IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics0951832024003776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multisource information fusion for real-time prediction and multiobjective optimization of large-diameter slurry shield attitude

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Xianguo
  • Wang, Jingyi
  • Feng, Zongbao
  • Chen, Hongyu
  • Li, Tiejun
  • Liu, Yang

Abstract

Abnormal large-diameter slurry shield attitudes (SA) lead to safety and quality problems in shield construction. To achieve intelligent prediction and optimization of the large-diameter slurry SA, a combination of Bayesian optimization categorical boosting (BO-CatBoost) and a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEAD) is proposed for the prediction and optimization of the tunnel large-diameter slurry SA, as well as the corresponding digital twin framework. Using the Yangtze River large-diameter slurry shield project in Wuhan as an example, data were collected for three soil conditions, namely, silty fine sand, angular gravelly soils and chalky clays, and gravelly soil. The results show that: (1) The R2 values of the three predicted types of soils are all above 0.9, the RMSE values are less than 1.2, and the MAE values are less than 0.9. (2) Based on the results of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the propulsive thrust had the greatest influence on the large-diameter slurry SA. (3) The large-diameter slurry SA optimization improves when the number of adjusted construction parameters increases, with a maximum optimization rate of 23.436%. In addition, a digital twin framework based on BO-CatBoost-MOEAD is proposed, which can effectively control large-diameter slurry SAs and improve overall project safety and quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Xianguo & Wang, Jingyi & Feng, Zongbao & Chen, Hongyu & Li, Tiejun & Liu, Yang, 2024. "Multisource information fusion for real-time prediction and multiobjective optimization of large-diameter slurry shield attitude," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003776
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024003776
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.