IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v150y2021icp386-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving a real-world Locomotive Scheduling Problem with Maintenance Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Frisch, Sarah
  • Hungerländer, Philipp
  • Jellen, Anna
  • Primas, Bernhard
  • Steininger, Sebastian
  • Weinberger, Dominic

Abstract

This work addresses the Locomotive Scheduling Problem with Maintenance Constraints (LSPM). The basic Locomotive Scheduling Problem (LSP), which depicts one of the most crucial optimization problems occurring in the railway industry, aims at assigning a fleet of locomotives to a set of scheduled trains such that the overall costs are minimized. As the rolling stock represents one of the main costs of a rail company, the focus lies on maximizing the utilization of the locomotives. This requires the incorporation of special maintenance constraints that increase the computational difficulty of the problem significantly. In our previous work, we proposed a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming formulation for solving the LSPM and continue in this paper by investigating different heuristic solution approaches, i.e., an Overlapping Rolling Horizon Approach and a Two-Stage Matheuristic (2SMH). In the objective function, realistic costs for deadheading, the number of used locomotives and maintenance jobs are taken into account. An extensive computational study is conducted on instances with up to 2,290 trains derived from real-world data provided by RCA, the largest Austrian rail company for freight transportation. All solution approaches are analyzed in detail and compared against each other in order to show their benefits and disadvantages. We show that our approaches are capable of delivering high-quality solutions within short computation times. In fact, the performance of the 2SMH qualifies it to form the basis of a large scale real-time application to support railroad managers in their daily operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Frisch, Sarah & Hungerländer, Philipp & Jellen, Anna & Primas, Bernhard & Steininger, Sebastian & Weinberger, Dominic, 2021. "Solving a real-world Locomotive Scheduling Problem with Maintenance Constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 386-409.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:150:y:2021:i:c:p:386-409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.06.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261521001284
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2021.06.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cordeau, Jean-François & Desaulniers, Guy & Lingaya, Norbert & Soumis, François & Desrosiers, Jacques, 2001. "Simultaneous locomotive and car assignment at VIA Rail Canada," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 767-787, September.
    2. Balachandran Vaidyanathan & Ravindra K. Ahuja & James B. Orlin, 2008. "The Locomotive Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 492-507, November.
    3. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    4. Nielsen, Lars Kjær & Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor, 2012. "A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 496-509.
    5. Scheffler, Martin & Neufeld, Janis S. & Hölscher, Michael, 2020. "An MIP-based heuristic solution approach for the locomotive assignment problem focussing on (dis-)connecting processes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 64-80.
    6. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Jian Liu & James B. Orlin & Dushyant Sharma & Larry A. Shughart, 2005. "Solving Real-Life Locomotive-Scheduling Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 503-517, November.
    7. Sarah Frisch & Philipp Hungerländer & Anna Jellen & Dominic Weinberger, 2019. "A Mixed Integer Linear Program for Optimizing the Utilization of Locomotives with Maintenance Constraints," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Bernard Fortz & Martine Labbé (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2018, pages 103-109, Springer.
    8. Jean-François Cordeau & François Soumis & Jacques Desrosiers, 2000. "A Benders Decomposition Approach for the Locomotive and Car Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 133-149, May.
    9. Ralf Borndörfer & Markus Reuther & Thomas Schlechte & Kerstin Waas & Steffen Weider, 2016. "Integrated Optimization of Rolling Stock Rotations for Intercity Railways," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 863-877, August.
    10. Jean-François Cordeau & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo, 1998. "A Survey of Optimization Models for Train Routing and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 380-404, November.
    11. Fioole, Pieter-Jan & Kroon, Leo & Maroti, Gabor & Schrijver, Alexander, 2006. "A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1281-1297, October.
    12. Suresh Chand & Vernon Ning Hsu & Suresh Sethi, 2002. "Forecast, Solution, and Rolling Horizons in Operations Management Problems: A Classified Bibliography," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 25-43, September.
    13. Valentina Cacchiani & Alberto Caprara & Paolo Toth, 2019. "An Effective Peak Period Heuristic for Railway Rolling Stock Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 746-762, May.
    14. Haahr, Jørgen T. & Wagenaar, Joris C. & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Kroon, Leo G., 2016. "A comparison of two exact methods for passenger railway rolling stock (re)scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 15-32.
