IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v347y2024ics0277953624002065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes to multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for population-based screening: A qualitative study in Great Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Schmeising-Barnes, Ninian
  • Waller, Jo
  • Marlow, Laura A.V.

Abstract

Trials are underway to test the clinical utility of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for screening asymptomatic individuals. We sought to understand the acceptability of MCED blood test screening and potential barriers and facilitators to participation among the general public.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmeising-Barnes, Ninian & Waller, Jo & Marlow, Laura A.V., 2024. "Attitudes to multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for population-based screening: A qualitative study in Great Britain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:347:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624002065
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624002065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Byrne, 2022. "A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1391-1412, June.
    2. Heather Gelhorn & Melissa M. Ross & Anuraag R. Kansal & Eric T. Fung & Michael V. Seiden & Nicolas Krucien & Karen C. Chung, 2023. "Patient Preferences for Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) Screening Tests," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(1), pages 43-56, January.
    3. McCaffery, Kirsten & Borril, Jo & Williamson, Sara & Taylor, Tamara & Sutton, Stephen & Atkin, Wendy & Wardle, Jane, 2001. "Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: : a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 679-691, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chapple, Alison & Ziebland, Sue & Hewitson, Paul & McPherson, Ann, 2008. "What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2425-2435, June.
    2. Flourensia Sapty Rahayu & Lukito Edi Nugroho & Ridi Ferdiana & Djoko Budiyanto Setyohadi, 2022. "Motivation and Engagement of Final-Year Students When Using E-learning: A Qualitative Study of Gamification in Pandemic Situation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Araz Zirar, 2023. "Can artificial intelligence’s limitations drive innovative work behaviour?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 2005-2034, August.
    4. Chia‐Chi Lee & Shih‐Yun Kuo & Huang‐Hsiung Hsu & Tung‐Li Mo & En‐Yu Chang & Kuan‐Chun Huang, 2023. "How does the research community contribute to corporate climate‐related risk disclosures? The gap between ideals and reality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 927-940, March.
    5. Aslam, Usman & Davis, Leon, 2024. "Analyzing consumer expectations and experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) apps in the fashion retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Marwitz, Ulrike & Higgins, Daryl J. & Whelan, Thomas, 2024. "“Kids are in the middle of it” – Child protection practitioners reflect on indicators of coercive control and situational couple violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Paul Marshall & Steven Jones & Patricia Gooding & Heather Robinson & Fiona Lobban, 2022. "Caring for a Family Member with Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder Who Has Experienced Suicidal Behaviour: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of an Online Peer-Support Forum," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Martin C S Wong & Jessica Y L Ching & Hoyee H Hirai & Thomas Y T Lam & Sian M Griffiths & Francis K L Chan & Joseph J Y Sung, 2013. "Perceived Obstacles of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Their Associated Factors among 10,078 Chinese Participants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Hanadi Fahad Alothman & Lina Bashatah & Abdulaziz Salem Aldossari & Mousa S. Alfaifi & Abdullah Almutairi & Abdulrahman A. Alshuaibi & Hayat Abdulrahman Alajlan & Safana Aseri & Ahmad Yahya Aseery & N, 2024. "How Saudi parents rationalize the choice of school for their children," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Aaqilah Bhamjee & Talita le Roux & De Wet Swanepoel & Marien Alet Graham & Kurt Schlemmer & Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, 2022. "Perceptions of Telehealth Services for Hearing Loss in South Africa’s Public Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    11. António Quintas-Mendes & Ana Paiva, 2023. "Digital Presence and Online Identity among Digital Scholars: A Thematic Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Shee Mun Yong, 2023. "4th Industry Revolution Digital Marketing Adoption Challenges in SMEs and its Effect on Customer Responsiveness," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(2), pages 152-172.
    13. Maria Olga Tomprou, 2023. "Opportunities and Challenges for the Creation and Governance of Productive Landscapes in Urban Transformations: The Case of Klosterøya Urban Fruit Forest Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Jennifer R. Pharr & Emylia Terry & André Wade & Amanda Haboush-Deloye & Erika Marquez & Nevada Minority Health and Equity Coalition, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 on Sexual and Gender Minority Communities: Focus Group Discussions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Sharma, Kavita & Walters, Gretchen & Metzger, Marc J. & Ghazoul, Jaboury, 2023. "Glocal woodlands – The rescaling of forest governance in Scotland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    16. Beyer, Kirsten M.M. & Comstock, Sara & Seagren, Renea & Rushton, Gerard, 2011. "Explaining place-based colorectal cancer health disparities: Evidence from a rural context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 373-382, February.
    17. Jorge Alahan Hernández Quirama, 2024. "Small-scale family famers’ perceptions of food security in their respective communities in la macarena meta, Columbia," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(8), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2023. "The Global Whitewashing of Smart Cities: Citizens’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Le Bonniec, Alice & Meade, Oonagh & Fredrix, Milou & Morrissey, Eimear & O'Carroll, Ronan E. & Murphy, Patrick J. & Murphy, Andrew W. & Mc Sharry, Jenny, 2023. "Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    20. Kai Lehikoinen & Satu Tuittila, 2024. "Arts‐based approaches for futures workshops: Creating and interpreting artistic futures images," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:347:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624002065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.