IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v99y2020icp336-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cost-benefit analysis of fuel-switching vs. hybrid scrubber installation: A container route through the Chinese SECA case

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Lixian
  • Gu, Bingmei
  • Luo, Meifeng

Abstract

The shipping industry has been subjected to significant pressure with the increasingly stringent environmental regulations. All vessels must comply with the IMO 2020 Sulfur cap—using fuel with less than 0.5% of sulfur content in international navigation, and 0.1% within Sulfur Emission Control Areas (SECAs). Ship operators must select the most cost-effective compliance option for their vessels, especially in the current sluggish market. This research uses a cost–benefit framework to analyze ship operators’ compliance options of fuel-switching versus hybrid scrubbers, and applies these to a specific liner route through the Chinese SECA. The study considers the impacts of the proportion of the entire round trip that is a designated SECA; price differences between low- and high-sulfur fuels; loading factors; freight rates and discount rates on compliance options; and possible impacts of investment cost or government subsidies on scrubber installation. Based on the current conditions, fuel-switching is found to be the best compliance option on the specific route. However, the SECA proportion, a high price difference between low- and high-sulfur fuel, or a low scrubber cost can make scrubbers a better option. In addition, from the perspective of reducing sulfur oxide and carbon dioxide emissions, the scrubber option is always preferable. This highlights the importance of providing government subsidies for scrubbers in order to reduce environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Lixian & Gu, Bingmei & Luo, Meifeng, 2020. "A cost-benefit analysis of fuel-switching vs. hybrid scrubber installation: A container route through the Chinese SECA case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 336-344.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:99:y:2020:i:c:p:336-344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X19308832
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jong-Kyun Woo & Daniel Seong-Hyeok Moon, 2014. "The effects of slow steaming on the environmental performance in liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 176-191, March.
    2. Zavitsas, Konstantinos & Zis, Thalis & Bell, Michael G.H., 2018. "The impact of flexible environmental policy on maritime supply chain resilience," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 116-128.
    3. Koesler, Simon & Achtnicht, Martin & Köhler, Jonathan, 2015. "Course set for a cap? A case study among ship operators on a maritime ETS," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 20-30.
    4. Océane Balland & Stein Ove Erikstad & Kjetil Fagerholt, 2012. "Optimized selection of air emission controls for vessels," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 387-400, July.
    5. Zis, Thalis P.V., 2019. "Prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 82-95.
    6. Lindstad, Elizabeth & Rehn, Carl Fredrik & Eskeland, Gunnar S., 2017. "Sulphur Abatement Globally in Maritime Shipping," Discussion Papers 2017/8, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    7. Harilaos N. Psaraftis, 2019. "Speed Optimization vs Speed Reduction: the Choice between Speed Limits and a Bunker Levy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Zoi Nikopoulou, 2017. "Incremental costs for reduction of air pollution from ships: a case study on North European emission control area," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1056-1077, November.
    9. Océane Balland & Cecilia Girard & Stein Ove Erikstad & Kjetil Fagerholt, 2015. "Optimized selection of vessel air emission controls--moving beyond cost-efficiency," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 362-376, May.
    10. Tichavska, Miluše & Tovar, Beatriz & Gritsenko, Daria & Johansson, Lasse & Jalkanen, Jukka Pekka, 2019. "Air emissions from ships in port: Does regulation make a difference?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 128-140.
    11. Gu, Yewen & Wallace, Stein W., 2017. "Scrubber: a potentially overestimated compliance method for the Emission Control Areas - The importance of involving a ship's sailing pattern in the evaluation," Discussion Papers 2017/13, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheng, Dian & Wang, YiYao & Wang, Hua & Liu, Baoli & Tang, Tianpei, 2024. "Enforcement of the global sulphur cap: Can self-reporting provide a better solution?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Tan, Zhijia & Zeng, Xianyang & Shao, Shuai & Chen, Jihong & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Scrubber installation and green fuel for inland river ships with non-identical streamflow," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Zhang, Ming & Zeng, Xianyang & Tan, Zhijia, 2024. "Joint decision of green technology adoption and sailing pattern for a coastal ship under ECAs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 102-113.
    4. Gong, Xu & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2022. "Determination of subsidy and emission control coverage under competition and cooperation of China-Europe Railway Express and liner shipping," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 323-335.
