IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v138y2015icp232-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advanced surrogate model and sensitivity analysis methods for sodium fast reactor accident assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Marrel, A.
  • Marie, N.
  • De Lozzo, M.

Abstract

Within the framework of the generation IV Sodium Fast Reactors, the safety in case of severe accidents is assessed. From this statement, CEA has developed a new physical tool to model the accident initiated by the Total Instantaneous Blockage (TIB) of a sub-assembly. This TIB simulator depends on many uncertain input parameters. This paper aims at proposing a global methodology combining several advanced statistical techniques in order to perform a global sensitivity analysis of this TIB simulator. The objective is to identify the most influential uncertain inputs for the various TIB outputs involved in the safety analysis. The proposed statistical methodology combining several advanced statistical techniques enables to take into account the constraints on the TIB simulator outputs (positivity constraints) and to deal simultaneously with various outputs. To do this, a space-filling design is used and the corresponding TIB model simulations are performed. Based on this learning sample, an efficient constrained Gaussian process metamodel is fitted on each TIB model outputs. Then, using the metamodels, classical sensitivity analyses are made for each TIB output. Multivariate global sensitivity analyses based on aggregated indices are also performed, providing additional valuable information. Main conclusions on the influence of each uncertain input are derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Marrel, A. & Marie, N. & De Lozzo, M., 2015. "Advanced surrogate model and sensitivity analysis methods for sodium fast reactor accident assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 232-241.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:232-241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015000290
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lamboni, Matieyendou & Monod, Hervé & Makowski, David, 2011. "Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 450-459.
    2. Jeremy Oakley, 2002. "Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(4), pages 769-784, December.
    3. Marrel, Amandine & Iooss, Bertrand & Van Dorpe, François & Volkova, Elena, 2008. "An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4731-4744, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Betancourt, José & Bachoc, François & Klein, Thierry & Idier, Déborah & Pedreros, Rodrigo & Rohmer, Jérémy, 2020. "Gaussian process metamodeling of functional-input code for coastal flood hazard assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Storlie, Curtis B. & Reich, Brian J. & Helton, Jon C. & Swiler, Laura P. & Sallaberry, Cedric J., 2013. "Analysis of computationally demanding models with continuous and categorical inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 30-41.
    3. Simon Nanty & Céline Helbert & Amandine Marrel & Nadia Pérot & Clémentine Prieur, 2017. "Uncertainty quantification for functional dependent random variables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 559-583, June.
    4. Francisco A. Buendia-Hernandez & Maria J. Ortiz Bevia & Francisco J. Alvarez-Garcia & Antonio Ruizde Elvira, 2022. "Sensitivity of a Dynamic Model of Air Traffic Emissions to Technological and Environmental Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Heredia, María Belén & Prieur, Clémentine & Eckert, Nicolas, 2022. "Global sensitivity analysis with aggregated Shapley effects, application to avalanche hazard assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Jakub Bijak & Jason D. Hilton & Eric Silverman & Viet Dung Cao, 2013. "Reforging the Wedding Ring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(27), pages 729-766.
    7. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    8. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2022. "Efficient dependency models: Simulating dependent random variables," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 199-217.
    9. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2019. "Multivariate sensitivity analysis: Minimum variance unbiased estimators of the first-order and total-effect covariance matrices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 67-92.
    10. Veiga, Sébastien Da & Marrel, Amandine, 2020. "Gaussian process regression with linear inequality constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    11. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    12. Cao, Jiaokun & Du, Farong & Ding, Shuiting, 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis for dynamic systems with stochastic input processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 106-117.
    13. Auder, Benjamin & De Crecy, Agnès & Iooss, Bertrand & Marquès, Michel, 2012. "Screening and metamodeling of computer experiments with functional outputs. Application to thermal–hydraulic computations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 122-131.
    14. Wang, Fuzhang & Idrees, M & Sohail, Ayesha, 2022. "“AI-MCMC” for the parametric analysis of the hormonal therapy of cancer," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Barbillon, Pierre & Celeux, Gilles & Grimaud, Agnès & Lefebvre, Yannick & De Rocquigny, Étienne, 2011. "Nonlinear methods for inverse statistical problems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 132-142, January.
    16. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Ismael Ahrazem Dfuf & José Manuel Mira McWilliams & María Camino González Fernández, 2019. "Multi-Output Conditional Inference Trees Applied to the Electricity Market: Variable Importance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Liu, Yushan & Li, Luyi & Chang, Zeming, 2023. "Efficient Bayesian model updating for dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    19. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2021. "Derivative-based integral equalities and inequality: A proxy-measure for sensitivity analysis," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 137-161.
    20. Touzani, Samir & Busby, Daniel, 2013. "Smoothing spline analysis of variance approach for global sensitivity analysis of computer codes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 67-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:232-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.