IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v18y2016i8p1138-1162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Audit Committees in the Corporate Governance of Public Bodies

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila Ellwood
  • Javier Garcia-Lacalle

Abstract

Public bodies have adopted corporate governance regimes from the private sector assuming that accountability and performance will be improved. This paper analyses audit committees in a local public body context, NHS foundation trusts (FTs). Audit committees play a key role in enhancing governance. FTs follow the recommendations made by Monitor, their independent regulator. FTs, however, appear to adapt the role of the audit committee to meet the accountability needs of the wider stakeholders of public hospitals. Audit committees assure (vertical) financial accountability, and also provide assurance along horizontal lines of accountability to local communities, professional bodies and other stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila Ellwood & Javier Garcia-Lacalle, 2016. "Examining Audit Committees in the Corporate Governance of Public Bodies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1138-1162, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:18:y:2016:i:8:p:1138-1162
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1088566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2015.1088566
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2015.1088566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marius Cîmpan & Cătălin-Paul Păcuraru-Ionescu & Sorin Nicolae Borlea, 2023. "The value of public audit - theories and empirical evidence," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 14(8), pages 24-36, May.
    2. Cecilia Langella & Eugenio Anessi Pessina & Elena Cant?, 2020. "Caratteristiche e attivit? del Collegio Sindacale nelle aziende sanitarie pubbliche italiane," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(116), pages 53-73.
    3. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:8:y:2023:i:14:p:24-36 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Carrera, Nieves & Mareque, Mercedes, 2023. "Does gender affect qualifying decisions? Evidence from public sector audits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:18:y:2016:i:8:p:1138-1162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.