature review on risk disclosure research: State-of-the-art and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    21. Jiri Chod & Evgeny Lyandres, 2021. "A Theory of ICOs: Diversification, Agency, and Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 5969-5989, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:14:y:2023:i:8:p:24-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isfinro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.