IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spomar/v16y2013i2p200-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational justice in intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of coaches

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Seungmo
  • Andrew, Damon P.S.

Abstract

Research indicates sport industry employees encounter organizational justice, or fairness perceptions, during resource distributions on the basis of what was distributed (distributive justice), how the distribution decision was reached (procedural justice), and how the distribution decision was communicated to the employee (interaction justice). This study's purpose was to explore coaches’ perceptions of fairness regarding current resource distribution systems in intercollegiate athletics in terms of types of sport (high profile sports vs. low profile sports) and participant gender (male participant sports vs. female participant sports). A total of 260 coaches from National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I, II, and III institutions in the United States responded through online surveys assessing three dimensions of organizational justice: distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Subsequently, tests for discriminant validity prompted the consolidation of the procedural and interactional justice dimensions. MANOVA tests found: (a) no significant main effect nor interaction effect for distributive justice and (b) main effects of type of sport and participant gender, but no interaction effect for procedural justice. Practical and broader theoretical implications for these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Seungmo & Andrew, Damon P.S., 2013. "Organizational justice in intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of coaches," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 200-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:16:y:2013:i:2:p:200-210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2012.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441352312000952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2012.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel F. Mahony & Mary A. Hums & Damon P.S. Andrew & Stephen W. Dittmore, 2010. "Organizational justice in sport," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 91-105, April.
    2. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:12:y:2004:i:9:p:1-14 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mahony, Daniel F. & Hums, Mary A. & Andrew, Damon P.S. & Dittmore, Stephen W., 2010. "Organizational justice in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 91-105, May.
    4. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    5. Daniel Mizak & Anthony Stair, 2004. "The relationship between payroll and performance disparity in major league baseball: an alternative measure," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerwin, Shannon & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Turner, Brian A., 2015. "Organizational justice and conflict: Do perceptions of fairness influence disagreement?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 384-395.
    2. Kim, Seungmo & Oh, Taeyeon & Lee, Soonhwan & Andrew, Damon P.S., 2019. "Relationships between met-expectation and attitudinal outcomes of coaches in intercollegiate athletics," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 477-490.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Seungmo & Oh, Taeyeon & Lee, Soonhwan & Andrew, Damon P.S., 2019. "Relationships between met-expectation and attitudinal outcomes of coaches in intercollegiate athletics," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 477-490.
    2. Kerwin, Shannon & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Turner, Brian A., 2015. "Organizational justice and conflict: Do perceptions of fairness influence disagreement?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 384-395.
    3. Sara Schmid & Rudolf Vetschera & Judit Lienert, 2021. "Testing Fairness Principles for Public Environmental Infrastructure Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 611-640, June.
    4. Chenot, David & Boutakidis, Ioakim & Benton, Amy D., 2014. "Equity and fairness perceptions in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 400-406.
    5. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Siegrist, Michael, 2012. "Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 292-300.
    6. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.
    7. Amar Fall & Fatéma Safy-Godineau & David Carassus, 2018. "Perceptions de justice organisationnelle dans les collectivités locales : quels impacts sur le bien-être psychologique au travail et sur l’intention de quitter des agents ?," Post-Print hal-02142237, HAL.
    8. Thuy-Van Tran & Sinikka Lepistö & Janne Järvinen, 2021. "The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 369-399, September.
    9. Alpenberg, Jan & Paul Scarbrough, D., 2018. "Trust and control in changing production environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 527-534.
    10. Dodgson, Mary Kate & Agoglia, Christopher P. & Bennett, G. Bradley, 2021. "The influence of relationship partners on client managers’ negotiation positions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Pujol-Cols, Lucas J. & Lazzaro-Salazar, Mariana, 2018. "Psychosocial risks and job satisfaction in argentinian scholars: exploring the moderating role of work engagement," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2966, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    12. Stephanie Hastings & Joan Finegan, 2011. "The Role of Ethical Ideology in Reactions to Injustice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(4), pages 689-703, June.
    13. Hakan Yalçın & Yeliz Yalçın, 2022. "A Meta Analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction: The Case of Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 51(2), pages 417-432, November.
    14. Turel, Ofir & Connelly, Catherine E., 2013. "Too busy to help: Antecedents and outcomes of interactional justice in web-based service encounters," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 674-683.
    15. Liebig, Stefan & Schupp, Jürgen, 2008. "Leistungs- oder Bedarfsgerechtigkeit? Über einen normativen Zielkonflikt des Wohlfahrtsstaats und seiner Bedeutung für die Bewertung des eigenen Erwerbseinkommens," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 7-30.
    16. van Dijke, Marius & Wildschut, Tim & Leunissen, Joost M. & Sedikides, Constantine, 2015. "Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 15-29.
    17. Tae-Soo Ha & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2023. "Distributive Justice, Goal Clarity, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Transactional and Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Lude, Maximilian & Prügl, Reinhard, 2021. "Experimental studies in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    19. Leong Weng, Lee & Muhammad Madi bin, Abdullah, 2019. "Organizational Justice and Employee Deviance among Emergency Services Personnel in Malaysia," Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Economics and Finance, Michael Laurence, vol. 1(4), pages 62-73.
    20. Suk-Kyu Kim & Yunduk Jeong, 2021. "Developing the Healthy and Competitive Organization in the Sports Environment: Focused on the Relationships between Organizational Justice, Empowerment and Job Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:16:y:2013:i:2:p:200-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/716936/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.