IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v186y2024ics0191261524001310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is order-2 proportionality good enough for approximating the most likely path flow in user equilibrium traffic assignment?

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Liyang
  • Xie, Jun
  • Liu, Xiaobo
  • Tang, Youhua
  • Wang, David Z.W.
  • Nie, Yu (Marco)

Abstract

The proportionality condition is a standard approach to dealing with the non-uniqueness issue in the user equilibrium (UE) traffic assignment problems (TAP). Although the proportionality condition can reduce the degree of arbitrariness, it remains unclear how much arbitrariness remains and whether it can meaningfully affect model outcomes and relevant decisions that depend on them. The answers to these questions are impeded by the lack of an efficient algorithm that can find the exact maximum entropy UE path flow solution for networks of practical size. In this paper, we fill this gap by developing a high-performance augmented Lagrangian algorithm that effectively exploits the special problem structure. Our numerical results reveal that there are a considerable number of links with non-negligible arbitrariness in the solution generated by the proportionality condition, and that this problem becomes worse if the level of congestion increases in the network. Since about a decade ago, many practitioners have relied on state-of-the-art traffic assignment tools based on the proportionality condition to perform select link analysis, among other applications. The results reported herein are a reminder that their toolbox may need reevaluation and perhaps an upgrade.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Liyang & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Tang, Youhua & Wang, David Z.W. & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2024. "Is order-2 proportionality good enough for approximating the most likely path flow in user equilibrium traffic assignment?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524001310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.103007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524001310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.