IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v252y2024ics0951832024004964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imperfect maintenance modelling and estimation for interval-censored data

Author

Listed:
  • Cousino, Théo
  • Brissaud, Florent
  • Doyen, Laurent
  • Gaudoin, Olivier
  • Marle, Leïla

Abstract

The paper proposes a new maintenance model for a repairable system. The system is inspected at deterministic times. If a failure occurs between two successive inspections, a minimal repair is performed. At inspection times, two types of maintenance actions can be performed. The first originality of the paper is to consider that the choice between these two types of maintenance depends on the fact that there has been a failure or not since the previous inspection. If no failure has occurred since the last inspection, the maintenance, simply denoted PM, corresponds to a basic preventive maintenance action, whose effect is planned by the initial maintenance plan. If at least one failure has occurred since the last inspection, the maintenance, denoted PCM, includes both the preventive action planned by the initial maintenance plan, and a specific corrective action which aims to fix the defects that have happened since the last inspection. Both types of maintenances are assumed to be imperfect, of the ARA (Arithmetic Reduction of Age) type, with different parameters. Moreover, the paper derives several statistical inference methods for this model. The usual case of complete data is first considered. The second originality of the paper is to analyse interval-censored data in this imperfect maintenance framework. This situation holds when failure times are not observed, and the only information is the fact that failures have occurred or not between two inspections. The quality of the proposed methods is assessed on simulated data. Finally, a real dataset from a gas transmission system operator is provided and analysed with the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Cousino, Théo & Brissaud, Florent & Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier & Marle, Leïla, 2024. "Imperfect maintenance modelling and estimation for interval-censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024004964
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    2. Ruiwen Zhou & Huiqiong Li & Jianguo Sun & Niansheng Tang, 2022. "A new approach to estimation of the proportional hazards model based on interval-censored data with missing covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 335-355, July.
    3. MERCIER, Sophie & CASTRO, I.T., 2019. "Stochastic comparisons of imperfect maintenance models for a gamma deteriorating system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 237-248.
    4. Wang, Yifei & Xie, Mingjiang & Su, Chun, 2024. "Multi-objective maintenance strategy for corroded pipelines considering the correlation of different failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Maria Luíza Guerra de Toledo & Marta A. Freitas & Enrico A. Colosimo & Gustavo L. Gilardoni, 2016. "Optimal periodic maintenance policy under imperfect repair: A case study on the engines of off-road vehicles," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 747-758, August.
    6. Toledo, Maria Luíza Guerra de & Freitas, Marta A. & Colosimo, Enrico A. & Gilardoni, Gustavo L., 2015. "ARA and ARI imperfect repair models: Estimation, goodness-of-fit and reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-115.
    7. Brenière, Léa & Doyen, Laurent & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Virtual age models with time-dependent covariates: A framework for simulation, parametric inference and quality of estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Doyen, L., 2014. "Semi-parametric estimation of Brown–Proschan preventive maintenance effects and intrinsic wear-out," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 206-222.
    9. Beutner, Eric, 2023. "A review of effective age models and associated non- and semiparametric methods," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 105-119.
    10. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan, 2011. "Trend analysis of the power law process using Expectation–Maximization algorithm for data censored by inspection intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1340-1348.
    11. Li, Dongmin & Hu, Qingpei & Wang, Lujia & Yu, Dan, 2019. "Statistical inference for Mt/G/Infinity queueing systems under incomplete observations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 882-901.
    12. Guo, Haitao & Watson, Simon & Tavner, Peter & Xiang, Jiangping, 2009. "Reliability analysis for wind turbines with incomplete failure data collected from after the date of initial installation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1057-1063.
    13. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Grall, A., 2021. "Replacement and imperfect repair of deteriorating system: Study of a CBM policy and impact of repair efficiency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Dijoux, Yann & Fouladirad, Mitra & Nguyen, Dinh Tuan, 2016. "Statistical inference for imperfect maintenance models with missing data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 84-96.
    15. Hu, Wei & Westerlund, Per & Hilber, Patrik & Chen, Chuanhai & Yang, Zhaojun, 2022. "A general model, estimation, and procedure for modeling recurrent failure process of high-voltage circuit breakers considering multivariate impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    16. Dehghan Shoorkand, Hassan & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hajji, Adnène, 2024. "A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for joint optimization of production and imperfect predictive maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Yu, Jun-Wu & Tian, Guo-Liang & Tang, Man-Lai, 2008. "Statistical inference and prediction for the Weibull process with incomplete observations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1587-1603, January.
