IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v20y1999i4p297-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Macintosh
  • Donald Maclean

Abstract

This paper presents a novel framework for the management of organizational transformation, defined here as a relatively rapid transition from one archetype to another. The concept of dissipative structures, from the field of complexity theory, is used to develop and explain a specific sequence of activities which underpin effective transformation. This sequence integrates selected concepts from the literatures on strategic change, organizational learning, and business processes; in so doing, it introduces a degree of prescriptiveness which differentiates it from other managerial interpretations of complexity theory. Specifically, it proposes a three‐stage process: first, the organization ‘conditions’ the outcome of the transformation process by articulating and reconfiguring the rules which underpin its deep structure; second, it takes steps to move from its current equilibrium; and, finally, it moves into a period where positive and negative feedback loops become the focus of managerial attention. The paper argues that by managing at the level of deep structure in social systems, organizations can gain some influence over self‐organizing processes which are typically regarded as unpredictable in the natural sciences. However, the paper further argues that this influence is limited to archetypal features and that detailed forms and behaviors are emergent properties of the system. Two illustrative case vignettes are presented to give an insight into the practical application of the model before conclusions are reached which speculate on the implications of this approach for strategy research. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Macintosh & Donald Maclean, 1999. "Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 297-316, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:20:y:1999:i:4:p:297-316
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:43.0.CO;2-Q
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:43.0.CO;2-Q
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:43.0.CO;2-Q?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Salvador, Antonio & Knipe, Dar & Kendall, Elaine, 2002. "Structural Change Or Logical Incrementalism? Turbulence In The Global Meat System," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19704, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Stephen L. Vargo & Linda Peters & Hans Kjellberg & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Suvi Nenonen & Francesco Polese & Debora Sarno & Claudia Vaughan, 2023. "Emergence in marketing: an institutional and ecosystem framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 2-22, January.
    3. Robin T. Byerly & Bruce T. Lamont & Terrill Keasler, 2003. "Business portfolio restructuring, prior diversification posture and investor reactions," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 535-548.
    4. MacLean, Donald, 2017. "Capacidades dinâmicas, ação criativa e poética," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 57(3), May.
    5. Benyamin Lichtenstein, 2018. "Bringing Complexity into Social Analysis: Three Principles from Emergence Benyamin Lichtenstein," Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(5), pages 98-100, September.
    6. Bill McKelvey & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein & Pierpaolo Andriani, 2012. "When organisations and ecosystems interact: toward a law of requisite fractality in firms," International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 104-136.
    7. Rullani, Francesco & Haefliger, Stefan, 2013. "The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 941-953.
    8. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Kane, Samuel, 2002. "The Farm Business Environment and New Generation Cooperatives as an Innovation Strategy," 2002 Annual Meeting, November 13 31826, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    9. Polese, Francesco & Payne, Adrian & Frow, Pennie & Sarno, Debora & Nenonen, Suvi, 2021. "Emergence and phase transitions in service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 25-34.
    10. Steven E. Wallis & Vladislav Valentinov, 2017. "A Limit to Our Thinking and Some Unanticipated Moral Consequences: A Science of Conceptual Systems Perspective with Some Potential Solutions," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 103-116, April.
    11. Todd H. Chiles & Alan D. Meyer & Thomas J. Hench, 2004. "Organizational Emergence: The Origin and Transformation of Branson, Missouri's Musical Theaters," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 499-519, October.
    12. MacLean, Donald & MacIntosh, Robert, 2015. "Planning reconsidered: Paradox, poetry and people at the edge of strategy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 72-78.
    13. Branislav Micieta & Honorata Howaniec & Vladimíra Binasova & Marta Kasajova & Miroslav Fusko, 2021. "Increasing Work Efficiency in a Manufacturing Setting Using Gemba Walk," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 601-620.
    14. Jonathan Levie & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein, 2010. "A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 317-350, March.
    15. Steven E. Wallis, 2020. "Integrative Propositional Analysis for developing capacity in an academic research institution by improving strategic planning," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 56-67, January.
    16. A. Georges L. Romme, 2003. "Making a Difference: Organization as Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 558-573, October.
    17. Yi Yang, 2021. "Critical realism and complexity theory: Building a nonconstructivist systems research framework for effective governance analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 177-183, January.
    18. Ion Stegaroiu & Valentin Radu & Hamit Simsek & Alina Iuliana Tabirca, 2020. "Impact of Leadership Team Values and Performance on Organizational Behavior," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Ioana PANAGORET & Gabriel GORGHIU (ed.), International Conference Globalization, Innovation and Development. Trends and Prospects (G.I.D.T.P.), edition 1, volume 10, chapter 27, pages 241-251, Editura Lumen.
    19. Habbershon, Timothy G. & Williams, Mary & MacMillan, Ian C., 2003. "A unified systems perspective of family firm performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 451-465, July.
    20. Parrish, Bradley D., 2010. "Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 510-523, September.
    21. Kroh, Julia, 2021. "Sustain(able) urban (eco)systems: Stakeholder-related success factors in urban innovation projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    22. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    23. Balkiz Yapicioglu, 2023. "Navigating Turbulent Environments: Exploring Resilience in SMEs through Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:20:y:1999:i:4:p:297-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.