IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v239y2019icp171-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on hydrothermal treatment as pre- and post-treatment of anaerobic digestion of primary sludge: Focus on energy balance, resources transformation and sludge dewaterability

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Tian
  • Cheng, Yanfei
  • Zhang, Zhenya
  • Lei, Zhongfang
  • Shimizu, Kazuya

Abstract

Hydrothermal treatment (HTT) has been recognized as a highly efficient technology for organics decomposition and energy/nutrients recovery from waste biomass. Up to now, however, the efficiency of HTT as the pre- and post-treatment of anaerobic digestion (AD) has not been well compared and documented. In this study, the effects of HTT as the pre- (strategy I, HTT + AD) and post-treatment (strategy II, 1st AD + HTT + 2nd AD) of AD of primary sludge were evaluated based on comparative experiments in regards to energy balance, nutrients transformation, and sludge dewaterability. Results show that the optimal HTT temperature was 130 °C for strategy I and strategy II according to the maximum methane production rate (μ) estimated from Gompertz model and the net energy gain (ΔQ) calculated. Although HTT as the post-treatment of AD achieved higher total methane yield and solids reduction, the increment of methane yield was found to be similar through both strategies compared to their control counterparts (no HTT). The decomposition of insoluble organic carbon was also similar via both strategies. Insoluble nitrogen fraction was detected to be the lowest (6.8%) after HTT at 190 °C in strategy II, comparable to that after HTT at 210 °C (∼10.0%) using strategy I. The proportion of bioavailable phosphorus was found to slightly decrease with the increase of HTT temperature in strategy II, probably due to the alkaline pH in the treated digestate. The sludge dewaterability indicated by specific resistance to filtration (SRF) showed a similar trend after AD under the tested conditions of both strategies, which was remarkably improved when HTT was performed at temperatures higher than 170 °C. HTT as the pre-treatment (strategy I) was found to be more energy efficient in comparison to HTT as the post-treatment (strategy II) of AD of primary sludge. In addition, a positive energy efficiency could be achieved when the sludge solids content ≥2.2%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Tian & Cheng, Yanfei & Zhang, Zhenya & Lei, Zhongfang & Shimizu, Kazuya, 2019. "Comparative study on hydrothermal treatment as pre- and post-treatment of anaerobic digestion of primary sludge: Focus on energy balance, resources transformation and sludge dewaterability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 171-180.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:239:y:2019:i:c:p:171-180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919302259
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aaron E. Brown & Jessica M. M. Adams & Oliver R. Grasham & Miller Alonso Camargo-Valero & Andrew B. Ross, 2020. "An Assessment of Different Integration Strategies of Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Kim, Seunghwan & Lee, Changmin & Young Kim, Jae, 2023. "Effects of alkaline thermal hydrolysis on the formation of refractory compounds and energy balance of anaerobic digestion of cattle manure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    3. Chen, Jiaxin & Zhang, Xiaolei & Tyagi, Rajeshwar Dayal, 2021. "Impact of nitrogen on the industrial feasibility of biodiesel production from lipid accumulated in oleaginous yeast with wastewater sludge and crude glycerol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. De Sanctis, M. & Chimienti, S. & Pastore, C. & Piergrossi, V. & Di Iaconi, C., 2019. "Energy efficiency improvement of thermal hydrolysis and anaerobic digestion of Posidonia oceanica residues," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Pecchi, Matteo & Patuzzi, Francesco & Benedetti, Vittoria & Di Maggio, Rosa & Baratieri, Marco, 2020. "Kinetic analysis of hydrothermal carbonization using high-pressure differential scanning calorimetry applied to biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Bolzonella, D. & Battista, F. & Mattioli, A. & Nicolato, C. & Frison, N. & Lampis, S., 2020. "Biological thermophilic post hydrolysis of digestate enhances the biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of agro-waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Malhotra, Milan & Aboudi, Kaoutar & Pisharody, Lakshmi & Singh, Ayush & Banu, J. Rajesh & Bhatia, Shashi Kant & Varjani, Sunita & Kumar, Sunil & González-Fernández, Cristina & Kumar, Sumant & Singh, R, 2022. "Biorefinery of anaerobic digestate in a circular bioeconomy: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Gianluca Caposciutti & Andrea Baccioli & Lorenzo Ferrari & Umberto Desideri, 2020. "Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion: Power Generation or Biomethane Production?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Foteini Sakaveli & Maria Petala & Vasilios Tsiridis & Efthymios Darakas, 2024. "Enhancing Methane Yield in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Primary Sewage Sludge: A Comprehensive Review on Potential Additives and Strategies," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Oliva, A. & Tan, L.C. & Papirio, S. & Esposito, G. & Lens, P.N.L., 2021. "Effect of methanol-organosolv pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1000-1012.
