IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v156y2016icp1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new effective screening design for structural sensitivity analysis of failure probability with the epistemic uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Sinan
  • Lu, Zhenzhou
  • Xu, Liyang

Abstract

In this paper, two new sampling strategies are proposed to estimate the Morris’ screening sensitivity measure and its improved version. The two new sampling strategies, which employ random sampling and quasi-random sampling respectively, compute the elementary effects of each factor at the same initial point and with a same step size in the input space. The new quasi-random sampling strategy performs better than the radial based sampling strategy and the new random sampling strategy performs almost the same with the radial based sampling strategy. Then, the improved version of the Morris’ screening sensitivity measure is applied to estimate the effects of the epistemic uncertainty of random variables’ distribution parameters on the failure probability using the new quasi-random sampling strategy. During this process, the principle of maximum entropy, fractional moments and dimension reduction method are used to estimate the failure probability with a good accuracy and a low computational demand. Several examples are employed to demonstrate the reasonability and the efficiency of the proposed strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Sinan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Xu, Liyang, 2016. "A new effective screening design for structural sensitivity analysis of failure probability with the epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:156:y:2016:i:c:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016302599
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubois, Didier, 2006. "Possibility theory and statistical reasoning," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 47-69, November.
    2. Kucherenko, S. & Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. & Pantelides, C. & Shah, N., 2009. "Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1135-1148.
    3. Crestaux, Thierry & Le Maıˆtre, Olivier & Martinez, Jean-Marc, 2009. "Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1161-1172.
    4. Sudret, B. & Mai, C.V., 2015. "Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 241-250.
    5. Ratto, M. & Pagano, A. & Young, P.C., 2009. "Non-parametric estimation of conditional moments for sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 237-243.
    6. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.
    2. Deng, Jian, 2022. "Probabilistic characterization of soil properties based on the maximum entropy method from fractional moments: Model development, case study, and application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Chen, Jun-Yu & Feng, Yun-Wen & Teng, Da & Lu, Cheng & Fei, Cheng-Wei, 2022. "Support vector machine-based similarity selection method for structural transient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Yogesh P. Khare & Rajendra Paudel & Ruscena Wiederholt & Anteneh Z. Abiy & Thomas Van Lent & Stephen E. Davis & Younggu Her, 2021. "Watershed Response to Legacy Phosphorus and Best Management Practices in an Impacted Agricultural Watershed in Florida, U.S.A," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.
    6. Shi, Wen & Chen, Xi, 2019. "Controlled Morris method: A new factor screening approach empowered by a distribution-free sequential multiple testing procedure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 299-314.
    7. Zdeněk Kala, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis in Probabilistic Structural Design: A Comparison of Selected Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    2. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    3. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    4. Constantine, Paul G. & Diaz, Paul, 2017. "Global sensitivity metrics from active subspaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.
    6. Buzzard, Gregery T., 2012. "Global sensitivity analysis using sparse grid interpolation and polynomial chaos," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-89.
    7. Attar, Peter J. & Vedula, Prakash, 2013. "On convergence of moments in uncertainty quantification based on direct quadrature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 119-125.
    8. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    9. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    10. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    11. Chen, Xin & Molina-Cristóbal, Arturo & Guenov, Marin D. & Riaz, Atif, 2019. "Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 97-115.
    12. Melito, Gian Marco & Müller, Thomas Stephan & Badeli, Vahid & Ellermann, Katrin & Brenn, Günter & Reinbacher-Köstinger, Alice, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis study on the effect of the fluid mechanics assumptions for the computation of electrical conductivity of flowing human blood," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis: a generalized, unbiased and optimal estimator of total-effect variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 361-386, March.
    14. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    15. Liu, Yaning & Yousuff Hussaini, M. & Ökten, Giray, 2016. "Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 281-295.
    16. Wang, Zequn & Chen, Wei, 2016. "Time-variant reliability assessment through equivalent stochastic process transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 166-175.
    17. Wong, Chun Yui & Seshadri, Pranay & Parks, Geoffrey, 2021. "Extremum sensitivity analysis with polynomial Monte Carlo filtering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    18. Shang, Yue & Nogal, Maria & Teixeira, Rui & Wolfert, A.R. (Rogier) M., 2024. "Extreme-oriented sensitivity analysis using sparse polynomial chaos expansion. Application to train–track–bridge systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Marrel, Amandine & Chabridon, Vincent, 2021. "Statistical developments for target and conditional sensitivity analysis: Application on safety studies for nuclear reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    20. Sudret, B. & Mai, C.V., 2015. "Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 241-250.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:156:y:2016:i:c:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.