IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v163y2021ics0040162520312786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunity-driven technology roadmapping: The case of 5G mobile services

Author

Listed:
  • Noh, Heeyong
  • Kim, Kyuwoong
  • Song, Young-Keun
  • Lee, Sungjoo

Abstract

Given the increasing significance of technology-push strategy and market-driven strategy, an integrated approach to technology roadmapping that considers both strategies in a systemic way is needed. To satisfy such need, this study suggests a novel roadmapping approach, named opportunity-driven roadmapping. It integrates the identification of technological opportunities in a retrospective manner and the proposition of future values in a prospective manner. During roadmapping, three canvases (value proposition canvas, technology solution canvas, and roadmap canvas) are used and three analyses (scenario analysis, patent analysis, and relationship analysis) are employed to support decision-makings for each canvas. Since mobile services industry has numerous business opportunities due to the emergence of 5 G telecommunications technologies, the suggested approach is applied to mobile services industry to verify its usability.

Suggested Citation

  • Noh, Heeyong & Kim, Kyuwoong & Song, Young-Keun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2021. "Opportunity-driven technology roadmapping: The case of 5G mobile services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:163:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520312786
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520312786
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongho Lee & So Young Kim & Inseok Song & Yongtae Park & Juneseuk Shin, 2014. "Technology opportunity identification customized to the technological capability of SMEs through two-stage patent analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(1), pages 227-244, July.
    2. Alizadeh, Reza & Lund, Peter D. & Beynaghi, Ali & Abolghasemi, Mahdi & Maknoon, Reza, 2016. "An integrated scenario-based robust planning approach for foresight and strategic management with application to energy industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 162-171.
    3. Fabry, Bernd & Ernst, Holger & Langholz, Jens & Köster, Martin, 2006. "Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities--an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 215-225, September.
    4. Lin, Bou-Wen & Lee, Yikuan & Hung, Shih-Chang, 2006. "R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 679-685, June.
    5. Clive Kerr & Robert Phaal & David Probert, 2012. "Addressing The Cognitive And Social Influence Inhibitors During The Ideation Stages Of Technology Roadmapping Workshops," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(06), pages 1-20.
    6. Neil A. Morgan & Douglas W. Vorhies & Charlotte H. Mason, 2009. "Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 909-920, August.
    7. Noh, Heeyong & Song, Young-Keun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2016. "Identifying emerging core technologies for the future: Case study of patents published by leading telecommunication organizations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 956-970.
    8. Hao, Shengbin & Song, Michael, 2016. "Technology-driven strategy and firm performance: Are strategic capabilities missing links?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 751-759.
    9. Lu, Hsi-Peng & Weng, Chien-I, 2018. "Smart manufacturing technology, market maturity analysis and technology roadmap in the computer and electronic product manufacturing industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-94.
    10. Patel, Pari & Vega, Modesto, 1999. "Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 145-155, March.
    11. Geum, Youngjung & Lee, HyeonJeong & Lee, Youngjo & Park, Yongtae, 2015. "Development of data-driven technology roadmap considering dependency: An ARM-based technology roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 264-279.
    12. Philippe Durance & Michel Godet, 2010. "Scenario building: Uses and abuses," Post-Print hal-02864615, HAL.
    13. Zhang, Xian & Fan, Jing-Li & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2013. "Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 536-550.
    14. N. Gerdsri, 2007. "An Analytical Approach To Building A Technology Development Envelope (Tde) For Roadmapping Of Emerging Technologies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02), pages 121-135.
    15. Boso, Nathaniel & Story, Vicky M. & Cadogan, John W., 2013. "Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 708-727.
    16. Toro-Jarrín, Miguel Angel & Ponce-Jaramillo, Idalia Estefania & Güemes-Castorena, David, 2016. "Methodology for the of building process integration of Business Model Canvas and Technological Roadmap," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 213-225.
    17. Lee, Hakyeon & Geum, Youngjung, 2017. "Development of the scenario-based technology roadmap considering layer heterogeneity: An approach using CIA and AHP," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 12-24.
