IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v115y2019ics1364032119306161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

Author

Listed:
  • Withey, Patrick
  • Johnston, Craig
  • Guo, Jinggang

Abstract

This study provides estimates of the global warming potential (GWP) of carbon dioxide emissions from bioenergy produced from forests (termed GWPbio). The specific contribution of the study is twofold. First, we consider how GWPbio will be impacted by the inclusion of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) technology. Second, we determine how the assumed baseline or reference scenario impacts GWPbio, considering both bioenergy harvests from currently unmanaged land and harvest residues from currently managed forest lands. BECCS is a major component in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios that highlight pathways to reduced climate change impacts, and results of this study will inform the viability of using BECCS in forestry to meet IPCC emissions goals. By considering multiple scenarios and using a full carbon-accounting through the inclusion of all carbon pools impacted by harvesting for bioenergy, we demonstrate the conditions under which the value of GWPbio is negative, and thus BECCS acts as a negative emissions technology. Results indicate that assuming a 100-year horizon, GWPbio can vary from between -0.92 and 1.57, depending on a variety of assumptions and whether BECCS is employed. Estimated GWPbio values indicate that bioenergy exceeds the climate impact of fossil fuels if one focuses on unmanaged lands and does not employ BECCS. If one harvests residues from currently managed lands, bioenergy is preferable to fossil fuels without BECCS, but GWPbio is positive. When considering BECCS, bioenergy will have a lower GWP than fossil fuels in all scenarios but will only produce negative emissions if residues are used from currently managed forest lands. The results of this work indicate that bioenergy from forests can only be used to meet IPCC policy goals (produce negative emissions) if BECCS is used on currently managed forest land.

