IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v227y2021ics0360544221007611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater

Author

Listed:
  • Seneesrisakul, Kessara
  • Jantaruksa, Todsapon
  • Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya
  • Pornmai, Krittiya
  • Rangsunvigit, Pramoch
  • Chavadej, Sumaeth

Abstract

A new three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) was developed to enhance methane productivity and energy yield by varying the reactor volumetric and recycle ratios. The pH of the first reactor (R1) was maintained at 5.5, whereas that of the others (R2/R3) was not controlled. The effluent from R3 was recirculated to R1 to amplify the alkalinity and lessen the NaOH quantity for pH regulation. The 3S-ASBR was continually operated to attain a steady state at a moderate COD loading rate (10 kg/m3d) with different reactor volumetric ratios under 37 °C, a fixed total liquid volume of 30 L and a constant recycle ratio of unity. A R1:R2:R3 volumetric ratio of 1:1.5:5 gave the highest COD reduction (90%) and yielded 343 mL CH4/g COD applied with an overall energy extraction efficiency of up to 66%. This volumetric ratio corresponded well to the generation time ratio of the microbes involved in the hydrolysis/acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis steps which can be applied to scale up both 3S-ASBR and three-step/stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (3S-UASB) systems. The low pH level (5.5) in R1 was responsible for maintaining adequate amounts of all micronutrients in the system, causing both high microbial concentrations and activities. This was because the lower the solution pH, the higher the fraction of produced H2S to be in the gaseous phase, causing the lower the amounts of micronutrients to be precipitated chemically.

Suggested Citation

  • Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Jantaruksa, Todsapon & Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Pornmai, Krittiya & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2021. "Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:227:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221007611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221007611
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tangkathitipong, Pranee & Intanoo, Patcharee & Butpan, Janyawan & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2017. "Separate production of hydrogen and methane from biodiesel wastewater with added glycerin by two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBR)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1077-1085.
    2. Anoop Singh & Surajbhan Sevda & Ibrahim M. Abu Reesh & Karolien Vanbroekhoven & Dheeraj Rathore & Deepak Pant, 2015. "Biohydrogen Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Technology and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    4. Voelklein, M.A. & O' Shea, R. & Jacob, A. & Murphy, J.D., 2017. "Role of trace elements in single and two-stage digestion of food waste at high organic loading rates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 185-192.
    5. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Merlin Christy, P. & Gopinath, L.R. & Divya, D., 2014. "A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 167-173.
    7. Achiraya Jiraprasertwong & Kornpong Vichaitanapat & Malinee Leethochawalit & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "Three-Stage Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor (ASBR) for Maximum Methane Production: Effects of COD Loading Rate and Reactor Volumetric Ratio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Bożym, Marta & Florczak, Iwona & Zdanowska, Paulina & Wojdalski, Janusz & Klimkiewicz, Marek, 2015. "An analysis of metal concentrations in food wastes for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 467-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Ghofrani-Isfahani, Parisa & Baniamerian, Hamed & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Kasama, Takeshi & Shahrokhi, Mohammad & Vossoughi, Manouchehr & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Effect of metal oxide based TiO2 nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion process of lignocellulosic substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Achiraya Jiraprasertwong & Kornpong Vichaitanapat & Malinee Leethochawalit & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "Three-Stage Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor (ASBR) for Maximum Methane Production: Effects of COD Loading Rate and Reactor Volumetric Ratio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Shanshan Zhao & Mingsen Qin & Xia Yang & Wenke Bai & Yunfeng Yao & Junqiang Wang, 2023. "Freeze–Thaw Cycles Have More of an Effect on Greenhouse Gas Fluxes than Soil Water Content on the Eastern Edge of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Liu, Jianfeng & Tang, Zhengkang & Wang, Changmei & Wu, Kai & Song, Yuanlin & Wang, Xingping & Zhang, Zhiwen & Zhao, Xingling & Yang, Bin & Piao, Mingguo & Yin, Fang & Zhang, Wudi, 2021. "Novel technique for sustainable utilisation of water hyacinth using EGSB and MCSTR: Control overgrowth, energy recovery, and microbial metabolic mechanism," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1701-1710.
    6. Tang, Shuai & Wang, Zixin & Lu, Haifeng & Si, Buchun & Wang, Chaoyuan & Jiang, Weizhong, 2023. "Design of stage-separated anaerobic digestion: Principles, applications, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Huayong Zhang & Di An & Yudong Cao & Yonglan Tian & Jinxian He, 2021. "Modeling the Methane Production Kinetics of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Wastes Using Sigmoidal Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Tonanzi, B. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A. & Montecchio, D. & Pagliaccia, P. & Rossetti, S. & Braguglia, C.M., 2021. "Elucidating the key factors in semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of urban biowaste: The crucial role of sludge addition in process stability, microbial community enrichment and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 272-284.
    9. Asma Sattar & Chaudhry Arslan & Changying Ji & Sumiyya Sattar & Irshad Ali Mari & Haroon Rashid & Fariha Ilyas, 2016. "Comparing the Bio-Hydrogen Production Potential of Pretreated Rice Straw Co-Digested with Seeded Sludge Using an Anaerobic Bioreactor under Mesophilic Thermophilic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Sim, Xue Yan & Tan, Jian Ping & He, Ning & Yeap, Swee Keong & Hui, Yew Woh & Luthfi, Abdullah Amru Indera & Manaf, Shareena Fairuz Abdul & Bukhari, Nurul Adela & Jamali, Nur Syakina, 2023. "Unraveling the effect of redox potential on dark fermentative hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Li, Jianzheng & Wang, Xin & Fan, Yiyang & Chen, Qiyi & Meng, Jia, 2024. "Biosynthesis of NPs CuS/Cu2S and self-assembly with C. beijerinckii for improving lignocellulosic butanol production in staged butyrate-butanol fermentation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. A. Sinan Akturk & Goksel N. Demirer, 2020. "Improved Food Waste Stabilization and Valorization by Anaerobic Digestion Through Supplementation of Conductive Materials and Trace Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    13. Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2022. "Recent Advances and Perspectives of Nanotechnology in Anaerobic Digestion: A New Paradigm towards Sludge Biodegradability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Anna Nowicka & Magda Dudek, 2024. "Optimisation of Biogas Production in the Co-Digestion of Pre-Hydrodynamically Cavitated Aerobic Granular Sludge with Waste Fats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Michele Moretti & Enrico Bocci, 2018. "Life Cycle Performance of Hydrogen Production via Agro-Industrial Residue Gasification—A Small Scale Power Plant Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    17. Cristiane Romio & Michael Vedel Wegener Kofoed & Henrik Bjarne Møller, 2021. "Digestate Post-Treatment Strategies for Additional Biogas Recovery: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    18. Chibueze G. Achi & Amro Hassanein & Stephanie Lansing, 2020. "Enhanced Biogas Production of Cassava Wastewater Using Zeolite and Biochar Additives and Manure Co-Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Kolbl, Sabina & Forte-Tavčer, Petra & Stres, Blaž, 2017. "Potential for valorization of dehydrated paper pulp sludge for biogas production: Addition of selected hydrolytic enzymes in semi-continuous anaerobic digestion assays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 326-334.
    20. Mamata Singhvi & Smita Zinjarde & Beom-Soo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Strategies for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Materials into Biohydrogen: Challenges and Solutions toward Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:227:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221007611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.