IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v31y1997i2p103-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simple physical principle for the simulation of freeways with special lanes and priority vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Daganzo, Carlos F.
  • Lin, Wei-Hua
  • Del Castillo, Jose M.

Abstract

This paper presents a simple physical principle that can be used to solve the kinematic wave problem for freeways with special lanes and priority vehicles. The principle is shown to yield the flows for all possible 'Riemann problems' arising in a homogeneous highway, so that its application in a simulation is equivalent to the Godunov 'classic' finite difference approximation method. The principle is appealing because its physical basis, unlike purely mathematical formulae, suggests a natural way in which boundary conditions for practical problems may be treated. Perhaps the IT principle will prove useful for solving general problems, e.g. involving multicommodity networks. This issue deserves more study. As an illustration of this potential the paper shows that an IT simulation of the finite highway problem solved in the companion paper (Daganzo, Transportation Research B, 31, 83-102, 1997) matches rather well the exact solution. Additional tests using other boundary conditions for the same problem also revealed a good match.

Suggested Citation

  • Daganzo, Carlos F. & Lin, Wei-Hua & Del Castillo, Jose M., 1997. "A simple physical principle for the simulation of freeways with special lanes and priority vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 103-125, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:31:y:1997:i:2:p:103-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(96)00032-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1997. "A continuum theory of traffic dynamics for freeways with special lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 83-102, April.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    3. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 261-276, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nair, Rahul & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2011. "A porous flow approach to modeling heterogeneous traffic in disordered systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1331-1345.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1999. "A Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow Part I: Long Homogeneous Freeway Sections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8n96n91w, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Rohde, Jannis, 2011. "Operational macroscopic modeling of complex urban road intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 903-922, July.
    4. Logghe, S. & Immers, L.H., 2008. "Multi-class kinematic wave theory of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 523-541, July.
    5. Laval, Jorge A. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2004. "Multi-Lane Hybrid Traffic Flow Model: Quantifying the Impacts of Lane-Changing Maneuvers on Traffic Flow," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8w70q261, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Jin, Wen-Long, 2013. "A multi-commodity Lighthill–Whitham–Richards model of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 361-377.
    7. Zheng, Zuduo, 2014. "Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-32.
    8. Robert, Tim & Lin, Wei-Hua & Cassidy, Michael, 1999. "Validation of the Incremental Transfer Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt48s3v44r, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Laval, Jorge A. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "Lane-changing in traffic streams," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 251-264, March.
    10. Newell, G. F., 1999. "Delays caused by a queue at a freeway exit ramp," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 337-350, June.
    11. Wen-Long Jin, 2015. "Analysis of Kinematic Waves Arising in Diverging Traffic Flow Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 28-45, February.
    12. Aghamohammadi, Rafegh & Laval, Jorge A., 2020. "A continuum model for cities based on the macroscopic fundamental diagram: A semi-Lagrangian solution method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 101-116.
    13. Laval, Jorge A., 2003. "Some Properties of a Multi-Lane Extension of the Kinematic Wave Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6hg2g0nq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "A stochastic dynamic network loading model for mixed traffic with autonomous and human-driven vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Horowitz, Roberto & May, Adolf & Skabardonis, Alex & Varaiya, Pravin & Zhang, Michael & Gomes, Gabriel & Munoz, Laura & Sun, Xiaotian & Sun, Dengfeng, 2005. "Design, Field Implementation and Evaluation of Adaptive Ramp Metering Algorithms," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5p06q6k5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2002. "The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 483-505, July.
    17. Munoz, Juan Carlos & Daganzo, Carlos, 2000. "Experimental Characterization of Multi-Lane Freeway Traffic Upstream of an Off-Ramp Bottleneck," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8635j1df, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    18. Juan Carlos Muñoz & Carlos F. Daganzo, 2003. "Structure of the Transition Zone Behind Freeway Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 312-329, August.
    19. Daganzo, C. F. & Cassidy, M. J. & Bertini, R. L., 1999. "Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 365-379, June.
    20. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2002. "A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part I: Long homogeneous freeway sections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 131-158, February.
    21. Helbing, Dirk & Hennecke, Ansgar & Shvetsov, Vladimir & Treiber, Martin, 2001. "MASTER: macroscopic traffic simulation based on a gas-kinetic, non-local traffic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 183-211, February.
    22. Zhou, Hao & Toth, Christopher & Guensler, Randall & Laval, Jorge, 2022. "Hybrid modeling of lane changes near freeway diverges," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Logghe, S. & Immers, L.H., 2008. "Multi-class kinematic wave theory of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 523-541, July.
    2. Mohammadian, Saeed & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Bhaskar, Ashish, 2021. "Performance of continuum models for realworld traffic flows: Comprehensive benchmarking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 132-167.
    3. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    5. Jin, Wen-Long, 2018. "Unifiable multi-commodity kinematic wave model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 639-659.
    6. Malachy Carey & Paul Humphreys & Marie McHugh & Ronan McIvor, 2018. "Consistency and Inconsistency Between the Fundamental Relationships on Which Different Traffic Assignment Models Are Based," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1548-1569, December.
    7. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    8. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Rohde, Jannis, 2011. "Operational macroscopic modeling of complex urban road intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 903-922, July.
    9. Jin, Wen-Long, 2012. "A kinematic wave theory of multi-commodity network traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1000-1022.
    10. Nicholas Molyneaux & Riccardo Scarinci & Michel Bierlaire, 0. "Design and analysis of control strategies for pedestrian flows," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-41.
    11. Carey, Malachy & Humphreys, Paul & McHugh, Marie & McIvor, Ronan, 2014. "Extending travel-time based models for dynamic network loading and assignment, to achieve adherence to first-in-first-out and link capacities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 90-104.
    12. Jabari, Saif Eddin & Liu, Henry X., 2013. "A stochastic model of traffic flow: Gaussian approximation and estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 15-41.
    13. Bar-Gera, Hillel & Carey, Malachy, 2022. "Constructing a cell transmission model solution adhering fully to first-in-first-out conditions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 247-267.
    14. Nicholas Molyneaux & Riccardo Scarinci & Michel Bierlaire, 2021. "Design and analysis of control strategies for pedestrian flows," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1767-1807, August.
    15. Carey, Malachy & Watling, David, 2012. "Dynamic traffic assignment approximating the kinematic wave model: System optimum, marginal costs, externalities and tolls," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 634-648.
    16. Carey, Malachy, 2021. "The cell transmission model with free-flow speeds varying over time or space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 245-257.
    17. Nair, Rahul & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2011. "A porous flow approach to modeling heterogeneous traffic in disordered systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1331-1345.
    18. Jin, Wen-Long, 2013. "A multi-commodity Lighthill–Whitham–Richards model of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 361-377.
    19. Carey, Malachy & Bar-Gera, Hillel & Watling, David & Balijepalli, Chandra, 2014. "Implementing first-in–first-out in the cell transmission model for networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 105-118.
    20. Wen-Long Jin, 2015. "Analysis of Kinematic Waves Arising in Diverging Traffic Flow Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 28-45, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:31:y:1997:i:2:p:103-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.