IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v202y2024ics1364032124004003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and economic assessment of hydrothermal-treatment-coupled anaerobic digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Chiqian
  • Rahnuma, Kainat
  • Hou, Liyuan
  • Liu, Xiaoguang
  • Tang, Yuanzhi
  • Pavlostathis, Spyros G.

Abstract

Hydrothermal treatment enhances biomethane (renewable energy source) production from the anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage sludge but requires substantial energy (heat). A complete energy and economic analysis for a hydrothermal-treatment-coupled anaerobic digestion system is missing. This study comprehensively analyzes the energy and economic aspects of three hydrothermal-treatment-coupled anaerobic digestion systems and a control for municipal sludge treatment: A control (anaerobic digestion only), a pre-stage system, an inter-stage system, and a post-stage/recycle system. The large energy consumption of hydrothermal treatment challenges the overall energy and economic neutrality in the systems. Hydrothermal treatment is economically beneficial only if it is conducted at a low or moderate temperature (100 to 130 °C), when the raw sludge has a high content of complex organic matter (especially particulate organic matter), and when the control has a low biogas yield. To reduce the energy burden of hydrothermal treatment and make the systems more economically beneficial, this study proposes to use direct sunlight as a “free,” renewable energy source to conduct hydrothermal treatment. In addition, the energy consumption of hydrothermal treatment can be reduced by separating the solids and liquid fractions in sludge using centrifugation and applying hydrothermal treatment to only the solids. Recovering carbon dioxide from the biogas has significant environmental and economic benefits. Among the alternatives, the post-stage/recycle system is more beneficial from an economic viewpoint and should be considered in future studies. Conversely, the inter-stage system should be avoided because it is more complex to maintain, requires a larger footprint, and has less significant economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Chiqian & Rahnuma, Kainat & Hou, Liyuan & Liu, Xiaoguang & Tang, Yuanzhi & Pavlostathis, Spyros G., 2024. "Energy and economic assessment of hydrothermal-treatment-coupled anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:202:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004003
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004003
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Huan & Jin, Chang & Zhang, Zhanying & O'Hara, Ian & Mundree, Sagadevan, 2017. "Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of energy recovery from sewage sludge through different anaerobic digestion pathways," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 649-657.
    2. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    3. You Jin Kwon & Dong Kun Lee, 2019. "Thermal Comfort and Longwave Radiation over Time in Urban Residential Complexes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Hosseini Koupaie, E. & Lin, L. & Bazyar Lakeh, A.A. & Azizi, A. & Dhar, B.R. & Hafez, H. & Elbeshbishy, E., 2021. "Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation processes coupled with thermal hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Yuan, Tian & Cheng, Yanfei & Zhang, Zhenya & Lei, Zhongfang & Shimizu, Kazuya, 2019. "Comparative study on hydrothermal treatment as pre- and post-treatment of anaerobic digestion of primary sludge: Focus on energy balance, resources transformation and sludge dewaterability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 171-180.
    6. Gabriele Di Giacomo & Pietro Romano, 2022. "Evolution and Prospects in Managing Sewage Sludge Resulting from Municipal Wastewater Purification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-33, August.
    7. Pavlo Bohutskyi & Duc Phan & Ruth E. Spierling & Trygve J. Lundquist, 2023. "Hydrothermal but Not Mechanical Pretreatment of Wastewater Algae Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion Energy Balance due to Improved Biomass Disintegration and Methane Production Kinetics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Sabiha, M.A. & Saidur, R. & Mekhilef, Saad & Mahian, Omid, 2015. "Progress and latest developments of evacuated tube solar collectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1038-1054.
    9. Gianluca Caposciutti & Andrea Baccioli & Lorenzo Ferrari & Umberto Desideri, 2020. "Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion: Power Generation or Biomethane Production?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Arsalis, Alexandros & Kær, Søren K. & Nielsen, Mads P., 2015. "Modeling and optimization of a heat-pump-assisted high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell micro-combined-heat-and-power system for residential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 569-581.
    11. Liu, Xiaoguang & Wang, Qian & Tang, Yuanzhi & Pavlostathis, Spyros G., 2021. "A comparative study on biogas production, energy balance, and nutrients conversion with inter-stage hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    12. Shi, Yi & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "A multi-objective approach to kitchen waste and excess sludge co-digestion for biomethane production with anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    13. Aragón-Briceño, C. & Ross, A.B. & Camargo-Valero, M.A., 2017. "Evaluation and comparison of product yields and bio-methane potential in sewage digestate following hydrothermal treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1357-1369.
    14. Zupančič, G.D. & Roš, M., 2003. "Heat and energy requirements in thermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 2255-2267.
    15. Shuhong Li & Jie Ding & Xiaosong Zhang & Deyuan Cheng & Xinyu Hu & Xianliang Li, 2016. "A feasible energy-saving analysis of a new system for CO2 cryogenic capture," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 235-239.