    18. Heeyong Noh & Youngkeun Song & Ae-Soon Park & Byungun Yoon & Sungjoo Lee, 2016. "Development of new technology-based services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 200-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jinfeng & Zhang, Zhixin & Feng, Lijie & Lin, Kuo-Yi & Liu, Peng, 2023. "Development of technology opportunity analysis based on technology landscape by extending technology elements with BERT and TRIZ," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Yuskevich, Ilya & Hein, Andreas Makoto & Amokrane-Ferka, Kahina & Doufene, Abdelkrim & Jankovic, Marija, 2021. "A metamodel of an informational structure for model-based technology roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Alcantara, Douglas Pedro & Martens, Mauro Luiz, 2019. "Technology Roadmapping (TRM): a systematic review of the literature focusing on models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 127-138.
    2. Daim, Tugrul U. & Yoon, Byung-Sung & Lindenberg, John & Grizzi, Robert & Estep, Judith & Oliver, Terry, 2018. "Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 49-66.
    3. Nazarenko, Anastasia & Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Meissner, Dirk & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Applying digital technologies in technology roadmapping to overcome individual biased assessments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Zhang, Hao & Daim, Tugrul & Zhang, Yunqiu (Peggy), 2021. "Integrating patent analysis into technology roadmapping: A latent dirichlet allocation based technology assessment and roadmapping in the field of Blockchain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Yujin Jeong & Hyejin Jang & Byungun Yoon, 2021. "Developing a risk-adaptive technology roadmap using a Bayesian network and topic modeling under deep uncertainty," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3697-3722, May.
    6. Park, Hyunkyu & Phaal, Rob & Ho, Jae-Yun & O'Sullivan, Eoin, 2020. "Twenty years of technology and strategic roadmapping research: A school of thought perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Crick, James M. & Crick, Dave, 2021. "The dark-side of coopetition: Influences on the paradoxical forces of cooperativeness and competitiveness across product-market strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 226-240.
    8. Ren, Haiying & Zhao, Yuhui, 2021. "Technology opportunity discovery based on constructing, evaluating, and searching knowledge networks," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Mohammad Falahat & Yan-Yin Lee & Pedro Soto-Acosta & T. Ramayah, 2021. "Entrepreneurial, market, learning and networking orientations as determinants of business capability and international performance: the contingent role of government support," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1759-1780, December.
    10. Liu, Yang, 2019. "The Processes of New Product Development Recentralization towards a Transnational Emphasis in Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 19-36.
    11. Gianluca Vagnani & Michele Simoni, 2016. "Technological uncertainty, market orientation and firms? economic performance," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 143-167.
    12. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2020. "International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    13. Alipour, M. & Hafezi, R. & Amer, M. & Akhavan, A.N., 2017. "A new hybrid fuzzy cognitive map-based scenario planning approach for Iran's oil production pathways in the post–sanction period," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 851-864.
    14. Xiaolin Li & Changyu Wang, 2022. "Entrepreneurial bricolage and marketing capability: contingent roles of market turbulence and strategic flexibility," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 458-481, July.
    15. Yinghong Susan Wei & Hugh O’Neill & Nan Zhou, 2020. "How Does Perceived Integrity in Leadership Matter to Firms in a Transitional Economy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 623-641, December.
    16. Samppa Suoniemi & Lars Meyer-Waarden & Andreas Munzel & Alex Ricardo Zablah & Detmar Straub, 2020. "Big data and firm performance: The roles of market-directed capabilities and business strategy," Post-Print hal-02957479, HAL.
    17. Panula-Ontto, J. & Piirainen, K.A., 2018. "EXIT: An alternative approach for structural cross-impact modeling and analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-100.
    18. Pantano, Eleonora & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2018. "Knowledge Push Curve (KPC) in retailing: Evidence from patented innovations analysis affecting retailers' competitiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 150-160.
    19. Sang Ho Kook & Ki Hong Kim & Chulung Lee, 2017. "Dynamic Technological Diversification and Its Impact on Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Korean IT Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Hao, Shengbin & Song, Michael, 2016. "Technology-driven strategy and firm performance: Are strategic capabilities missing links?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 751-759.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:163:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520312786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.