IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v244y2024ics0951832024000024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic reliability analysis of Aerial Building Machine under extreme wind loads using improved QBDC-based active learning

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jiaqi
  • Zhang, Limao
  • Yang, Hui
  • Liu, Huabei
  • Skibniewski, MirosÅ‚aw J.

Abstract

Aerial building machine (ABM) is a new comprehensive construction equipment used for the construction of high-rise buildings, and the research of its wind-induced response is essential for structural safety. However, the traditional reliability estimation for complex structures is generally computationally expensive. This study proposes a novel and time-saving active learning (AL) approach to predict the structural time-variant response and calculate the reliability under extreme wind loads based on improved Query-by-Dropout-Committee (QBDC), Deep Learning (DL) and Probability Density Evolution Method (PDEM). To establish an effective training set, the load sample pool from the turbulent wind field is constructed by the number theory method (NTM). Then a DL surrogate model, aimed to simulate the excitation-response relationship of the structure, is well-trained from data calculated by the Finite Element Method (FEM) under the workflow of the improved QBDC-based AL approach. Lastly, the structural responses predicted by the surrogate model are used to solve the Generalized Density Evolution Equation (GDEE) to obtain the Probability Density Function (PDF) of the structural response. The dynamic reliability can be gained using absorbing boundary condition. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, an ABM in China is taken as a case study. It is found that (1) The external trusses of the platform are weak positions under the horizontal wind loads. It is suggested to append the longitudinal (windward direction) trusses to reduce the local stress and deformation. (2) Under turbulent wind loads with the average speed of 40Â m/s, the maximum structural response of the ABM will exceed the threshold value and the reliability is 0.932. (3) The reliability calculation error derived by the proposed approach and the traditional PDEM is within 0.5Â % in this study, while the computational efficiency of the AL approach is 77.08Â % higher than that of the traditional PDEM. The novelty lies in the proposed active learning approach that can easily obtain the stochastic response and dynamic reliability of the ABM, where the analysis workflow not only has a low computational cost but also maintains a high calculation accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jiaqi & Zhang, Limao & Yang, Hui & Liu, Huabei & Skibniewski, MirosÅ‚aw J., 2024. "Dynamic reliability analysis of Aerial Building Machine under extreme wind loads using improved QBDC-based active learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000024
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.109927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024000024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.109927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Echard, B. & Gayton, N. & Lemaire, M. & Relun, N., 2013. "A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 232-240.
    2. Zhang, Yanping & Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yiliu & Jiang, Qiangqiang & Li, Wenchao & Feng, Qiang & Liu, Yonghong & Liu, Guijie, 2021. "Resilience assessment approach of mechanical structure combining finite element models and dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Fauriat, W. & Gayton, N., 2014. "AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 137-144.
    4. Bao, Yuequan & Xiang, Zhengliang & Li, Hui, 2021. "Adaptive subset searching-based deep neural network method for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Zuo, Ming J. & Zhou, Chengning, 2018. "A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 330-338.
    6. Lin, Penghui & Zhang, Limao & Tiong, Robert L.K., 2023. "Multi-objective robust optimization for enhanced safety in large-diameter tunnel construction with interactive and explainable AI," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Zhou, Tong & Peng, Yongbo, 2022. "Reliability analysis using adaptive Polynomial-Chaos Kriging and probability density evolution method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Yang, Xufeng & Liu, Yongshou & Mi, Caiying & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "System reliability analysis through active learning Kriging model with truncated candidate region," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 235-241.
    9. Zhang, Chi & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2022. "Simulation-free reliability analysis with active learning and Physics-Informed Neural Network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    2. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Wang, Dapeng & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming, 2020. "EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang & Xiao, Mi, 2020. "A composite-projection-outline-based approximation method for system reliability analysis with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Wang, Yanzhong & Xie, Bin & E, Shiyuan, 2022. "Adaptive relevance vector machine combined with Markov-chain-based importance sampling for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    6. Yuan, Kai & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Wang, Zhonglai & Shang, Kun, 2020. "System reliability analysis by combining structure function and active learning kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2021. "Adaptive Bayesian support vector regression model for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2020. "On confidence intervals for failure probability estimates in Kriging-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Li, Meng & Sadoughi, Mohammadkazem & Hu, Zhen & Hu, Chao, 2020. "A hybrid Gaussian process model for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Zhou, Yicheng & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yun, Wanying, 2020. "Active sparse polynomial chaos expansion for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    13. Zhang, Jinhao & Xiao, Mi & Gao, Liang, 2019. "An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 90-102.
    14. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    15. Pepper, Nick & Crespo, Luis & Montomoli, Francesco, 2022. "Adaptive learning for reliability analysis using Support Vector Machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Yang, Seonghyeok & Lee, Mingyu & Lee, Ikjin, 2023. "A new sampling approach for system reliability-based design optimization under multiple simulation models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Yang, Seonghyeok & Jo, Hwisang & Lee, Kyungeun & Lee, Ikjin, 2022. "Expected system improvement (ESI): A new learning function for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Yuan, Kai & Zhan, Hongyou, 2022. "System reliability analysis based on dependent Kriging predictions and parallel learning strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    19. Guo, Qing & Liu, Yongshou & Chen, Bingqian & Yao, Qin, 2021. "A variable and mode sensitivity analysis method for structural system using a novel active learning Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2021. "A Kriging-assisted sampling method for reliability analysis of structures with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.