IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v62y2014icp331-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meteorologically defined limits to reduction in the variability of outputs from a coupled wind farm system in the Central US

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Junling
  • Lu, Xi
  • McElroy, Michael B.

Abstract

Studies suggest that onshore wind resources in the contiguous US could readily accommodate present and anticipated future US demand for electricity. The problem with the output from a single wind farm located in any particular region is that it is variable on time scales ranging from minutes to days posing difficulties for incorporating relevant outputs into an integrated power system. The high frequency (shorter than once per day) variability of contributions from individual wind farms is determined mainly by locally generated small scale boundary layer. The low frequency variability (longer than once per day) is associated with the passage of transient waves in the atmosphere with a characteristic time scale of several days. Using 5 years of assimilated wind data, we show that the high frequency variability of wind-generated power can be significantly reduced by coupling outputs from 5 to 10 wind farms distributed uniformly over a ten state region of the Central US in this study. More than 95% of the remaining variability of the coupled system is concentrated at time scales longer than a day, allowing operators to take advantage of multi-day weather forecasts in scheduling projected contributions from wind.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Junling & Lu, Xi & McElroy, Michael B., 2014. "Meteorologically defined limits to reduction in the variability of outputs from a coupled wind farm system in the Central US," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 331-340.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:62:y:2014:i:c:p:331-340
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148113003674
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katzenstein, Warren & Fertig, Emily & Apt, Jay, 2010. "The variability of interconnected wind plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4400-4410, August.
    2. Hart, Elaine K. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2011. "A Monte Carlo approach to generator portfolio planning and carbon emissions assessments of systems with large penetrations of variable renewables," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2278-2286.
    3. Oswald, James & Raine, Mike & Ashraf-Ball, Hezlin, 2008. "Will British weather provide reliable electricity?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3202-3215, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahriari, Mehdi & Blumsack, Seth, 2017. "Scaling of wind energy variability over space and time," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 572-585.
    2. Rose, Stephen & Apt, Jay, 2015. "What can reanalysis data tell us about wind power?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 963-969.
    3. Dey, Subhashish & Sreenivasulu, Anduri & Veerendra, G.T.N. & Rao, K. Venkateswara & Babu, P.S.S. Anjaneya, 2022. "Renewable energy present status and future potentials in India: An overview," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    4. Shahriari, Mehdi & Blumsack, Seth, 2018. "The capacity value of optimal wind and solar portfolios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 992-1005.
    5. Rose, Stephen & Apt, Jay, 2016. "Quantifying sources of uncertainty in reanalysis derived wind speed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 157-165.
    6. Huang, Junling & McElroy, Michael B., 2015. "A 32-year perspective on the origin of wind energy in a warming climate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 482-492.
    7. Richard Schmalensee, 2016. "The Performance of U.S. Wind and Solar Generators," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    8. Qiwei Li & Jiaxuan Zhang & Jiahui Chen & Xi Lu, 2019. "Reflection on opportunities for high penetration of renewable energy in China," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), May.
    9. Rezaee Jordehi, Ahmad, 2016. "Allocation of distributed generation units in electric power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 893-905.
    10. Han, Chanok & Vinel, Alexander, 2022. "Reducing forecasting error by optimally pooling wind energy generation sources through portfolio optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Yongqian Liu & Yanhui Qiao & Shuang Han & Yanping Xu & Tianxiang Geng & Tiandong Ma, 2021. "Quantitative Evaluation Methods of Cluster Wind Power Output Volatility and Source-Load Timing Matching in Regional Power Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Handschy, Mark A. & Rose, Stephen & Apt, Jay, 2017. "Is it always windy somewhere? Occurrence of low-wind-power events over large areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1124-1130.
    13. McPherson, Madeleine & Karney, Bryan, 2017. "A scenario based approach to designing electricity grids with high variable renewable energy penetrations in Ontario, Canada: Development and application of the SILVER model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 185-196.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lenzen, Manfred & McBain, Bonnie & Trainer, Ted & Jütte, Silke & Rey-Lescure, Olivier & Huang, Jing, 2016. "Simulating low-carbon electricity supply for Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 553-564.
    2. Diesendorf, Mark & Elliston, Ben, 2018. "The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: A response to critics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 318-330.
    3. Trainer, Ted, 2013. "Limits to solar thermal energy set by intermittency and low DNI: Implications from meteorological data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 910-917.
    4. Yousefzadeh, Moslem & Lenzen, Manfred, 2019. "Performance of concentrating solar power plants in a whole-of-grid context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Engeland, Kolbjørn & Borga, Marco & Creutin, Jean-Dominique & François, Baptiste & Ramos, Maria-Helena & Vidal, Jean-Philippe, 2017. "Space-time variability of climate variables and intermittent renewable electricity production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 600-617.
    6. Gorg Abdelmassih & Mohammed Al-Numay & Abdelali El Aroudi, 2021. "Map Optimization Fuzzy Logic Framework in Wind Turbine Site Selection with Application to the USA Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Iniyan, S. & Amutha, D., 2014. "A review of technical issues on the development of wind farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 619-641.
    8. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Hunt, C., 2012. "The role of conventional generation in managing variability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 253-261.
    9. Pablo González-Inostroza & Claudia Rahmann & Ricardo Álvarez & Jannik Haas & Wolfgang Nowak & Christian Rehtanz, 2021. "The Role of Fast Frequency Response of Energy Storage Systems and Renewables for Ensuring Frequency Stability in Future Low-Inertia Power Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Boccard, Nicolas, 2010. "Economic properties of wind power: A European assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3232-3244, July.
    11. Frew, Bethany A. & Becker, Sarah & Dvorak, Michael J. & Andresen, Gorm B. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 65-78.
    12. Grothe, Oliver & Müsgens, Felix, 2013. "The influence of spatial effects on wind power revenues under direct marketing rules," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 237-247.
    13. Keck, Felix & Jütte, Silke & Lenzen, Manfred & Li, Mengyu, 2022. "Assessment of two optimisation methods for renewable energy capacity expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    14. Sayegh, Hasan & Leconte, Antoine & Fraisse, Gilles & Wurtz, Etienne & Rouchier, Simon, 2022. "Computational time reduction using detailed building models with Typical Short Sequences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Álvarez-García, Francisco J. & Fresno-Schmolk, Gonzalo & OrtizBevia, María J. & Cabos, William & RuizdeElvira, Antonio, 2020. "Reduction of aggregate wind power variability using Empirical Orthogonal Teleconnections: An application in the Iberian Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-161.
    16. Nicolas Tobin & Adam Lavely & Sven Schmitz & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Correlations in the Power Output of Wind Farms: On the Impact of Atmospheric Stability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Santos-Alamillos, F.J. & Pozo-Vázquez, D. & Ruiz-Arias, J.A. & Lara-Fanego, V. & Tovar-Pescador, J., 2014. "A methodology for evaluating the spatial variability of wind energy resources: Application to assess the potential contribution of wind energy to baseload power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 147-156.
    18. Narbel, Patrick A., 2014. "Rethinking how to support intermittent renewables," Discussion Papers 2014/17, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    19. Trainer, Ted, 2013. "Can Europe run on renewable energy? A negative case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 845-850.
    20. Kocaman, Ayse Selin & Ozyoruk, Emin & Taneja, Shantanu & Modi, Vijay, 2020. "A stochastic framework to evaluate the impact of agricultural load flexibility on the sizing of renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1067-1078.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:62:y:2014:i:c:p:331-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.