IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v35y2001i2p183-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MASTER: macroscopic traffic simulation based on a gas-kinetic, non-local traffic model

Author

Listed:
  • Helbing, Dirk
  • Hennecke, Ansgar
  • Shvetsov, Vladimir
  • Treiber, Martin

Abstract

We present a gas-kinetic (Boltzmann-like) traffic equation that is not only suited for low vehicle densities, but also for the high-density regime, as it takes into account the forwardly directed interactions, effects of vehicular space requirements like increased interaction rates, and effects of velocity correlations that reflect the bunching of cars, at least partially. From this gas-kinetic equation, we systematically derive the related macroscopic traffic equations. The corresponding partial differential equations for the vehicle density and average velocity are directly related to the quantities characterizing individual driver-vehicle behavior, and, as we show by calibration of the model, their optimal values have the expected order of magnitude. Therefore, the model allows to investigate the influences of varying street and weather conditions or freeway control measures. We point out that, because of the forwardly directed interactions, the macroscopic equations contain non-local instead of diffusion or viscosity terms. This resolves some of the inconsistencies found in previous models and allows for a fast and robust numerical integration, so that several thousand freeway kilometers can be simulated in real-time. It turns out that the model is in good agreement with the experimentally observed properties of freeway traffic flow. In particular, it reproduces the characteristic outflow and dissolution velocity of traffic jams, as well as the phase transition to "synchronized" congested traffic. We also reproduce the five different kinds of congested states that have been found close to on-ramps (or bottlenecks) and present a "phase diagram" of the different traffic states in dependence of the main flow and the ramp flow, showing that congested states are often induced by perturbations in the traffic flow. Finally, we introduce generalized macroscopic equations for multi-lane and multi-userclass traffic. With these, we investigate the differences between multi-lane simulations and simulations of the effective one-lane model.