    11. Deng, Chen & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Wu, Benteng & O’Shea, Richard & Murphy, Jerry D., 2020. "Improving gaseous biofuel yield from seaweed through a cascading circular bioenergy system integrating anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Azman, Samet & Milh, Hannah & Somers, Matthijs H. & Zhang, Huili & Huybrechts, Ine & Meers, Erik & Meesschaert, Boudewijn & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2020. "Ultrasound-assisted digestate treatment of manure digestate for increased biogas production in small pilot scale anaerobic digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 664-673.
    13. Li, Chunxing & Wang, Yu & Xie, Shengyu & Wang, Ruming & Sheng, Hu & Yang, Hongmin & Yuan, Zengwei, 2024. "Synergistic treatment of sewage sludge and food waste digestate residues for efficient energy recovery and biochar preparation by hydrothermal pretreatment, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    14. Liu, Xiaoguang & Wang, Qian & Tang, Yuanzhi & Pavlostathis, Spyros G., 2021. "A comparative study on biogas production, energy balance, and nutrients conversion with inter-stage hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    15. Çelebi, Emrehan Berkay & Aksoy, Ayşegül & Sanin, F. Dilek, 2021. "Maximizing the energy potential of urban sludge treatment: An experimental study and a scenario-based energy analysis focusing on anaerobic digestion with ultrasound pretreatment and sludge combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Ma, Shuaishuai & Wang, Hongliang & Li, Longrui & Gu, Xiaohui & Zhu, Wanbin, 2021. "Enhanced biomethane production from corn straw by a novel anaerobic digestion strategy with mechanochemical pretreatment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2019. "Improvement of energy recovery from the digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) through intermediate treatments: The effect of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the first-stage digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 191-204.
    18. Cristiane Romio & Michael Vedel Wegener Kofoed & Henrik Bjarne Møller, 2021. "Digestate Post-Treatment Strategies for Additional Biogas Recovery: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Lina Luo & Youpei Qu & Weijia Gong & Liyuan Qin & Wenzhe Li & Yong Sun, 2021. "Effect of Particle Size on the Aerobic and Anaerobic Digestion Characteristics of Whole Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Liu, Yang & He, Pinjing & Duan, Haowen & Shao, Liming & Lü, Fan, 2021. "Low calcium dosage favors methanation of long-chain fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    21. Gregor Sailer & Julian Comi & Florian Empl & Martin Silberhorn & Valeska Heymann & Monika Bosilj & Siham Ouardi & Stefan Pelz & Joachim Müller, 2022. "Hydrothermal Treatment of Residual Forest Wood (Softwood) and Digestate from Anaerobic Digestion—Influence of Temperature and Holding Time on the Characteristics of the Solid and Liquid Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    22. Zhang, Yangyang & Li, Huan & Li, Debin, 2021. "Maximize methane recovery from sludge anaerobic digestion by combining an optimal wet air oxidation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 359-369.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hui & Zeng, Shufang & Pan, Xiaoli & Liu, Lei & Chen, Yunjie & Tang, Jiawei & Luo, Feng, 2022. "Bioelectrochemically assisting anaerobic digestion enhanced methane production under low-temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1071-1083.
