IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v275y2024ics0925527324002019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding no fault found event risk in military aircraft MRO planning: A step towards robust bidding and contract finalization

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Vipin Prakash
  • Ganguly, Kunal K.
  • Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal

Abstract

No fault found (NFF) is a reported fault for which the root cause cannot be found. An NFF event not only reduces the availability of the equipment to customers but also results in financial losses to the manufacturer. To date, risk due to NFF events is not considered separately in aircraft Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) planning. In this paper, we have studied the NFF event risk identification, distribution, and optimization in an aircraft MRO process based on data collected over three decades of aircraft maintenance. For framework development and formulating the critical NFF risk drivers, this paper applies soft system methodology with detailed semi-structured interviews of industry experts. For NFF risk distribution and optimization, we have used agent-based simulation modeling. The quantitative assessment of more than 5000 NFF cases in an aircraft MRO organization shows that NFF events are significantly non-deterministic during the life cycle of an aircraft. The three identified critical NFF risk drivers in the research are the MRO process stage, aircraft life cycle stage, and human working skills. The MRO process stage is the time of the NFF event during repair activity. The life cycle stage represents the timeline of the NFF event in useful aircraft life. Human working skill represents the role of manpower in the NFF event solution. Further theoretical elaborations of the research lead to the optimized NFF risk break-up at the contract preparation stage and risk driver's sensitivity analysis by the aircraft assembler, operator, and sub-contractor at the commercial bid submission stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Vipin Prakash & Ganguly, Kunal K. & Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal, 2024. "Understanding no fault found event risk in military aircraft MRO planning: A step towards robust bidding and contract finalization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:275:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324002019
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324002019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lowas, Albert F. & Ciarallo, Frank W., 2016. "Reliability and operations: Keys to lumpy aircraft spare parts demands," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 30-40.
    2. Khan, Samir & Phillips, Paul & Jennions, Ian & Hockley, Chris, 2014. "No Fault Found events in maintenance engineering Part 1: Current trends, implications and organizational practices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 183-195.
    3. Lofsten, Hans, 2000. "Measuring maintenance performance - in search for a maintenance productivity index," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 47-58, January.
    4. Murthy, D.N.P. & Karim, M.R. & Ahmadi, A., 2015. "Data management in maintenance outsourcing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-110.
    5. Khan, Samir & Phillips, Paul & Hockley, Chris & Jennions, Ian, 2014. "No Fault Found events in maintenance engineering Part 2: Root causes, technical developments and future research," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 196-208.
    6. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    7. Safaei, Nima & Jardine, Andrew K.S., 2018. "Aircraft routing with generalized maintenance constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 111-122.
    8. Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2014. "Integrated spare parts logistics and operations planning for maintenance service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 44-53.
    9. Dinis, Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos, 2019. "A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Ahmet Erkoyuncu, John & Khan, Samir & Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal & Roy, Rajkumar, 2016. "A framework to estimate the cost of No-Fault Found events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 207-222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dinis, Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos, 2019. "A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Ahmet Erkoyuncu, John & Khan, Samir & Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal & Roy, Rajkumar, 2016. "A framework to estimate the cost of No-Fault Found events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 207-222.
    3. Prakash Chandra & Yogesh Mani Tripathi & Liang Wang & Chandrakant Lodhi, 2023. "Estimation for Kies distribution with generalized progressive hybrid censoring under partially observed competing risks model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1048-1072, December.
    4. Binoy Debnath & Md Shihab Shakur & Fahmida Tanjum & M. Azizur Rahman & Ziaul Haq Adnan, 2022. "Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Supply Chain of Aerospace Spare Parts Industry—A Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Yoon, Joung Taek & Youn, Byeng D. & Yoo, Minji & Kim, Yunhan & Kim, Sooho, 2019. "Life-cycle maintenance cost analysis framework considering time-dependent false and missed alarms for fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 181-192.
    6. Han, Changwoon & Park, Seungil & Lee, Hyeonseok, 2019. "Intermittent failure in electrical interconnection of avionics system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 61-71.
    7. Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet & Khan, Samir & Eiroa, Alexandre López & Butler, Nigel & Rushton, Keith & Brocklebank, Simon, 2017. "Perspectives on trading cost and availability for corrective maintenance at the equipment type level," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 53-69.
    8. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    9. Hu, Shaolong & Han, Chuanfeng & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Meng, Lingpeng, 2019. "A multi-stage stochastic programming model for relief distribution considering the state of road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 64-87.
    10. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    12. Zohreh Molamohamadi & Mahmoud Asad Samani & Marjan Karimi, 2024. "Reviewing the historical milestones of risk management," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    14. Mangirdas Morkunas & Gintaras Cernius & Gintare Giriuniene, 2019. "Assessing Business Risks of Natural Gas Trading Companies: Evidence from GET Baltic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    16. Dr Jason Mwanza & Nothando Tshuma, 2023. "Mitigating Business Risk in Manufacturing SMEs: A nexus between informal and formal business risk management: A case of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(1), pages 1107-1138, January.
    17. Li, Weijun & Sun, Qiqi & Zhang, Jiwang & Zhang, Laibin, 2024. "Quantitative risk assessment of industrial hot work using Adaptive Bow Tie and Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Don Pagach & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2020. "The Challenges and Opportunities for ERM Post-COVID-19: Agendas for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, December.
    19. KeumJi Kim & SeongHwan Yoon, 2018. "Assessment of Building Damage Risk by Natural Disasters in South Korea Using Decision Tree Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Tatiana Yu. Kudryavtseva & Angi E. Skhvediani & Maiia S. Leukhina & Alexandra O. Schneider, 2023. "A Fuzzy Model for Personnel Risk Analysis: Case of Russian-Finnish Export-Import Operations of Small and Medium Enterprises," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(3), pages 683-709.
    21. Marcin Nowak & Rafał Mierzwiak & Marcin Butlewski, 2020. "Occupational risk assessment with grey system theory," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 717-732, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:275:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324002019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.