IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v161y2020ics0040162520311586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0 technologies, digital trust and technological orientation: What matters in open innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Mubarak, Muhammad Faraz
  • Petraite, Monika

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution, termed Industry 4.0, offers a vital and valuable opportunity to drive social and technological innovations. It has state-of-the-art cyber-physical systems and related technological architecture, which can drastically increase a firm's productivity and innovation performance. Nevertheless, Industry 4.0 is also significantly shortening the product life cycles and demanding the pace of innovation to be accelerated. A firm, however, cannot accelerate the pace of its innovation by exclusively relying only on its internal resources. This is the reason firms are increasingly adopting open innovation strategy through collaboration with external stakeholders. The critical challenge that firms are facing while managing open innovation is trust among the stakeholders. Digital trust, attained through Industry 4.0 technologies, can play an instrumental role in promoting open innovation. Against this backdrop, the present study investigates the impact of digital trust on open innovation performance. The study investigates the role of technological orientation and technological absorption capacity in the association between digital trust and open innovation. Cross-country data of 324 electrical and electronics firms of three major Asia-Pacific countries, namely Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand, were collected using a close-ended questionnaire. The study employed partial least square-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and PLS-multi group analysis (PLS-MGA) to analyze the modeled relationships. The results reveal that digital trust, composed of trust and Industry 4.0 technologies, has a significant positive impact on a firm's open innovation. Likewise, results also depict a strongly positive moderating role of technological orientation in the association between digital trust and open innovation. Finally, results also exhibit a significant mediating role of both potential and realized technological absorptive capacities in the association of digital trust and open innovation. It is the first-ever study discussing the linkage of digital trust with open innovation. The findings of this study suggest development of technology strategy to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies for accelerating the pace of open innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mubarak, Muhammad Faraz & Petraite, Monika, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies, digital trust and technological orientation: What matters in open innovation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:161:y:2020:i:c:s0040162520311586
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520311586
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey E. McGee & Michael J. Dowling & William L. Megginson, 1995. "Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of business strategy and management experience," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 565-580.
    2. Flatten, Tessa C. & Engelen, Andreas & Zahra, Shaker A. & Brettel, Malte, 2011. "A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 98-116, April.
    3. Saeed Mujahid & Shujaat Mubarik & Navaz Naghavi, 2019. "Prioritizing dimensions of entrepreneurial ecosystem: a proposed framework," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Miia Kosonen & Chunmei Gan & Mika Vanhala & Kirsimarja Blomqvist, 2014. "User Motivation And Knowledge Sharing In Idea Crowdsourcing," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1-23.
    5. Mina, Andrea & Bascavusoglu-Moreau, Elif & Hughes, Alan, 2014. "Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 853-866.
    6. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M., 2010. "How open is innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 699-709, July.
    7. Enkel, Ellen & Heil, Sebastian & Hengstler, Monika & Wirth, Henning, 2017. "Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 60, pages 29-38.
    8. Yanling Chang & Eleftherios Iakovou & Weidong Shi, 2020. "Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 2082-2099, April.
    9. Kostopoulos, Konstantinos & Papalexandris, Alexandros & Papachroni, Margarita & Ioannou, George, 2011. "Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1335-1343.
    10. von Zedtwitz, Maximilian & Gassmann, Oliver, 2002. "Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 569-588, May.
    11. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    12. Oliveira, Pedro & von Hippel, Eric, 2011. "Users as service innovators: The case of banking services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 806-818, July.
    13. Shijun Cheng & John Evans & Nandu Nagarajan, 2008. "Board size and firm performance: the moderating effects of the market for corporate control," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 121-145, August.
    14. Dimitrios Salampasis & Anne-Laure Mention & Marko Torkkeli, 2014. "Open innovation and collaboration in the financial services sector: exploring the role of trust," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5), pages 466-484.
    15. Frank, Alejandro G. & Mendes, Glauco H.S. & Ayala, Néstor F. & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2019. "Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 341-351.
    16. Sung, Tae Kyung, 2018. "Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 40-45.
    17. Shaker A. Zahra & James C. Hayton & Donald O. Neubaum & Clay Dibrell & Justin Craig, 2008. "Culture of Family Commitment and Strategic Flexibility: The Moderating Effect of Stewardship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(6), pages 1035-1054, November.
    18. Bhattacharjee, Sudip & Gopal, Ram D & Lertwachara, Kaveepan & Marsden, James R, 2006. "Impact of Legal Threats on Online Music Sharing Activity: An Analysis of Music Industry Legal Actions," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(1), pages 91-114, April.
    19. Muhammad Imran & Waseem ul Hameed & Adnan ul Haque, 2018. "Influence of Industry 4.0 on the Production and Service Sectors in Pakistan: Evidence from Textile and Logistics Industries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Tim Schweisfurth & Christina Raasch & Cornelius Herstatt, 2011. "Free revealing in open innovation: a comparison of different models and their benefits for companies," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 95-118.
    21. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Jones, Stephen L. & Fawcett, Amydee M., 2012. "Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-178.
    22. Dimitrios G. Salampasis & Anne-Laure Mention & Marko Torkkeli, 2015. "Trust embeddedness within an open innovation mindset," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 32-57.
    23. Martin Trapp, 2014. "Realizing Business Model Innovation," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-658-05094-8, October.
    24. Le, Duc Nha & Le Tuan, Loc & Dang Tuan, Minh Nguyen, 2019. "Smart-building management system: An Internet-of-Things (IoT) application business model in Vietnam," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 22-35.
    25. Parkhe, Arvind, 1998. "Understanding trust in international alliances," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 219-240, October.