Suggested Citation

  • Helbing, Dirk & Hennecke, Ansgar & Shvetsov, Vladimir & Treiber, Martin, 2001. "MASTER: macroscopic traffic simulation based on a gas-kinetic, non-local traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 183-211, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:35:y:2001:i:2:p:183-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(99)00047-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Lin, Wei-Hua & Del Castillo, Jose M., 1997. "A simple physical principle for the simulation of freeways with special lanes and priority vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 103-125, April.
    2. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part III: Multi-destination flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 305-313, August.
    3. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 289-303, August.
    4. Michalopoulos, Panos G. & Beskos, Dimitrios E. & Yamauchi, Yasuji, 1984. "Multilane traffic flow dynamics: Some macroscopic considerations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 377-395.
    5. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    6. Helbing, Dirk, 1996. "Derivation and empirical validation of a refined traffic flow model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 253-282.
    7. Helbing, Dirk, 1997. "Modeling multi-lane traffic flow with queuing effects," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 175-194.
    8. Holland, Edward N. & Woods, Andrew W., 1997. "A continuum model for the dispersion of traffic on two-lane roads," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 473-485, November.
    9. Daganzo, C. F. & Cassidy, M. J. & Bertini, R. L., 1999. "Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 365-379, June.
    10. Maria Lampis, 1978. "On the Kinetic Theory of Traffic Flow in the Case of a Nonnegligible Number of Queueing Vehicles," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 16-28, February.
    11. Hilliges, Martin & Weidlich, Wolfgang, 1995. "A phenomenological model for dynamic traffic flow in networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 407-431, December.
    12. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    13. Islam, M. N. & Consul, P. C., 1991. "The consul distribution as a bunching model in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 365-372, October.
    14. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "Requiem for second-order fluid approximations of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 277-286, August.
    15. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    16. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 281-287, August.
    17. Dirk Helbing & Bernardo A. Huberman, 1998. "Coherent moving states in highway traffic," Nature, Nature, vol. 396(6713), pages 738-740, December.
    18. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1997. "A continuum theory of traffic dynamics for freeways with special lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 83-102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yunong & Cheng, Rongjun & Ge, Hongxia, 2017. "A lattice hydrodynamic model based on delayed feedback control considering the effect of flow rate difference," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 478-484.
    2. Laval, Jorge A. & Toth, Christopher S. & Zhou, Yi, 2014. "A parsimonious model for the formation of oscillations in car-following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 228-238.
    3. Jiang, Rui & Wu, Qing-Song, 2003. "Study on propagation speed of small disturbance from a car-following approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 85-99, January.
    4. Mohammadian, Saeed & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Bhaskar, Ashish, 2021. "Performance of continuum models for realworld traffic flows: Comprehensive benchmarking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 132-167.
    5. Schönhof, Martin & Helbing, Dirk, 2009. "Criticism of three-phase traffic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 784-797, August.
    6. Ngoduy, D. & Hoogendoorn, S.P. & Liu, R., 2009. "Continuum modeling of cooperative traffic flow dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(13), pages 2705-2716.
    7. Oliver Kunze & Fabian Frommer, 2021. "The Matrix vs. The Fifth Element—Assessing Future Scenarios of Urban Transport from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Sun, Lu & Jafaripournimchahi, Ammar & Kornhauser, Alain & Hu, Wushen, 2020. "A new higher-order viscous continuum traffic flow model considering driver memory in the era of autonomous and connected vehicles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    9. Fan, Hongqiang & Jia, Bin & Tian, Junfang & Yun, Lifen, 2014. "Characteristics of traffic flow at a non-signalized intersection in the framework of game theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 172-180.
    10. Krzysztof J. Szajowski & Kinga Włodarczyk, 2020. "Drivers’ Skills and Behavior vs. Traffic at Intersections," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Jorge A. Laval & Bhargava R. Chilukuri, 2014. "The Distribution of Congestion on a Class of Stochastic Kinematic Wave Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 217-224, May.
    12. Zhou, Yang & Ahn, Soyoung & Wang, Meng & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2020. "Stabilizing mixed vehicular platoons with connected automated vehicles: An H-infinity approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 152-170.
    13. Martin Schönhof & Dirk Helbing, 2007. "Empirical Features of Congested Traffic States and Their Implications for Traffic Modeling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 135-166, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xingliang Liu & Jian Wang & Tangzhi Liu & Jin Xu, 2021. "Forecasting Spatiotemporal Boundary of Emergency-Event-Based Traffic Congestion in Expressway Network Considering Highway Node Acceptance Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2018. "Dynamic factor model for network traffic state forecast," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 281-317.
    4. Jin, Wen-Long & Zhang, H. Michael, 2013. "An instantaneous kinematic wave theory of diverging traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-16.
    5. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    6. Canepa, Edward S. & Claudel, Christian G., 2017. "Networked traffic state estimation involving mixed fixed-mobile sensor data using Hamilton-Jacobi equations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 686-709.
    7. Jiang, Chenming & Bhat, Chandra R. & Lam, William H.K., 2020. "A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 268-291.
    8. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    9. Ngoduy, D. & Hoang, N.H. & Vu, H.L. & Watling, D., 2016. "Optimal queue placement in dynamic system optimum solutions for single origin-destination traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 148-169.
    10. Wong, S. C. & Wong, G. C. K., 2002. "An analytical shock-fitting algorithm for LWR kinematic wave model embedded with linear speed-density relationship," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 683-706, September.
    11. Jin, Wen-Long, 2010. "A kinematic wave theory of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1001-1021, September.
    12. Blandin, Sébastien & Argote, Juan & Bayen, Alexandre M. & Work, Daniel B., 2013. "Phase transition model of non-stationary traffic flow: Definition, properties and solution method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 31-55.
    13. Tumash, Liudmila & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Delle Monache, Maria Laura, 2022. "Multi-directional continuous traffic model for large-scale urban networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 374-402.
    14. Raadsen, Mark P.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Bell, Michael G.H., 2016. "An efficient and exact event-based algorithm for solving simplified first order dynamic network loading problems in continuous time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 191-210.
    15. Jin, Wen-Long, 2013. "A multi-commodity Lighthill–Whitham–Richards model of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 361-377.
    16. Zhou, Fang & Li, Xiaopeng & Ma, Jiaqi, 2017. "Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory design of connected automated traffic part I: Theoretical analysis with generalized time geography," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 394-420.
    17. Storm, Pieter Jacob & Mandjes, Michel & van Arem, Bart, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of stochastic traffic flow models using Gaussian process approximation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 126-144.
    18. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Abdulhai, Baher, 2015. "Nonlinear multivariate time–space threshold vector error correction model for short term traffic state prediction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 27-47.
    19. Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Raadsen, Mark P.H., 2019. "Continuous-time general link transmission model with simplified fanning, Part I: Theory and link model formulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 442-470.
    20. Ke Han & Gabriel Eve & Terry L. Friesz, 2019. "Computing Dynamic User Equilibria on Large-Scale Networks with Software Implementation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 869-902, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:35:y:2001:i:2:p:183-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.