IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v182y2024ics0965856424000673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohri, Seyed Sina
  • Nassir, Neema
  • Thompson, Russell G.
  • Lavieri, Patricia Sauri

Abstract

An emerging stream of Crowd-Shipping (CS) solutions focuses on existing momentum in Public Transportation (PT) to ship viable delivery packages by PT passengers. Few studies have explored the package delivery acceptance behavior of passengers engaged in PT-based CS initiatives while passengers’ behavioral intention to participate (i.e., engage) is not studied. It is requisite that newly introduced CS platforms explore their potential crowdshippers’ behavior on intention to participate and set efficient marketing strategies. Given survey data collected from 2208 PT passengers in Sydney metropolitan area, this study explores the intention of PT passengers as crowd-shippers to participate in PT-based CS initiatives, as well as prohibiting factors in way of participation. Accordingly, a binominal logit model is developed whereby the variables impacting the intention to participate are identified. Then, using an inductive thematic analysis, 917 reasons (text responses) for not participating are scrutinized, and the prohibiting factors are identified and categorized. Considering demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the respondents, the study reveals to what degree passengers with different characteristics are sensitive to prohibiting factors. This research provides several practical insights that can assist in successfully defining, launching, and advertising a new PT-based CS initiative. As a key finding, it is observed that women, full-time employees, elderly, retirees, and low-income PT passengers hardly participate, while the youth, individuals with a positive attitude towards sustainable freight initiatives, and those who experienced working with parcel lockers would participate with a higher probability. Moreover, it is observed that factors relating to time availability/flexibility and physical health condition/importance of passengers are much more important than the compensation level for passengers to accept to participate in PT-based CS initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424000673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424000673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2023. "Flexible-route integrated passenger–freight transport in rural areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Michele D. Simoni & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Christian G. Claudel, 2020. "Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: a simulation-based evaluation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1933-1954, August.
    3. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.
    4. ., 2022. "The decline of regional merchant networks," Chapters, in: Elusive Capital, chapter 9, pages 231-241, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, September.
    6. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    8. Emerson A. Baptista & Bernardo L. Queiroz & Everton E. C. Lima, 2022. "Regional COVID-19 mortality in Brazil by age," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 20(1), pages 349-365.
    9. Baris Yildiz & Martin Savelsbergh, 2019. "Provably High-Quality Solutions for the Meal Delivery Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1372-1388, September.
    10. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Fessler, Andreas & Thorhauge, Mikkel & Mabit, Stefan & Haustein, Sonja, 2022. "A public transport-based crowdshipping concept as a sustainable last-mile solution: Assessing user preferences with a stated choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 210-223.
    12. Machado, Bruno & Pimentel, Carina & Sousa, Amaro de, 2023. "Integration planning of freight deliveries into passenger bus networks: Exact and heuristic algorithms," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Jianakoplos, Nancy Ammon & Bernasek, Alexandra, 1998. "Are Women More Risk Averse?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(4), pages 620-630, October.
    14. Lindholm, Maria & Behrends, Sönke, 2012. "Challenges in urban freight transport planning – a review in the Baltic Sea Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 129-136.
    15. Mario Binetti & Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Michele Ottomanelli, 2019. "A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    16. ., 2022. "Regional merchant networks," Chapters, in: Elusive Capital, chapter 3, pages 37-67, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Hatzenbühler, Jonas & Jenelius, Erik & Gidófalvi, Gyözö & Cats, Oded, 2023. "Modular vehicle routing for combined passenger and freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Archetti, Claudia & Savelsbergh, Martin & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2016. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 472-480.
    19. Evelyne Tina Kassai & Muhammad Azmat & Sebastian Kummer, 2020. "Scope of Using Autonomous Trucks and Lorries for Parcel Deliveries in Urban Settings," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Xiao Lin & Yoshinari Nishiki & Lóránt A. Tavasszy, 2020. "Performance and Intrusiveness of Crowdshipping Systems: An Experiment with Commuting Cyclists in The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, September.
    21. Vakulenko, Yulia & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2018. "What's in the parcel locker? Exploring customer value in e-commerce last mile delivery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 421-427.
    22. Daniels, Rhonda & Mulley, Corinne, 2013. "Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(2), pages 5-20.
    23. Allahviranloo, Mahdieh & Baghestani, Amirhossein, 2019. "A dynamic crowdshipping model and daily travel behavior," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-190.
    24. Beck, Matthew J. & Hensher, David A., 2022. "Working from home in Australia in 2020: Positives, negatives and the potential for future benefits to transport and society," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 271-284.
    25. Kafle, Nabin & Zou, Bo & Lin, Jane, 2017. "Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 62-82.
    26. Zhu, Shengda & Bell, Michael G.H. & Schulz, Veronica & Stokoe, Michael, 2023. "Co-modality in city logistics: Sounds good, but how?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    2. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2022. "Bundle generation for last-mile delivery with occasional drivers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Lin Zhou & Yanping Chen & Yi Jing & Youwei Jiang, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Last Mile Delivery Resource Integration—Exploring the Behavioral Strategies between Logistics Service Providers, Property Service Companies and Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Marisdea Castiglione & Antonio Comi & Rosita De Vincentis & Andreea Dumitru & Marialisa Nigro, 2022. "Delivering in Urban Areas: A Probabilistic-Behavioral Approach for Forecasting the Use of Electric Micromobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Ghaderi, Hadi & Zhang, Lele & Tsai, Pei-Wei & Woo, Jihoon, 2022. "Crowdsourced last-mile delivery with parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Martin W.P Savelsbergh & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in crowdsourced delivery planning and operations," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Ringsberg, Henrik, 2023. "Sustainable FLM transport based on IPF transport by ferry in coastal rural areas: A case from Sweden," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Ermagun, Alireza & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2018. "To bid or not to bid: An empirical study of the supply determinants of crowd-shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 468-483.
    12. Yuwei Yan & Xiaomeng Ma & Yi Song & Ajay Kumar & Ruixian Yang, 2023. "Exploring the interaction and choice behavior of organization and individuals in the crowd logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 1021-1040, January.
    13. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    14. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    15. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Ausseil, Rosemonde & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2024. "Online acceptance probability approximation in peer-to-peer transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2022. "A Strategic Approach for Promoting Sustainable Crowdshipping in Last-Mile Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    19. Marlin Ulmer & Martin Savelsbergh, 2020. "Workforce Scheduling in the Era of Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1113-1133, July.
    20. Yang, Xuan & Kong, Xiang T.R. & Huang, George Q., 2024. "Synchronizing crowdsourced co-modality between passenger and freight transportation services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424000673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.