IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spomar/v18y2015i3p384-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational justice and conflict: Do perceptions of fairness influence disagreement?

Author

Listed:
  • Kerwin, Shannon
  • Jordan, Jeremy S.
  • Turner, Brian A.

Abstract

Organizational justice may be a vital factor in the development of conflict between personnel within sport organizations. Specifically, perceptions of injustice may increase the potential for disagreement regarding codes of conduct and organizational procedures. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of multiple dimensions of organizational justice (i.e., distributive, procedural, interactional, and informational) on the perception of intragroup conflict. Paid staff from 262 regional sport commissions and convention and visitors bureaus (CVBs) across the United States responded to an online study to measure perceptions of justice and conflict. Results indicating procedural, interactional, and informational justice predicted the perception of intragroup conflict in this setting. The unique impact of each type of justice may be explained by instrumental and relational models, which has implications for sport management theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerwin, Shannon & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Turner, Brian A., 2015. "Organizational justice and conflict: Do perceptions of fairness influence disagreement?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 384-395.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:384-395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441352314000886
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warren Whisenant & Michael Smucker, 2009. "Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction in Coaching," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 157-167, June.
    2. Daniel F. Mahony & Mary A. Hums & Damon P.S. Andrew & Stephen W. Dittmore, 2010. "Organizational justice in sport," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 91-105, April.
    3. Karen A. Jehn & Lindred Greer & Sheen Levine & Gabriel Szulanski, 2008. "The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 465-495, November.
    4. Mahony, Daniel F. & Hums, Mary A. & Andrew, Damon P.S. & Dittmore, Stephen W., 2010. "Organizational justice in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 91-105, May.
    5. Ambrose, Maureen L., 2002. "Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 803-812, September.
    6. Seungmo Kim & Damon P.S. Andrew, 2013. "Organizational justice in intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of coaches," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 200-210, April.
    7. Schminke, Marshall & Cropanzano, Russell & Rupp, Deborah E., 2002. "Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 881-905, September.
    8. Olkkonen, Maria-Elena & Lipponen, Jukka, 2006. "Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 202-215, July.
    9. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    10. Greenberg, Jerald, 1993. "Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 81-103, February.
    11. Kim, Seungmo & Andrew, Damon P.S., 2013. "Organizational justice in intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of coaches," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 200-210.
    12. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1987. "Practical Issues in Structural Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(1), pages 78-117, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katja Kerman & Roman Prem & Bettina Kubicek & Edo Meyer & Sara Tement & Christian Korunka, 2022. "Conflict at Work Impairs Physiological Recovery during Sleep: A Daily Diary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Wang, Nan & Sun, Yongqiang & Shen, Xiao-Liang & Zhang, Xi, 2018. "A value-justice model of knowledge integration in wikis: The moderating role of knowledge equivocality," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 64-75.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Seungmo & Oh, Taeyeon & Lee, Soonhwan & Andrew, Damon P.S., 2019. "Relationships between met-expectation and attitudinal outcomes of coaches in intercollegiate athletics," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 477-490.
    2. Ambrose, Maureen L., 2002. "Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 803-812, September.
    3. Sangeeta Sahu & Avinash D. Pathardikar, 2014. "Job Cognition and Justice Influencing Organizational Attachment," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    4. Kim, Seungmo & Andrew, Damon P.S., 2013. "Organizational justice in intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of coaches," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 200-210.
    5. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    6. Hang-yue Ngo & Raymond Loi & Sharon Foley & Xiaoming Zheng & Lingqing Zhang, 2013. "Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 149-168, March.
    7. Rupp, Deborah E. & Shao, Ruodan & Jones, Kisha S. & Liao, Hui, 2014. "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and socia," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 159-185.
    8. Kedar Bhatt, 2020. "Measuring service fairness and its impact on service quality and satisfaction: a study of Indian Banking Services," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 35-44, June.
    9. Patel, Charmi & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup, 2012. "Overall justice, work group identification and work outcomes: Test of moderated mediation process," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 213-222.
    10. Valérie Barraud-Didier & Marie-Christine Henninger & Geneviève Nguyen, 2015. "Les agriculteurs sont-ils traités justement par leur coopérative?," Post-Print hal-02632236, HAL.
    11. Thomas Tang & Hsi Liu, 2012. "Love of Money and Unethical Behavior Intention: Does an Authentic Supervisor’s Personal Integrity and Character (ASPIRE) Make a Difference?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 295-312, May.
    12. Elisaveta Sardžoska & Thomas Tang, 2015. "Monetary Intelligence: Money Attitudes—Unethical Intentions, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Job Satisfaction, and Coping Strategies Across Public and Private Sectors in Macedonia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 93-115, August.
    13. Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Toto Sutarso & Mahfooz A. Ansari & Vivien Kim Geok Lim & Thompson Sian Hin Teo & Fernando Arias-Galicia & Ilya E. Garber & Randy Ki-Kwan Chiu & Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Roberto, 2018. "Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics Across 32 Cultures: Good Apples Enjoy Good Quality of Life in Good Barrels," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 893-917, April.
    14. Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Toto Sutarso & Mahfooz A. Ansari & Vivien K. G. Lim & Thompson S. H. Teo & Fernando Arias-Galicia & Ilya E. Garber & Randy Ki-Kwan Chiu & Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Roberto Luna-, 2018. "Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect—Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 919-937, April.
    15. Mariam Farooq & Omer Farooq & Walid Cheffi, 2019. "How Do Employees Respond to the CSR Initiatives of their Organizations: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Yajiong Xue & Huigang Liang & Liansheng Wu, 2011. "Punishment, Justice, and Compliance in Mandatory IT Settings," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 400-414, June.
    17. Lukasz Derdowski & Torvald Øgaard & Einar Marnburg & Gro Ellen Mathisen, 2018. "Creative and innovative behaviours of corporate directors: an elusive role of task-related conflicts," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 1045-1069, December.
    18. Elizabeth E. Umphress & John B. Bingham, 2011. "When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 621-640, June.
    19. Turel, Ofir & Connelly, Catherine E., 2013. "Too busy to help: Antecedents and outcomes of interactional justice in web-based service encounters," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 674-683.
    20. Sara Schmid & Rudolf Vetschera & Judit Lienert, 2021. "Testing Fairness Principles for Public Environmental Infrastructure Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 611-640, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:384-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/716936/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.