IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v51y2006i1p47-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibility theory and statistical reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Dubois, Didier

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Dubois, Didier, 2006. "Possibility theory and statistical reasoning," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 47-69, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:1:p:47-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(06)00114-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubois, Didier & Prade, Henri, 1986. "Fuzzy sets and statistical data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 345-356.
    2. Borgelt, Christian & Kruse, Rudolf, 2002. "Learning from imprecise data: possibilistic graphical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 449-463, February.
    3. Gil, María Angeles, 1992. "A note on the connection between fuzzy numbers and random intervals," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 311-319, March.
    4. Couso, Ines & Moral, Serafin & Walley, Peter, 2000. "A survey of concepts of independence for imprecise probabilities," Risk, Decision and Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 165-181, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Triantis, Konstantinos & Sarangi, Sudipta & Kuchta, Dorota, 2003. "Fuzzy pair-wise dominance and fuzzy indices: An evaluation of productive performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 412-428, January.
    2. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio, 2013. "Uncertainty Analysis in Fault Tree Models with Dependent Basic Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1146-1173, June.
    3. Xiaomin You & Fulvio Tonon, 2012. "Event‐Tree Analysis with Imprecise Probabilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 330-344, February.
    4. Jon T Selvik & Eirik B Abrahamsen, 2017. "On the meaning of accuracy and precision in a risk analysis context," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 91-100, April.
    5. Ertugrul Karsak, E. & Tolga, Ethem, 2001. "Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 49-64, January.
    6. Petrovic, Dobrila, 2001. "Simulation of supply chain behaviour and performance in an uncertain environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 429-438, May.
    7. Stavros Lopatatzidis & Jasper Bock & Gert Cooman & Stijn Vuyst & Joris Walraevens, 2016. "Robust queueing theory: an initial study using imprecise probabilities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 75-101, February.
    8. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Guo, P. & Yang, Z.F. & Nie, S.L., 2010. "A dual-interval vertex analysis method and its application to environmental decision making under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 536-550, January.
    9. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1999. "Supply chain modelling using fuzzy sets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 443-453, March.
    10. Zhang, Y.M. & Lu, H.W. & Nie, X.H. & He, L. & Du, P., 2014. "An interactive inexact fuzzy bounded programming approach for agricultural water quality management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 104-111.
    11. Luiz Gomes & Maria Machado & Luis Rangel, 2013. "Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: the TODIM method with criteria interactions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 531-548, December.
    12. SakallI, Ümit Sami & Baykoç, Ömer Faruk, 2011. "An optimization approach for brass casting blending problem under aletory and epistemic uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 708-718, October.
    13. Petrovic, Dobrila & Petrovic, Radivoj & Vujosevic, Mirko, 1996. "Fuzzy models for the newsboy problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 435-441, August.
    14. Munda, G. & Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P., 1995. "Qualitative multicriteria methods for fuzzy evaluation problems: An illustration of economic-ecological evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 79-97, April.
    15. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1998. "Modelling and simulation of a supply chain in an uncertain environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 299-309, September.
    16. Xie, Ying & Petrovic, Dobrila & Burnham, Keith, 2006. "A heuristic procedure for the two-level control of serial supply chains under fuzzy customer demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 37-50, July.
    17. Wu, Hsien-Chung, 2003. "The fuzzy estimators of fuzzy parameters based on fuzzy random variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 101-114, April.
    18. Sébastien Destercke, 2017. "On the median in imprecise ordinal problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(2), pages 375-392, September.
    19. Vorobyev, Oleg, 2009. "Eventology versus contemporary theories of uncertainty," MPRA Paper 13961, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:1:p:47-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.