    5. Tan, Zhijia & Zhang, Ming & Shao, Shuai & Liang, Jinpeng & Sheng, Dian, 2022. "Evasion strategy for a coastal cargo ship with unpunctual arrival penalty under sulfur emission regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Mardones, Cristian, 2021. "Ex-post evaluation and cost-benefit analysis of a heater replacement program implemented in southern Chile," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Akoh Fabien Yao & Maxime Sèbe & Laura Recuero Virto & Abdelhak Nassiri & Hervé Dumez, 2024. "The effect of LNG bunkering on port competitiveness using multilevel data analysis [L'effet du soutage par GNL sur la compétitivité des ports à l'aide de l'analyse de données à plusieurs niveaux]," Post-Print hal-04611804, HAL.
    8. Zeng, Xianyang & Tan, Zhijia & Zhang, Ming & Wang, Tingsong, 2024. "Scrubber installation of inland container ships: Discrepancy between government and carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ming & Zeng, Xianyang & Tan, Zhijia, 2024. "Joint decision of green technology adoption and sailing pattern for a coastal ship under ECAs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 102-113.
    2. Lixian Fan & Bingmei Gu, 2019. "Impacts of the Increasingly Strict Sulfur Limit on Compliance Option Choices: The Case Study of Chinese SECA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Sheng, Dian & Li, Zhi-Chun & Fu, Xiaowen & Gillen, David, 2017. "Modeling the effects of unilateral and uniform emission regulations under shipping company and port competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 99-114.
    4. Gong, Xu & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2022. "Determination of subsidy and emission control coverage under competition and cooperation of China-Europe Railway Express and liner shipping," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 323-335.
    5. Shuaian Wang & Dan Zhuge & Lu Zhen & Chung-Yee Lee, 2021. "Liner Shipping Service Planning Under Sulfur Emission Regulations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 491-509, March.
    6. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Monios, Jason & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2021. "Competing institutional logics and institutional erosion in environmental governance of maritime transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Yu Yong Ung & Park Sung Ho & Jung Dong Ho & Lee Chang Hee, 2020. "Improving Liquefied Natural Gas Bunkering in Korea through the Chinese and Japanese Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Theodoros C. Zannis & John S. Katsanis & Georgios P. Christopoulos & Elias A. Yfantis & Roussos G. Papagiannakis & Efthimios G. Pariotis & Dimitrios C. Rakopoulos & Constantine D. Rakopoulos & Athanas, 2022. "Marine Exhaust Gas Treatment Systems for Compliance with the IMO 2020 Global Sulfur Cap and Tier III NO x Limits: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-49, May.
    10. Li, Lingyue & Gao, Suixiang & Yang, Wenguo & Xiong, Xing, 2020. "Ship’s response strategy to emission control areas: From the perspective of sailing pattern optimization and evasion strategy selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Qinghe Sun & Li Chen & Mabel C. Chou & Qiang Meng, 2023. "Mitigating the financial risk behind emission cap compliance: A case in maritime transportation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 283-300, January.
    12. Anna Lunde Hermansson & Ida-Maja Hassellöv & Tiia Grönholm & Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen & Erik Fridell & Rasmus Parsmo & Jesper Hassellöv & Erik Ytreberg, 2024. "Strong economic incentives of ship scrubbers promoting pollution," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 812-822, June.
    13. Gu, Yewen & Wallace, Stein W. & Wang, Xin, 2018. "Can an Emission Trading Scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and deployment model," Discussion Papers 2018/10, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    14. Hui-Huang Tai & Yun-Hua Chang, 2022. "Reducing pollutant emissions from vessel maneuvering in port areas," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 651-671, September.
    15. Patrizia Serra & Gianfranco Fancello, 2020. "Towards the IMO’s GHG Goals: A Critical Overview of the Perspectives and Challenges of the Main Options for Decarbonizing International Shipping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-32, April.
    16. Dan Zhuge & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen & Gilbert Laporte, 2021. "Subsidy design in a vessel speed reduction incentive program under government policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(3), pages 344-358, April.
    17. Zeng, Xianyang & Tan, Zhijia & Zhang, Ming & Wang, Tingsong, 2024. "Scrubber installation of inland container ships: Discrepancy between government and carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Tan, Zhijia & Zeng, Xianyang & Shao, Shuai & Chen, Jihong & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Scrubber installation and green fuel for inland river ships with non-identical streamflow," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Thalis P. V. Zis & Harilaos N. Psaraftis, 2022. "Impacts of short-term measures to decarbonize maritime transport on perishable cargoes," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 602-629, September.
    20. Nestor Goicoechea & Luis María Abadie, 2021. "Optimal Slow Steaming Speed for Container Ships under the EU Emission Trading System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:99:y:2020:i:c:p:336-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.