    18. Brissaud, Florent, 2017. "Using field feedback to estimate failure rates of safety-related systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 206-213.
    19. Ait Mokhtar, El Hassene & Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance modeling and assessment of repairable multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Cheng, Wanqing & Zhao, Xiujie, 2023. "Maintenance optimization for dependent two-component degrading systems subject to imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    21. Zhou, Yu & Kou, Gang & Xiao, Hui & Peng, Yi & Alsaadi, Fawaz E., 2020. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with failure intensity reduction with an application to urban buses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    22. Syamsundar, A. & Naikan, V.N.A. & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Extended Arithmetic Reduction of Age Models for the Failure Process of a Repairable System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    23. Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier & Syamsundar, Annamraju, 2017. "On geometric reduction of age or intensity models for imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 40-52.
    24. Remy, Emmanuel & Corset, Franck & Despréaux, Stéphane & Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier, 2013. "An example of integrated approach to technical and economic optimization of maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 8-19.
    25. Peng, Yizhen & Wang, Yu & Zi, YanYang & Tsui, Kwok-Leung & Zhang, Chuhua, 2017. "Dynamic reliability assessment and prediction for repairable systems with interval-censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 301-309.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ait Mokhtar, El Hassene & Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance modeling and assessment of repairable multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Ji, Ziguang & Chen, Yi & Ma, Xiaobing & Cai, Yikun & Yang, Li, 2024. "Hierarchical condition-based maintenance planning for corrosion process considering natural environmental impact," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Beutner, Eric, 2023. "A review of effective age models and associated non- and semiparametric methods," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 105-119.
    4. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2022. "Reducing degradation and age of items in imperfect repair modeling," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 1058-1081, December.
    5. Peng, Yizhen & Wang, Yu & Zi, YanYang & Tsui, Kwok-Leung & Zhang, Chuhua, 2017. "Dynamic reliability assessment and prediction for repairable systems with interval-censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 301-309.
    6. Syamsundar, A. & Naikan, V.N.A. & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Extended Arithmetic Reduction of Age Models for the Failure Process of a Repairable System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Brenière, Léa & Doyen, Laurent & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Virtual age models with time-dependent covariates: A framework for simulation, parametric inference and quality of estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2021. "On degradation-based imperfect repair and induced generalized renewal processes," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(4), pages 1026-1045, December.
    9. Toledo, Maria Luíza Guerra de & Freitas, Marta A. & Colosimo, Enrico A. & Gilardoni, Gustavo L., 2015. "ARA and ARI imperfect repair models: Estimation, goodness-of-fit and reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-115.
    10. Nafisah, Ibrahim & Shrahili, Mansour & Alotaibi, Naif & Scarf, Phil, 2019. "Virtual series-system models of imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 604-613.
    11. Louzada, Francisco & Tomazella, Vera L.D. & Gonzatto, Oilson A. & Bochio, Gustavo & Milani, Eder A. & Ferreira, Paulo H. & Ramos, Pedro L., 2022. "Reliability assessment of repairable systems with series–parallel structure subjected to hierarchical competing risks under minimal repair regime," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Xin-Yu Tian & Xincheng Shi & Cheng Peng & Xiao-Jian Yi, 2021. "A Reliability Growth Process Model with Time-Varying Covariates and Its Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Hu, Wei & Yang, Zhaojun & Chen, Chuanhai & Wu, Yue & Xie, Qunya, 2021. "A Weibull-based recurrent regression model for repairable systems considering double effects of operation and maintenance: A case study of machine tools," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Hu, Wei & Westerlund, Per & Hilber, Patrik & Chen, Chuanhai & Yang, Zhaojun, 2022. "A general model, estimation, and procedure for modeling recurrent failure process of high-voltage circuit breakers considering multivariate impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Yevkin, Alexander & Krivtsov, Vasiliy, 2020. "A generalized model for recurrent failures prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    16. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    17. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Shemehsavar, S. & Grall, A., 2024. "An intelligent maintenance policy for a latent degradation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Brito, Éder S. & Tomazella, Vera L.D. & Ferreira, Paulo H., 2022. "Statistical modeling and reliability analysis of multiple repairable systems with dependent failure times under perfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Shang, Lijun & Liu, Baoliang & Qiu, Qingan & Yang, Li & Du, Yongjun, 2023. "Designing warranty and maintenance policies for products subject to random working cycles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Zantek, Paul F. & Hanson, Timothy & Damien, Paul & Popova, Elmira, 2015. "A decision dependent stochastic process model for repairable systems with applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 73-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.