    16. Li, Chunxing & Wang, Yu & Xie, Shengyu & Wang, Ruming & Sheng, Hu & Yang, Hongmin & Yuan, Zengwei, 2024. "Synergistic treatment of sewage sludge and food waste digestate residues for efficient energy recovery and biochar preparation by hydrothermal pretreatment, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    17. Hilkiah Igoni, A. & Ayotamuno, M.J. & Eze, C.L. & Ogaji, S.O.T. & Probert, S.D., 2008. "Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(6), pages 430-438, June.
    18. Arun Shankar, Vishnu Kalaiselvan & Umashankar, Subramaniam & Paramasivam, Shanmugam & Hanigovszki, Norbert, 2016. "A comprehensive review on energy efficiency enhancement initiatives in centrifugal pumping system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 495-513.
    19. Ruolin L. Bai & Lei Jin & Shurui R. Sun & Yang Cheng & Yi Wei, 2022. "Quantification of greenhouse gas emission from wastewater treatment plants," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(5), pages 587-601, October.
    20. Cullen, Jonathan M. & Allwood, Julian M., 2010. "Theoretical efficiency limits for energy conversion devices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2059-2069.
    21. Kavitha, S. & Banu, J. Rajesh & Priya, A. Arul & Uan, Do Khac & Yeom, Ick Tae, 2017. "Liquefaction of food waste and its impacts on anaerobic biodegradability, energy ratio and economic feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 228-238.
    22. Nges, Ivo Achu & Liu, Jing, 2010. "Effects of solid retention time on anaerobic digestion of dewatered-sewage sludge in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2200-2206.
    23. Thomas Baumgartner & Lydia Jahn & Vanessa Parravicini & Karl Svardal & Jörg Krampe, 2022. "Efficiency of Sidestream Nitritation for Modern Two-Stage Activated Sludge Plants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    24. Liu, Xiaoyan & Zhu, Fenfen & Zhang, Rongyan & Zhao, Luyao & Qi, Juanjuan, 2021. "Recent progress on biodiesel production from municipal sewage sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    25. Smith, Thomas B., 2004. "Electricity theft: a comparative analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(18), pages 2067-2076, December.
    26. Joanna Mikusińska & Monika Kuźnia & Klaudia Czerwińska & Małgorzata Wilk, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Digestate Produced in the Biogas Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M. & Llorca, M., 2018. "Power Sector Reform and Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1801, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Md. Nazmul Hasan & Rafia Nishat Toma & Abdullah-Al Nahid & M M Manjurul Islam & Jong-Myon Kim, 2019. "Electricity Theft Detection in Smart Grid Systems: A CNN-LSTM Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Daví-Arderius, Daniel & Sanin, María-Eugenia & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2017. "CO2 content of electricity losses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 439-445.
    5. Cudjoe, Dan & Wang, Hong & zhu, Bangzhu, 2022. "Thermochemical treatment of daily COVID-19 single-use facemask waste: Power generation potential and environmental impact analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Xu, Jintao & Chen, Fei & Xia, Entong & Gao, Chong & Deng, Chenggang, 2020. "An optimization design method and optical performance analysis on multi-sectioned compound parabolic concentrator with cylindrical absorber," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Svetlana Zueva & Andrey A. Kovalev & Yury V. Litti & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Valentina Innocenzi & Ida De Michelis, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Aspects of Biomethane Production from Organic Waste in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-8, August.
    8. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    9. Costa-Campi, Maria Teresa & Daví-Arderius, Daniel & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2018. "The economic impact of electricity losses," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 309-322.
    10. Foteini Sakaveli & Maria Petala & Vasilios Tsiridis & Efthymios Darakas, 2024. "Enhancing Methane Yield in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Primary Sewage Sludge: A Comprehensive Review on Potential Additives and Strategies," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Mona Chitnis, Roger Fouquet, and Steve Sorrell, 2020. "Rebound Effects for Household Energy Services in the UK," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 31-60.
    12. Omar, M.N. & Samak, A.A. & Keshek, M.H. & Elsisi, S.F., 2020. "Simulation and validation model for using the energy produced from broiler litter waste in their house and its requirement of energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 920-928.
    13. Netzah Calamaro & Yuval Beck & Ran Ben Melech & Doron Shmilovitz, 2021. "An Energy-Fraud Detection-System Capable of Distinguishing Frauds from Other Energy Flow Anomalies in an Urban Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-38, September.
    14. Hijazi, O. & Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Amer, B.M.A. & Amer, M.A. & Badr, M. & Bernhardt, H., 2020. "Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 417-424.
    15. Fernández Oro, J.M. & Barrio Perotti, R. & Galdo Vega, M. & González, J., 2023. "Effect of the radial gap size on the deterministic flow in a centrifugal pump due to impeller-tongue interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    16. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    17. Mazur, Christoph & Hoegerle, Yannick & Brucoli, Maria & van Dam, Koen & Guo, Miao & Markides, Christos N. & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "A holistic resilience framework development for rural power systems in emerging economies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 219-232.
    18. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    19. Johnson, Hilary A. & Simon, Kevin P. & Slocum, Alexander H., 2021. "Data analytics and pump control in a wastewater treatment plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    20. Min, Brian & Golden, Miriam, 2014. "Electoral cycles in electricity losses in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 619-625.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:202:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.