IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v113y2017icp1077-1085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separate production of hydrogen and methane from biodiesel wastewater with added glycerin by two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBR)

Author

Listed:
  • Tangkathitipong, Pranee
  • Intanoo, Patcharee
  • Butpan, Janyawan
  • Chavadej, Sumaeth

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate hydrogen and methane production from biodiesel wastewater with added glycerin by using two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBR) under 37 °C with a recycle ratio of the effluent from the methane ASBR unit-to-the feed flow rate of 1:1. Hydrogen ASBR unit was operated at a constant pH of 5.5 whereas the pH of methane ASBR unit was not controlled. Glycerin was added into biodiesel wastewater having 2330 mg/l COD to obtain a constant feed chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 45,000 m/l. At optimum COD loading rate 11.3 kg/m3d (based on feed COD load and methane ASBR volume), the system provided the highest overall hydrogen and methane production performance (75.15 ml H2/g glycerin removed) which was consistent with the maximum overall COD removal of 76.7% and the highest overall glycerin uptake of 90%. Most of added glycerin was converted to gaseous products with small amounts of organic acids and 1,3 propanediol. The low volumetric ratio of hydrogen ASBR unit-to-methane ASBR unit of 1:6 resulted in low hydrogen yields with high methane yields. Process performance of the two-stage ASBR system was limited by the inhibition of total volatile organic acids produced in both bioreactors.

Suggested Citation

  • Tangkathitipong, Pranee & Intanoo, Patcharee & Butpan, Janyawan & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2017. "Separate production of hydrogen and methane from biodiesel wastewater with added glycerin by two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBR)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1077-1085.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:113:y:2017:i:c:p:1077-1085
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014811730561X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayoub, Muhammad & Abdullah, Ahmad Zuhairi, 2012. "Critical review on the current scenario and significance of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel industry towards more sustainable renewable energy industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2671-2686.
    2. Abbasi, Tasneem & Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, S.A., 2012. "Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation—An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3228-3242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura, Mitrea & Monica, Trif & Dan-Cristian, Vodnar, 2020. "The effect of crude glycerol impurities on 1,3-propanediol biosynthesis by Klebsiella pneumoniae DSMZ 2026," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1418-1427.
    2. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    3. Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Jantaruksa, Todsapon & Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Pornmai, Krittiya & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2021. "Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Che Man Hasfalina & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2018. "Effect of Organic Loading Rate on Anaerobic Digestion Performance of Mesophilic (UASB) Reactor Using Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater as Substrate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    2. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    3. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Dey, Subhashish & Sreenivasulu, Anduri & Veerendra, G.T.N. & Rao, K. Venkateswara & Babu, P.S.S. Anjaneya, 2022. "Renewable energy present status and future potentials in India: An overview," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    5. Erna Astuti & Supranto Supranto & Rochmadi Rochmadi & Agus Prasetya & Krister Strom & Bengt Andersson, 2014. "Kinetic Modeling of Nitration of Glycerol," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 1-78, April.
    6. Coultry, James & Walsh, Eilín & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Energy and economic implications of anaerobic digestion pasteurisation regulations in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-128.
    7. Kamel, Salah & El-Sattar, Hoda Abd & Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco, 2018. "Bioenergy potential from agriculture residues for energy generation in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 28-37.
    8. Da Seul Kong & Eun Joo Park & Sakuntala Mutyala & Minsoo Kim & Yunchul Cho & Sang Eun Oh & Changman Kim & Jung Rae Kim, 2021. "Bioconversion of Crude Glycerol into 1,3-Propanediol(1,3-PDO) with Bioelectrochemical System and Zero-Valent Iron Using Klebsiella pneumoniae L17," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-10, October.
    9. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Okey Francis Obi & Ralf Pecenka & Michael J. Clifford, 2022. "A Review of Biomass Briquette Binders and Quality Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul & Aghili, Nasim, 2013. "The scenario of greenhouse gases reduction in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 400-409.
    12. Severo, Ihana Aguiar & Siqueira, Stefania Fortes & Deprá, Mariany Costa & Maroneze, Mariana Manzoni & Zepka, Leila Queiroz & Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo, 2019. "Biodiesel facilities: What can we address to make biorefineries commercially competitive?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 686-705.
    13. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. He, Quan (Sophia) & McNutt, Josiah & Yang, Jie, 2017. "Utilization of the residual glycerol from biodiesel production for renewable energy generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-76.
    15. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech, 2012. "Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4890-4900.
    16. Okoye, P.U. & Hameed, B.H., 2016. "Review on recent progress in catalytic carboxylation and acetylation of glycerol as a byproduct of biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 558-574.
    17. Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2013. "Energy recovery from wastewaters with high-rate anaerobic digesters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 704-741.
    18. Kong, Pei San & Aroua, Mohamed Kheireddine & Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan, 2016. "Conversion of crude and pure glycerol into derivatives: A feasibility evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 533-555.
    19. Mavrotas, George & Gakis, Nikos & Skoulaxinou, Sotiria & Katsouros, Vassilis & Georgopoulou, Elena, 2015. "Municipal solid waste management and energy production: Consideration of external cost through multi-objective optimization and its effect on waste-to-energy solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1205-1222.
    20. Silva, Wellington Costa & Castro, Maria Priscila Pessanha & Perez, Victor Haber & Machado, Francisco A. & Mota, Leonardo & Sthel, Marcelo Silva, 2016. "Thermal degradation of ethanolic biodiesel: Physicochemical and thermal properties evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1093-1099.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:113:y:2017:i:c:p:1077-1085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.