IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v96y2011i11p1515-1526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic fault trees resolution: A conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Chiacchio, F.
  • Compagno, L.
  • D'Urso, D.
  • Manno, G.
  • Trapani, N.

Abstract

Safety assessment in industrial plants with ‘major hazards’ requires a rigorous combination of both qualitative and quantitative techniques of RAMS. Quantitative assessment can be executed by static or dynamic tools of dependability but, while the former are not sufficient to model exhaustively time-dependent activities, the latter are still too complex to be used with success by the operators of the industrial field.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiacchio, F. & Compagno, L. & D'Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Trapani, N., 2011. "Dynamic fault trees resolution: A conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1515-1526.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:11:p:1515-1526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832011001335
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Muchiri, Peter, 2015. "Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 663-676.
    2. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    3. Manno, G. & Chiacchio, F. & Compagno, L. & D'Urso, D. & Trapani, N., 2014. "Conception of Repairable Dynamic Fault Trees and resolution by the use of RAATSS, a Matlab® toolbox based on the ATS formalism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 250-262.
    4. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & D’Urso, Diego & Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Catterson, Victoria M., 2018. "On the use of dynamic reliability for an accurate modelling of renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 605-621.
    5. Son, Kwang Seop & Kim, Dong Hoon & Kim, Chang Hwoi & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2016. "Study on the systematic approach of Markov modeling for dependability analysis of complex fault-tolerant features with voting logics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 44-57.
    6. Chiacchio, F. & D’Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Compagno, L., 2016. "Stochastic hybrid automaton model of a multi-state system with aging: Reliability assessment and design consequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Raoni, Rafael & Secchi, Argimiro R., 2019. "Procedures to model and solve probabilistic dynamic system problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    9. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & Iacono, Alessandra & Compagno, Lucio & D'Urso, Diego, 2020. "A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Chiacchio, F. & Cacioppo, M. & D'Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Trapani, N. & Compagno, L., 2013. "A Weibull-based compositional approach for hierarchical dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 45-52.
    11. Sejin Baek & Gyunyoung Heo, 2021. "Application of Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis to Prioritize Electric Power Systems in Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:11:p:1515-1526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.