IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v176y2018icp93-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust weighted SVR-based software reliability growth model

Author

Listed:
  • Utkin, Lev V.
  • Coolen, Frank P.A.

Abstract

This paper proposes a new software reliability growth model (SRGM), which can be regarded as an extension of the non-parametric SRGMs using support vector regression to predict probability measures of time to software failure. The first novelty underlying the proposed model is the use of a set of weights instead of precise weights as done in the established non-parametric SRGMs, and to minimize the expected risk in the framework of robust decision making. The second novelty is the use of the intersection of two specific sets of weights, produced by the imprecise ε-contaminated model and by pairwise comparisons, respectively. The sets are chosen in accordance to intuitive conceptions concerning the software reliability behaviour during a debugging process. The proposed model is illustrated using several real data sets and it is compared to the standard non-parametric SRGM.

Suggested Citation

  • Utkin, Lev V. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2018. "A robust weighted SVR-based software reliability growth model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 93-101.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:176:y:2018:i:c:p:93-101
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018304587
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Zio, Enrico & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique, 2011. "Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1527-1534.
    2. Hoang Pham, 2006. "System Software Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-295-9, February.
    3. Hu, Q.P. & Xie, M. & Ng, S.H. & Levitin, G., 2007. "Robust recurrent neural network modeling for software fault detection and correction prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 332-340.
    4. Yang, Bo & Li, Xiang & Xie, Min & Tan, Feng, 2010. "A generic data-driven software reliability model with model mining technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 671-678.
    5. Chiu, Kuei-Chen & Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Lee, Tzai-Zang, 2008. "A study of software reliability growth from the perspective of learning effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1410-1421.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan, Xiukai & Faes, Matthias G.R. & Liu, Shaolong & Valdebenito, Marcos A. & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Efficient imprecise reliability analysis using the Augmented Space Integral," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaver, Donald P. & Jacobs, Patricia A., 2014. "Reliability growth by failure mode removal," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 27-32.
    2. Peng, R. & Li, Y.F. & Zhang, W.J. & Hu, Q.P., 2014. "Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging process considering both detection and correction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 37-43.
    3. Pievatolo, Antonio & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik, 2012. "A Bayesian hidden Markov model for imperfect debugging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 11-21.
    4. Rocco S, Claudio M., 2013. "Singular spectrum analysis and forecasting of failure time series," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 126-136.
    5. Yang, Bo & Li, Xiang & Xie, Min & Tan, Feng, 2010. "A generic data-driven software reliability model with model mining technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 671-678.
    6. Tahere Yaghoobi & Man-Fai Leung, 2023. "Modeling Software Reliability with Learning and Fatigue," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Wei, Zhao & Tao, Tao & ZhuoShu, Ding & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "A dynamic particle filter-support vector regression method for reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 109-116.
    8. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.
    9. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2022. "Reliability analysis of structures by a three-stage sequential sampling based adaptive support vector regression model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    10. Kwang Yoon Song & In Hong Chang & Hoang Pham, 2019. "A Testing Coverage Model Based on NHPP Software Reliability Considering the Software Operating Environment and the Sensitivity Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Tabassum Naz Sindhu & Sadia Anwar & Marwa K. H. Hassan & Showkat Ahmad Lone & Tahani A. Abushal & Anum Shafiq, 2023. "An Analysis of the New Reliability Model Based on Bathtub-Shaped Failure Rate Distribution with Application to Failure Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Khatibinia, Mohsen & Javad Fadaee, Mohammad & Salajegheh, Javad & Salajegheh, Eysa, 2013. "Seismic reliability assessment of RC structures including soil–structure interaction using wavelet weighted least squares support vector machine," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 22-33.
    13. Yang Liu & Naiwei Lu & Xinfeng Yin & Mohammad Noori, 2016. "An adaptive support vector regression method for structural system reliability assessment and its application to a cable-stayed bridge," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(2), pages 204-219, April.
    14. Subhashis Chatterjee & Shobhit Nigam & Jeetendra Bahadur Singh & Lakshmi Narayan Upadhyaya, 2012. "Effect of change point and imperfect debugging in software reliability and its optimal release policy," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 539-551, March.
    15. Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique López & Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Zio, Enrico & Jacinto, Carlos Magno, 2015. "Computing confidence and prediction intervals of industrial equipment degradation by bootstrapped support vector regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 120-128.
    16. Subhashis Chatterjee & Jeetendra B. Singh & Arunava Roy, 2015. "A structure-based software reliability allocation using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 513-525, February.
    17. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2023. "Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Da Hye Lee & In Hong Chang & Hoang Pham, 2020. "Software Reliability Model with Dependent Failures and SPRT," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Anshul Tickoo & P. K. Kapur & A. K. Shrivastava & Sunil K. Khatri, 2016. "Testing effort based modeling to determine optimal release and patching time of software," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(4), pages 427-434, December.
    20. Oh, YeongGwang & Ransikarbum, Kasin & Busogi, Moise & Kwon, Daeil & Kim, Namhun, 2019. "Adaptive SVM-based real-time quality assessment for primer-sealer dispensing process of sunroof assembly line," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 202-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:176:y:2018:i:c:p:93-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.