IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v356y2024ics0277953624006002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Barely keeping the wheels on the trolley’: A qualitative study of the New Zealand COVID Tracer App

Author

Listed:
  • Elers, Phoebe
  • Derrett, Sarah
  • Emery, Tepora
  • Chambers, Tim

Abstract

Digital contact tracing apps were developed to help control the spread of COVID-19 but research exploring these apps has underrepresented both ‘at-risk’ communities and contact tracers. Our study examines perspectives of the New Zealand COVID Tracer app among 53 participants, comprising policy advisors, contact tracers, and Māori, Pacific, and disability stakeholders, underpinned by the theory of social construction of which positions technology within the social context in which it evolves, operates, and is negotiated. Although community stakeholders believed the app helped safeguard communities from COVID-19, the health officials' views on the app's usefulness in contact tracing varied. Participants who oversaw the app's technical development generally perceived it as being more useful, particularly regarding Bluetooth proximity detection, in contrast with contact tracers' perceptions. The findings highlight a disconnection between public sentiment and operational reality in the use of the app and the need for improved collaboration and consultation in future contact tracing responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Elers, Phoebe & Derrett, Sarah & Emery, Tepora & Chambers, Tim, 2024. "‘Barely keeping the wheels on the trolley’: A qualitative study of the New Zealand COVID Tracer App," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624006002
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624006002
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624006002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.