    2. Huang, Bao-Cheng & He, Chuan-Shu & Fan, Nian-Si & Jin, Ren-Cun & Yu, Han-Qing, 2020. "Envisaging wastewater-to-energy practices for sustainable urban water pollution control: Current achievements and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Chen, Yi-di & Li, Suping & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Wang, Chengyu & Lin, Yen-Chang & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Ren, Nan-qi, 2018. "Integration of sludge digestion and microalgae cultivation for enhancing bioenergy and biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 76-90.
    4. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Mahsa Nabizadeh Mashizi & Mohammad Hossein Bagheripour & Mohammad Mostafa Jafari & Ehsan Yaghoubi, 2023. "Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of a Stabilized Sand Using Geopolymer Made of Wastes and a Natural Pozzolan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Cristiane Romio & Michael Vedel Wegener Kofoed & Henrik Bjarne Møller, 2021. "Digestate Post-Treatment Strategies for Additional Biogas Recovery: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2019. "Improvement of energy recovery from the digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) through intermediate treatments: The effect of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the first-stage digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 191-204.
    8. Hosseini Koupaie, E. & Lin, L. & Bazyar Lakeh, A.A. & Azizi, A. & Dhar, B.R. & Hafez, H. & Elbeshbishy, E., 2021. "Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation processes coupled with thermal hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Yu, Lu & Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen & Shen, Yanwen, 2021. "How does choline change methanogenesis pathway in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Magdalena Budych-Gorzna & Beata Szatkowska & Lukasz Jaroszynski & Bjarne Paulsrud & Ewelina Jankowska & Tymoteusz Jaroszynski & Piotr Oleskowicz-Popiel, 2021. "Towards an Energy Self-Sufficient Resource Recovery Facility by Improving Energy and Economic Balance of a Municipal WWTP with Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Yin, Changkai & Shen, Yanwen & Zhu, Nanwen & Huang, Qiujie & Lou, Ziyang & Yuan, Haiping, 2018. "Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with incineration bottom ash: Enhanced methane production and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 503-511.
    12. Jiang, Y. & Xie, S.H. & Dennehy, C. & Lawlor, P.G. & Hu, Z.H. & Wu, G.X. & Zhan, X.M. & Gardiner, G.E., 2020. "Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Mohd Imran Siddiqui & Izharul Haq Farooqi & Farrukh Basheer & Hasan Rameez & Mohamed Hasnain Isa, 2023. "Pretreatment of Slaughterhouse Effluent Treatment Plant Sludge Using Electro-Fenton Process for Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Ma, Shuaishuai & Li, Yuling & Li, Jingxue & Yu, Xiaona & Cui, Zongjun & Yuan, Xufeng & Zhu, Wanbin & Wang, Hongliang, 2022. "Features of single and combined technologies for lignocellulose pretreatment to enhance biomethane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Elagroudy, S. & Radwan, A.G. & Banadda, N. & Mostafa, Nagwan G. & Owusu, P.A. & Janajreh, I., 2020. "Mathematical models comparison of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of microwave pretreated mixed sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1009-1020.
    18. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    19. Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Zieliński & Izabela Bartkowska & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Effect of Acid Whey Pretreatment Using Ultrasonic Disintegration on the Removal of Organic Compounds and Anaerobic Digestion Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Zhen, Guangyin & Pan, Yang & Lu, Xueqin & Li, Yu-You & Zhang, Zhongyi & Niu, Chengxin & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Kobayashi, Takuro & Zhao, Youcai & Xu, Kaiqin, 2019. "Anaerobic membrane bioreactor towards biowaste biorefinery and chemical energy harvest: Recent progress, membrane fouling and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:239:y:2019:i:c:p:171-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.