Suggested Citation

  • Withey, Patrick & Johnston, Craig & Guo, Jinggang, 2019. "Quantifying the global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:115:y:2019:i:c:s1364032119306161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119306161
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kraxner, Florian & Aoki, Kentaro & Leduc, Sylvain & Kindermann, Georg & Fuss, Sabine & Yang, Jue & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Tak, Kwang-Il & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "BECCS in South Korea—Analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 102-108.
    2. Alice Larkin & Jaise Kuriakose & Maria Sharmina & Kevin Anderson, 2018. "What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 690-714, July.
    3. Alice Favero & Robert Mendelsohn & Brent Sohngen, 2016. "Carbon Storage and Bioenergy: Using Forests for Climate Mitigation," Working Papers 2016.09, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Kim Pingoud & Tommi Ekholm & Ilkka Savolainen, 2012. "Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 369-386, April.
    5. Vassilis Stavrakas & Niki-Artemis Spyridaki & Alexandros Flamos, 2018. "Striving towards the Deployment of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): A Review of Research Priorities and Assessment Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    6. P. A. Turner & K. J. Mach & D. B. Lobell & S. M. Benson & E. Baik & D. L. Sanchez & C. B. Field, 2018. "The global overlap of bioenergy and carbon sequestration potential," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vajjarapu, Harsha & Verma, Ashish, 2022. "Understanding the mitigation potential of sustainable urban transport measures across income and gender groups," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Yi Cheng & Chuzhi Zhao & Pradeep Neupane & Bradley Benjamin & Jiawei Wang & Tongsheng Zhang, 2023. "Applicability and Trend of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Bioenergy Research between 1991–2021: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Kinsella, L. & Stefaniec, A. & Foley, A. & Caulfield, B., 2023. "Pathways to decarbonising the transport sector: The impacts of electrifying taxi fleets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Galán-Martín, Ángel & Contreras, María del Mar & Romero, Inmaculada & Ruiz, Encarnación & Bueno-Rodríguez, Salvador & Eliche-Quesada, Dolores & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio, 2022. "The potential role of olive groves to deliver carbon dioxide removal in a carbon-neutral Europe: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Hao, Hongke & Dai, Li & Wang, Kui & Xu, Junming & Liu, Weiguo, 2021. "An updated framework for climate change impact assessment of bioenergy and an application in poplar biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    6. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Chen, Yifeng & Khokarale, Santosh Govind & Bui, Thai Q. & Weiland, Fredrik & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Rudolfsson, Magnus & Mikkola, Jyri-Pekka & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Towards negative carbon emissions: Carbon capture in bio-syngas from gasification by aqueous pentaethylenehexamine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Pedro Macedo & Mara Madaleno, 2022. "Global Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Nexus: Evidence from a Maximum Entropy Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Loman Michal & Šarkan Branislav & Skrúcaný Tomáš, 2021. "Influence of Cruise Control Use on Vehicle´s Consumption," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 13-24, May.
    9. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2022. "Extended graphical approach for the implementation of energy-consuming negative emission technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Guohui Song & Qi Zhao & Baohua Shao & Hao Zhao & Hongyan Wang & Wenyi Tan, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and NO x Emissions of Power-to-H 2 -to-Power Technology Integrated with Hydrogen-Fueled Gas Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Lee, Jaejun & Son, Heechang & Oh, Juyoung & Yu, Taejong & Kim, Hyeonuk & Lim, Youngsub, 2024. "Advanced process design of subcooling re-liquefaction system considering storage pressure for a liquefied CO2 carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    12. van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2020. "How effective are forests in mitigating climate change?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Milão, Raquel de Freitas D. & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2021. "Second Law analysis of large-scale sugarcane-ethanol biorefineries with alternative distillation schemes: Bioenergy carbon capture scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Park, Gyunho & Jeong, Hayoung & Lee, Wonmi & Han, Jeong Woo & Chang, Duck Rye & Kwon, Yongchai, 2024. "Scaled-up aqueous redox flow battery using anthraquinone negalyte and vanadium posilyte with inorganic additive," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    15. Zhang, Zepeng & Wang, Qingzheng & Guan, Qingyu & Xiao, Xiong & Mi, Jimin & Lv, Songjian, 2023. "Research on the optimal allocation of agricultural water and soil resources in the Heihe River Basin based on SWAT and intelligent optimization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Stolarski, Mariusz Jerzy & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Akincza, Marta, 2020. "Bioenergy technologies and biomass potential vary in Northern European countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Mandley, S.J. & Daioglou, V. & Junginger, H.M. & van Vuuren, D.P. & Wicke, B., 2020. "EU bioenergy development to 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Muhammad Hammad Rasool & Maqsood Ahmad & Muhammad Ayoub, 2023. "Selecting Geological Formations for CO 2 Storage: A Comparative Rating System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, April.
    19. Zhao, Yuejun & Fan, Guangjuan & Song, Kaoping & Li, Yilin & Chen, Hao & Sun, He, 2021. "The experimental research for reducing the minimum miscibility pressure of carbon dioxide miscible flooding," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Brigagão, George Victor & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A zero-emission sustainable landfill-gas-to-wire oxyfuel process: Bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baker, J.S. & Wade, C.M. & Sohngen, B.L. & Ohrel, S. & Fawcett, A.A., 2019. "Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-401.
    2. Kallio, A.M.I. & Salminen, O. & Sievänen, R., 2013. "Sequester or substitute—Consequences of increased production of wood based energy on the carbon balance in Finland," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 402-415.
    3. Ekholm, Tommi & Karvosenoja, Niko & Tissari, Jarkko & Sokka, Laura & Kupiainen, Kaarle & Sippula, Olli & Savolahti, Mikko & Jokiniemi, Jorma & Savolainen, Ilkka, 2014. "A multi-criteria analysis of climate, health and acidification impacts due to greenhouse gases and air pollution—The case of household-level heating technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 499-509.
    4. Xin Zhao & Bryan K. Mignone & Marshall A. Wise & Haewon C. McJeon, 2024. "Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Riikka Siljander & Tommi Ekholm, 2018. "Integrated scenario modelling of energy, greenhouse gas emissions and forestry," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 783-802, June.
    6. Oppon, Eunice & Richter, Justin S. & Koh, S.C. Lenny & Nabayiga, Hellen, 2023. "Macro-level economic and environmental sustainability of negative emission technologies; Case study of crushed silicate production for enhanced weathering," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    7. Wildauer, Rafael & Leitch, Stuart & Kapeller, Jakob, 2020. "How to boost the European Green Deal's scale and ambition," ifso expertise 8, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    8. Sven Teske & Thomas Pregger & Sonja Simon & Tobias Naegler & Johannes Pagenkopf & Özcan Deniz & Bent van den Adel & Kate Dooley & Malte Meinshausen, 2021. "It Is Still Possible to Achieve the Paris Climate Agreement: Regional, Sectoral, and Land-Use Pathways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Wiraditma Prananta & Ida Kubiszewski, 2021. "Assessment of Indonesia’s Future Renewable Energy Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Biofuel Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Pettersson, Karin & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Athanassiadis, Dimitris & Lundmark, Robert & Ehn, Christian & Lundgren, Joakim & Berglin, Niklas, 2015. "Integration of next-generation biofuel production in the Swedish forest industry – A geographically explicit approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 317-332.
    12. Johanna Olofsson, 2021. "Time-Dependent Climate Impact of Utilizing Residual Biomass for Biofuels—The Combined Influence of Modelling Choices and Climate Impact Metrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Galán-Martín, Ángel & Contreras, María del Mar & Romero, Inmaculada & Ruiz, Encarnación & Bueno-Rodríguez, Salvador & Eliche-Quesada, Dolores & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio, 2022. "The potential role of olive groves to deliver carbon dioxide removal in a carbon-neutral Europe: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    14. Charles Breton & Pierre Blanchet & Ben Amor & Robert Beauregard & Wen-Shao Chang, 2018. "Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Schneider, Julia M. & Zabel, Florian & Schünemann, Franziska & Delzeit, Ruth & Mauser, Wolfram, 2022. "Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 253265, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Mellor, P. & Lord, R.A. & João, E. & Thomas, R. & Hursthouse, A., 2021. "Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Vassilis Stavrakas & Nikos Kleanthis & Alexandros Flamos, 2020. "An Ex-Post Assessment of RES-E Support in Greece by Investigating the Monetary Flows and the Causal Relationships in the Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-29, September.
    18. Haro, Pedro & Aracil, Cristina & Vidal-Barrero, Fernando & Ollero, Pedro, 2015. "Rewarding of extra-avoided GHG emissions in thermochemical biorefineries incorporating Bio-CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 255-266.
    19. de Souza, Lorena Mendes & Mendes, Pietro A.S. & Aranda, Donato A.G., 2020. "Oleaginous feedstocks for hydro-processed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) biojet production in southeastern Brazil: A multi-criteria decision analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1339-1351.
    20. Milão, Raquel de Freitas D. & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2021. "Second Law analysis of large-scale sugarcane-ethanol biorefineries with alternative distillation schemes: Bioenergy carbon capture scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:115:y:2019:i:c:s1364032119306161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.