IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v188y2019icp604-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual series-system models of imperfect repair

Author

Listed:
  • Nafisah, Ibrahim
  • Shrahili, Mansour
  • Alotaibi, Naif
  • Scarf, Phil

Abstract

Novel models of imperfect repair are fitted to classic reliability datasets. The models suppose that a virtual system comprises a component and a remainder in series. On failure of the component, the component is renewed, and on failure of the remainder, the component is renewed and the remainder is minimally repaired. It follows that the repair process is a counting process that is the superposition of a renewal process and a Poisson process. The repair effect, that is, the extent to the system is repaired by renewal of the component, depends on the relative intensities of the superposed processes. The repair effect may be negative, when the intensity of the part that is a renewal process is a decreasing function. Other special cases of the model exist (renewal process, Poisson process, superposed renewal process and homogeneous Poisson process). Model fit is important because the nature of the model and corresponding parameter values determine the effectiveness of maintenance, which we also consider. A cost-minimising repair policy may be determined provided the cost of preventive-repair is less than the cost of corrective-repair and the repairable part is ageing. If the remainder is ageing, then policy needs to be adapted as it ages.

Suggested Citation

  • Nafisah, Ibrahim & Shrahili, Mansour & Alotaibi, Naif & Scarf, Phil, 2019. "Virtual series-system models of imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 604-613.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:604-613
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018312778
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2017. "Two new stochastic models of the failure process of a series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 763-772.
    2. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    3. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    4. Scarf, Philip A., 1997. "On the application of mathematical models in maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 493-506, June.
    5. Smith, M. A. J. & Dekker, R., 1997. "Preventive maintenance in a 1 out of n system: The uptime, downtime and costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 565-583, June.
    6. Doyen, L., 2014. "Semi-parametric estimation of Brown–Proschan preventive maintenance effects and intrinsic wear-out," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 206-222.
    7. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    8. Kallen, M.J., 2011. "Modelling imperfect maintenance and the reliability of complex systems using superposed renewal processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 636-641.
    9. Zhang, Wenjuan & Wang, Wenbin, 2014. "Cost modelling in maintenance strategy optimisation for infrastructure assets with limited data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 33-41.
    10. Caroni, C., 2010. "“Failure limited†data and TTT-based trend tests in multiple repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 704-706.
    11. Scarf, Philip A. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2012. "Modelling quality in replacement and inspection maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 372-381.
    12. Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier & Syamsundar, Annamraju, 2017. "On geometric reduction of age or intensity models for imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 40-52.
    13. M I Desa & A H Christer, 2001. "Modelling in the absence of data: a case study of fleet maintenance in a developing country," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(3), pages 247-260, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Almeida, Marco Pollo & Paixão, Rafael S. & Ramos, Pedro L. & Tomazella, Vera & Louzada, Francisco & Ehlers, Ricardo S., 2020. "Bayesian non-parametric frailty model for dependent competing risks in a repairable systems framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Bodunrin Brown & Bin Liu & Stuart McIntyre & Matthew Revie, 2023. "Reliability evaluation of repairable systems considering component heterogeneity using frailty model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 654-670, August.
    3. Jiang, R., 2020. "A novel two-fold sectional approximation of renewal function and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Wenke Gao, 2020. "An extended geometric process and its application in replacement policy," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 88-103, February.
    5. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Ma, Yizhong, 2020. "Optimal maintenance policy considering imperfect repairs and non-constant probabilities of inspection errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip & Silva, André L.O., 2018. "Modelling inspection and replacement quality for a protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 145-153.
    2. Yevkin, Alexander & Krivtsov, Vasiliy, 2020. "A generalized model for recurrent failures prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio, 2022. "A study on the economic and environmental viability of second-hand items in maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    5. Wenke Gao, 2020. "An extended geometric process and its application in replacement policy," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 88-103, February.
    6. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    7. Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S., 2019. "Delay-time modelling of a critical system subject to random inspections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 772-782.
    8. Yang, Li & Ye, Zhi-sheng & Lee, Chi-Guhn & Yang, Su-fen & Peng, Rui, 2019. "A two-phase preventive maintenance policy considering imperfect repair and postponed replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 966-977.
    9. Brenière, Léa & Doyen, Laurent & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Virtual age models with time-dependent covariates: A framework for simulation, parametric inference and quality of estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    11. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    12. Wu, Shaomin, 2019. "A failure process model with the exponential smoothing of intensity functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 502-513.
    13. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2017. "Two new stochastic models of the failure process of a series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 763-772.
    14. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    15. Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S. & Scarf, P.A., 2018. "A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 911-919.
    16. Cocozza-Thivent, Christiane, 2007. "MUT of a one out of two system with preventive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1203-1229, November.
    17. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Ren, Junru & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "A novel delay time modelling method for incorporating reuse actions in three-state single-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Syamsundar, A. & Naikan, V.N.A. & Wu, Shaomin, 2020. "Alternative scales in reliability models for a repairable system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Zantek, Paul F. & Hanson, Timothy & Damien, Paul & Popova, Elmira, 2015. "A decision dependent stochastic process model for repairable systems with applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 73-80.
    20. Percy, David F., 2002. "Bayesian enhanced strategic decision making for reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 133-145, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:604-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.