IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v160y2022icp61-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A structural analysis of the work tour behavior of transit commuters

Author

Listed:
  • Rafiq, Rezwana
  • McNally, Michael G.

Abstract

Our knowledge of complex travel behavior associated with transit commuting is limited. While chaining activities into tours has been a frequent behavior of travelers in general, and in some cases of work commuters, it is unclear how successful public transit has been in providing the accessibility that is needed to link multiple activities, especially on work tours. To address this knowledge gap, a structural model was developed for transit commuters, which allows for the characterization of commuters based on the complexity of work tours and an assessment of the influence of household and person-level socio-demographic characteristics, built environment variables, and activity-travel demand on tour complexity. Using data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, this study’s results suggested that married men with no children and high vehicle ownership living in low-density areas tend to make simple work tours while single women with children who live in high-density neighborhoods were more likely to make complex work tours. Also, white men with higher incomes and higher education living in denser areas were more likely to make complex tours with work-based sub-tours. Denser residential neighborhoods, flexible work schedules, and vehicle availability on work tours were observed to increase the propensity of making complex tours. The findings of this study can assist transit agencies or planning organizations in identifying transit commuters who have complex travel needs or whose circumstances hold potential to yield greater benefits from transit usage in work tours and thus to formulate policies directed at better work and non-work travel and activity linkages.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafiq, Rezwana & McNally, Michael G., 2022. "A structural analysis of the work tour behavior of transit commuters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 61-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:160:y:2022:i:c:p:61-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642200091X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Currie, Graham & Delbosc, Alexa, 2011. "Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 204-210, January.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & McNally, Michael G., 1997. "A Model of Activity Participation Between Household Heads," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4dj8f1gg, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Chinh Ho & Corinne Mulley, 2013. "Tour-based mode choice of joint household travel patterns on weekend and weekday," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 789-811, July.
    5. Robert B Noland & John V Thomas, 2007. "Multivariate Analysis of Trip-Chaining Behavior," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(6), pages 953-970, December.
    6. Arun Kuppam & Ram Pendyala, 2001. "A structural equations analysis of commuters' activity and travel patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 33-54, February.
    7. Rezwana Rafiq & Michael G. McNally, 2021. "A study of tour formation: pre-, during, and post-recession analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2187-2233, October.
    8. Chieh-Hua Wen & Frank Koppelman, 2000. "A conceptual and methdological framework for the generation of activity-travel patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 5-23, February.
    9. David Hensher & April Reyes, 2000. "Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 341-361, December.
    10. David Levinson & Ajay Kumar, 1995. "Activity, Travel, and the Allocation of Time," Working Papers 199505, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    11. Bhat, Chandra R. & Singh, Sujit K., 2000. "A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for workers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Ho, Chinh Q. & Mulley, Corinne, 2013. "Multiple purposes at single destination: A key to a better understanding of the relationship between tour complexity and mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 206-219.
    13. Md Hadiuzzaman & Nahid Parvez Farazi & Sanjana Hossain & Saurav Barua & Farzana Rahman, 2019. "Structural equation approach to investigate trip-chaining and mode choice relationships in the context of developing countries," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 391-415, May.
    14. Bhat, Chandra, 1999. "An analysis of evening commute stop-making behavior using repeated choice observations from a multi-day survey," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 495-510, September.
    15. Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 1991. "Recursive Model System for Trip Generation and Trip Chaining," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1r0726j3, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Krygsman, Stephan & Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2007. "Capturing tour mode and activity choice interdependencies: A co-evolutionary logit modelling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 913-933, December.
    17. Golob, Thomas F., 2000. "A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 355-376, June.
    18. Van Acker, Veronique & Witlox, Frank, 2010. "Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 65-74.
    19. Lu, Xuedong & Pas, Eric I., 1999. "Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Wang, Rui, 2015. "The stops made by commuters: evidence from the 2009 US National Household Travel Survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 109-118.
    21. Veronique Acker & Frank Witlox, 2011. "Commuting trips within tours: how is commuting related to land use?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 465-486, May.
    22. Alan C. Acock, 2013. "Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number dsemus, March.
    23. Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 1991. "Recursive Model System for Trip Generation and Trip Chaining," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6vn683d3, University of California Transportation Center.