    26. Lenny Koh & Alexandre Dolgui & Joseph Sarkis, 2020. "Blockchain in transport and logistics – paradigms and transitions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 2054-2062, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahra, Shaker A. & Liu, Wan & Si, Steven, 2023. "How digital technology promotes entrepreneurship in ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Ferraro, Giovanna & Ponsiglione, Cristina & Primario, Simonetta & Quinto, Ivana, 2023. "Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Dixit, Aasheesh & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Kumar, Patanjal, 2022. "Does lean and sustainable manufacturing lead to Industry 4.0 adoption: The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Li, Lixu & Zhu, Wenwen & Wei, Long & Yang, Shuili, 2022. "How can digital collaboration capability boost service innovation? Evidence from the information technology industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Obradović, Tena & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Liu, Hua & Ma, Ruili & He, Guangyao & Lamrabet, Abdesslam & Fu, Shaoling, 2023. "The impact of blockchain technology on the online purchase behavior of green agricultural products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Franzò, Simone & Doppio, Nicola & Natalicchio, Angelo & Frattini, Federico & Mion, Luca, 2023. "Designing innovation contests to support external knowledge search in small and medium-sized enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Bootz, Jean-Philippe & Michel, Sophie & Pallud, Jessie & Monti, Régine, 2022. "Possible changes of Industry 4.0 in 2030 in the face of uberization: Results of a participatory and systemic foresight study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Ma, Shiyu & Gao, Yuguo & Li, Hui, 2024. "Digital economic, resource curse and the development of low-carbon transformation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Le, Hoang Tran Phuoc Mai & Park, Jungkun & Lee, Sangwoo, 2023. "Emotion and trust in virtual service assistant design for effective service recovery," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Siltori, Patricia F.S. & Anholon, Rosley & Rampasso, Izabela Simon & Quelhas, Osvaldo L.G. & Santa-Eulalia, Luis A. & Leal Filho, Walter, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and corporate sustainability: An exploratory analysis of possible impacts in the Brazilian context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Wu, Linfei & Sun, Liwen & Chang, Qing & Zhang, Die & Qi, Peixiao, 2022. "How do digitalization capabilities enable open innovation in manufacturing enterprises? A multiple case study based on resource integration perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    13. Wang, Nan & Wan, Jiahao & Ma, Zhenzhong & Zhou, Yan & Chen, Jin, 2023. "How digital platform capabilities improve sustainable innovation performance of firms: The mediating role of open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Balci, Gökcay, 2021. "Digitalization in container shipping: Do perception and satisfaction regarding digital products in a non-technology industry affect overall customer loyalty?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Calış Duman, Meral & Akdemir, Bunyamin, 2021. "A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Simba, Amon & Tajeddin, Mahdi & Farashahi, Mehdi & Dana, Léo-Paul & Maleki, Amirhossein, 2024. "Internationalising high–tech SMEs: Advancing a new perspective of open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas, Rhodri & Wood, Emma, 2015. "The absorptive capacity of tourism organisations," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 84-99.
    2. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Noel Lindsay & Wendy Lindsay & Janice Jones, 2019. "Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 145-164, June.
    3. Daspit, Joshua J. & Long, Rebecca G. & Pearson, Allison W., 2019. "How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 133-143.
    4. Rachel Bocquet & Sandra Dubouloz, 2020. "Firm Openness and Managerial Innovation: Rebalancing Deliberate Actions and Institutional Pressures," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 43-74.
    5. Corral de Zubielqui, Graciela & Fryges, Helmut & Jones, Janice, 2019. "Social media, open innovation & HRM: Implications for performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 334-347.
    6. Mikko Moilanen & Stein Østbye & Kristin Woll, 2014. "Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 447-462, August.
    7. Miroshnychenko, Ivan & Strobl, Andreas & Matzler, Kurt & De Massis, Alfredo, 2021. "Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 670-682.
    8. Emre Yildiz, H. & Murtic, Adis & Klofsten, Magnus & Zander, Udo & Richtnér, Anders, 2021. "Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    10. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Latukha, M. & Veselova, A. & Selivanovskikh, L. & Artukh, E. & Mitskevich, E., 2016. "Re-thinking the role of talent management in a firm’s performance: Talent management practices and absorptive capacity," Working Papers 6442, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    12. Mario Schaarschmidt & Dirk Homscheid & Thomas Kilian, 2019. "Application Developer Engagement In Open Software Platforms: An Empirical Study Of Apple Ios And Google Android Developers," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-33, May.
    13. Pauline Ratnasingam, 2001. "The Need for Inter-Organizational-Trust in Web-Enabled Supply Chain Management," Vision, , vol. 5(1_suppl), pages 55-65, January.
    14. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Janice Jones & David Audretsch, 2019. "The influence of trust and collaboration with external partners on appropriability in open service firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 540-558, April.
    16. Zhou, Abby Jingzi & Fey, Carl & Yildiz, H. Emre, 2020. "Fostering integration through HRM practices: An empirical examination of absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    17. Paul Brockman & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Ying Zheng, 2022. "Does social trust affect international contracting? Evidence from foreign bond covenants," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1011-1044, August.
    18. Bengtsson, Lars & Ryzhkova, Natalia, 2013. "Managing a strategic source of innovation: Online users," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 655-662.
    19. Schaarschmidt, Mario & Kilian, Thomas, 2014. "Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 350-361.
    20. Santoro, Gabriele & Bresciani, Stefano & Papa, Armando, 2020. "Collaborative modes with Cultural and Creative Industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:161:y:2020:i:c:s0040162520311586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.