IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v56y2013icp15-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quadratic approximation and convergence of some bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Jun
  • Nie, Yu (Marco)
  • Yang, Xiaoguang

Abstract

This paper first shows that LUCE (Gentile, 2012), a recent addition to the family of bush-based algorithms, is closely related to OBA (Bar-Gera, 2002). LUCE’s promise comes mainly from its use of the greedy method for solving the quadratic approximation of node-based subproblems, which determines the search direction. While the greedy algorithm accelerates the solution of the subproblems and reduces the cost of line search, it unexpectedly disrupts the overall convergence performance in our experiments, which consistently show that LUCE failed to converge beyond certain threshold of relative gap. Our analysis suggests that the root cause to this interesting behavior is the inaccurate quadratic approximation constructed on faulty information of second-order derivatives. Because the quadratic approximations themselves are inaccurate, the search directions generated from them are sub-optimal. Unlike OBA, however, LUCE does not have a mechanism to correct these search directions through line search, which explains why its convergence performance suffers the observed breakdowns. We also attempt to improve LUCE using the ideas that have been experimented for the improvement of OBA. While these improvements do work, their effects are not enough to counteract the inability to adjust sub-optimal search directions. Importantly, the fact that the search direction has to be corrected in line search to ensure smooth convergence attests to the limitation of origin-based flow aggregation shared by both OBA and LUCE. These findings offer guidelines for the design of high performance traffic assignment algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Jun & Nie, Yu (Marco) & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2013. "Quadratic approximation and convergence of some bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 15-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:56:y:2013:i:c:p:15-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261513001148
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiess, Heinz & Florian, Michael, 1989. "Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 83-102, April.
    2. Jayakrishnan, R. & Tsai, Wei T. & Prashker, Joseph N. & Rajadhyaksha, Subodh, 1994. "A Faster Path-Based Algorithm for Traffic Assignment," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2hf4541x, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Torbjörn Larsson & Michael Patriksson, 1992. "Simplicial Decomposition with Disaggregated Representation for the Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 4-17, February.
    4. Bar-Gera, Hillel, 2010. "Traffic assignment by paired alternative segments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1022-1046, September.
    5. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2010. "A class of bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 73-89, January.
    6. Hillel Bar-Gera, 2002. "Origin-Based Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 398-417, November.
    7. Dial, Robert B., 2006. "A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 917-936, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Honggang & Zhang, Kai & Zhou, Zihan, 2023. "Integrating alternating direction method of multipliers and bush for solving the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Wang, Xiaolei & Wang, Jun & Guo, Lei & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2021. "A convex programming approach for ridesharing user equilibrium under fixed driver/rider demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 33-51.
    3. Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Xinyuan & Hu, Jintao & Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Honggang, 2023. "An alternating direction method of multipliers for solving user equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1072-1084.
    4. Xie, Chi, 2016. "New insights and improvements of using paired alternative segments for traffic assignmentAuthor-Name: Xie, Jun," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 406-424.
    5. Yuan, Yun & Yu, Jie, 2018. "Locating transit hubs in a multi-modal transportation network: A cluster-based optimization approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 85-103.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Xinyuan & Hu, Jintao & Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Honggang, 2023. "An alternating direction method of multipliers for solving user equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1072-1084.
    3. Xie, Chi, 2016. "New insights and improvements of using paired alternative segments for traffic assignmentAuthor-Name: Xie, Jun," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 406-424.
    4. Jafari, Ehsan & Pandey, Venktesh & Boyles, Stephen D., 2017. "A decomposition approach to the static traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 270-296.
    5. Zheng, Hong & Peeta, Srinivas, 2014. "Cost scaling based successive approximation algorithm for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 17-30.
    6. Zhang, Honggang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Jian & Wu, Yunchi, 2023. "A novel flow update policy in solving traffic assignment problems: Successive over relaxation iteration method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Yu (Marco) Nie, 2012. "A Note on Bar-Gera's Algorithm for the Origin-Based Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 27-38, February.
    8. Bar-Gera, Hillel & Boyce, David & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2012. "User-equilibrium route flows and the condition of proportionality," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 440-462.
    9. Smith, Mike & Mounce, Richard, 2011. "A splitting rate model of traffic re-routeing and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1389-1409.
    10. Liu, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Honggang & Zhang, Kai & Zhou, Zihan, 2023. "Integrating alternating direction method of multipliers and bush for solving the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Bar-Gera, Hillel, 2010. "Traffic assignment by paired alternative segments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1022-1046, September.
    12. David Di Lorenzo & Alessandro Galligari & Marco Sciandrone, 2015. "A convergent and efficient decomposition method for the traffic assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 151-170, January.
    13. Shen, Wei & Wynter, Laura, 2012. "A new one-level convex optimization approach for estimating origin–destination demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1535-1555.
    14. Jun Xie & Yu (Marco) Nie, 2019. "A New Algorithm for Achieving Proportionality in User Equilibrium Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 566-584, March.
    15. Rinaldi, Marco & Tampère, Chris M.J. & Viti, Francesco, 2018. "On characterizing the relationship between route choice behaviour and optimal traffic control solution space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 892-906.
    16. Liu, Ronghui & Smith, Mike, 2015. "Route choice and traffic signal control: A study of the stability and instability of a new dynamical model of route choice and traffic signal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 123-145.
    17. Taesung Hwang, 2021. "Assignment of Freight Truck Shipment on the U.S. Highway Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2010. "A class of bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 73-89, January.
    19. Maria Mitradjieva & Per Olov Lindberg, 2013. "The Stiff Is Moving---Conjugate Direction Frank-Wolfe Methods with Applications to Traffic Assignment ," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 280-293, May.
    20. Jafari, Ehsan & Boyles, Stephen D., 2016. "Improved bush-based methods for network contraction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 298-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:56:y:2013:i:c:p:15-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.