    24. Golob, Thomas F. & McNally, Michael G., 1997. "A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 177-194, June.
    25. Susilo, Yusak O. & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 2008. "Structural changes in commuters' daily travel: The case of auto and transit commuters in the Osaka metropolitan area of Japan, 1980-2000," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 95-115, January.
    26. Rafiq, Rezwana & McNally, Michael G., 2020. "An empirical analysis and policy implications of work tours utilizing public transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 237-259.
    27. Fujii, Satoshi & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 2000. "Evaluation of trip-inducing effects of new freeways using a structural equations model system of commuters' time use and travel," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 339-354, June.
    28. Xinyu Cao & Patricia L Mokhtarian & Susan L Handy, 2008. "Differentiating the Influence of Accessibility, Attitudes, and Demographics on Stop Participation and Frequency during the Evening Commute," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(3), pages 431-442, June.
    29. Ye, Xin & Pendyala, Ram M. & Gottardi, Giovanni, 2007. "An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 96-113, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Zhang & Li Zhang & Yanjun Liu & Lele Zhang, 2023. "Understanding Travel Mode Choice Behavior: Influencing Factors Analysis and Prediction with Machine Learning Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Song Li & Fei Xue & Chuyu Xia & Jian Zhang & Ao Bian & Yuexi Lang & Jun Zhou, 2022. "A Big Data-Based Commuting Carbon Emissions Accounting Method—A Case of Hangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Rui, 2015. "The stops made by commuters: evidence from the 2009 US National Household Travel Survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 109-118.
    2. Bautista-Hernández, Dorian Antonio, 2022. "Individual, household, and urban form determinants of trip chaining of non-work travel in México City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Rafiq, Rezwana & McNally, Michael G., 2020. "An empirical analysis and policy implications of work tours utilizing public transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 237-259.
    4. Zidan Mao & Dick Ettema & Martin Dijst, 2018. "Analysis of travel time and mode choice shift for non-work stops in commuting: case study of Beijing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 751-766, May.
    5. Rezwana Rafiq & Michael G. McNally, 2021. "A study of tour formation: pre-, during, and post-recession analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2187-2233, October.
    6. Tufayel Chowdhury & Darren M. Scott, 2020. "Role of the built environment on trip-chaining behavior: an investigation of workers and non-workers in Halifax, Nova Scotia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 737-761, April.
    7. João De Abreu e Silva, 2018. "The Effects of Land-Use Patterns on Home-Based Tour Complexity and Total Distances Traveled: A Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Lee, Yuhwa & Hickman, Mark & Washington, Simon, 2007. "Household type and structure, time-use pattern, and trip-chaining behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1004-1020, December.
    9. François Sprumont & Ariane Scheffer & Geoffrey Caruso & Eric Cornelis & Francesco Viti, 2022. "Quantifying the Relation between Activity Pattern Complexity and Car Use Using a Partial Least Square Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2016. "Empirical analysis and comparisons about time-allocation patterns across segments based on mode-specific preferences," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 37-51, January.
    11. Liya Yang & Lingqian Hu & Zhenbo Wang, 2019. "The built environment and trip chaining behaviour revisited: The joint effects of the modifiable areal unit problem and tour purpose," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 795-817, March.
    12. Steven R. Gehrke & Timothy F. Welch, 2017. "The built environment determinants of activity participation and walking near the workplace," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 941-956, September.
    13. Xin Guan & Xin Ye & Cheng Shi & Yajie Zou, 2019. "A Multivariate Modeling Analysis of Commuters’ Non-Work Activity Allocations in Xiaoshan District of Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2016. "Empirical analysis and comparisons about time-allocation patterns across segments based on mode-specific preferences," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 37-51, January.
    15. Naznin Sultana Daisy & Lei Liu & Hugh Millward, 2020. "Trip chaining propensity and tour mode choice of out-of-home workers: evidence from a mid-sized Canadian city," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 763-792, April.
    16. Jonas De Vos & Long Cheng & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Do changes in the residential location lead to changes in travel attitudes? A structural equation modeling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2011-2034, August.
    17. Iragaël Joly & Karl Littlejohn & Vincent Kaufmann, 2006. "La croissance des budgets-temps de transport en question : nouvelles approches," Post-Print halshs-00174992, HAL.
    18. Huang, Yuqiao & Gao, Linjie & Ni, Anning & Liu, Xiaoning, 2021. "Analysis of travel mode choice and trip chain pattern relationships based on multi-day GPS data: A case study in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Ge Gao & Huijun Sun & Jianjun Wu, 2019. "Activity-based trip chaining behavior analysis in the network under the parking fee scheme," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 647-669, June.
    20. Ho, Chinh Q. & Mulley, Corinne, 2013. "Multiple purposes at single destination: A key to a better understanding of the relationship between tour complexity and mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 206-219.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:160:y:2022:i:c:p:61-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.