    15. Jean-François Cordeau & François Soumis & Jacques Desrosiers, 2001. "Simultaneous Assignment of Locomotives and Cars to Passenger Trains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 531-548, August.
    16. V. B. Gleaves, 1957. "Cyclic scheduling and combinatorial topology: Assignment and routing of motive power to meet scheduling and maintenance requirements Part I ‐ A statement of the operating problem of the Frisco railroa," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 203-205, September.
    17. Vaidyanathan, Balachandran & Ahuja, Ravindra K. & Liu, Jian & Shughart, Larry A., 2008. "Real-life locomotive planning: New formulations and computational results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 147-168, February.
    18. Gábor Maróti & Leo Kroon, 2005. "Maintenance Routing for Train Units: The Transition Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 518-525, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Boliang & Shen, Yaoming & Wang, Zhongkai & Ni, Shaoquan & Zhao, Yinan, 2023. "An iterative improvement approach for high-speed train maintenance scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 292-312.
    2. Roy, Debjit & van Ommeren, Jan-Kees & de Koster, René & Gharehgozli, Amir, 2022. "Modeling landside container terminal queues: Exact analysis and approximations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 73-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilo Ortiz-Astorquiza & Jean-François Cordeau & Emma Frejinger, 2021. "The Locomotive Assignment Problem with Distributed Power at the Canadian National Railway Company," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 510-531, March.
    2. Gao, Yuan & Xia, Jun & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yang, Lixing, 2022. "Weekly rolling stock planning in Chinese high-speed rail networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 295-322.
    3. Zhong, Qingwei & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan, 2019. "Rolling stock scheduling with maintenance requirements at the Chinese High-Speed Railway," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 24-44.
    4. Gao, Yuan & Schmidt, Marie & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2020. "A branch-and-price approach for trip sequence planning of high-speed train units," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2019. "Literature Review of Locomotive Assignment Problem from Service Operations Perspective: The Case of Indian Railways," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 74-86, January.
    6. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2018. "Integrated train timetabling and locomotive assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 573-593.
    7. Canca, David & Barrena, Eva, 2018. "The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 115-138.
    8. Lusby, Richard M. & Haahr, Jørgen Thorlund & Larsen, Jesper & Pisinger, David, 2017. "A Branch-and-Price algorithm for railway rolling stock rescheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 228-250.
    9. Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari & Clark Cheng & Sourav Das & Ricardo Fiorillo & Warren B. Powell, 2016. "From Single Commodity to Multiattribute Models for Locomotive Optimization: A Comparison of Optimal Integer Programming and Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 366-389, May.
    10. Haahr, J.T. & Wagenaar, J.C. & Veelenturf, L.P. & Kroon, L.G., 2015. "A Comparison of Two Exact Methods for Passenger Railway Rolling Stock (Re)Scheduling," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2015-007-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Scheffler, Martin & Neufeld, Janis S. & Hölscher, Michael, 2020. "An MIP-based heuristic solution approach for the locomotive assignment problem focussing on (dis-)connecting processes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 64-80.
    12. Joris C. Wagenaar & Leo G. Kroon & Marie Schmidt, 2017. "Maintenance Appointments in Railway Rolling Stock Rescheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1138-1160, November.
    13. Haahr, Jørgen T. & Wagenaar, Joris C. & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Kroon, Leo G., 2016. "A comparison of two exact methods for passenger railway rolling stock (re)scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 15-32.
    14. Warren B. Powell & Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari & Coleman Lawrence & Clark Cheng & Sourav Das & Ricardo Fiorillo, 2014. "Locomotive Planning at Norfolk Southern: An Optimizing Simulator Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 567-578, December.
    15. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    17. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2022. "Locomotive assignment problem: integrating the strategic, tactical and operational level aspects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 867-898, August.
    18. Nourbakhsh, Seyed Mohammad & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2010. "Optimal fueling strategies for locomotive fleets in railroad networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1104-1114, September.
    19. Wang, Entai & Yang, Lixing & Yin, Jiateng & Zhang, Jinlei & Gao, Ziyou, 2024. "Passenger-oriented rolling stock scheduling in the metro system with multiple depots: Network flow based approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Wagenaar, J.C. & Kroon, L.G. & Schmidt, M.E., 2016. "Maintenance Appointments in Railway Rolling Stock Rescheduling," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2016-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:150:y:2021:i:c:p:386-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.