IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v271y2024ics0925527324000884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensuring the sustainable supply of semiconductor material: A case of germanium in China

Author

Listed:
  • Mei, Yueru
  • Geng, Yong
  • Chen, Zhujun
  • Xiao, Shijiang
  • Gao, Ziyan

Abstract

The semiconductor industry relies on the sustainable supply of critical mineral resources, such as Germanium (Ge), a key metal used in making electronics, fiber cables and solar cells. However, since Ge is a companion element, its primary production is constrained by the availability of host minerals such as zinc and coal. As such, its recycling is challenging since both recycling networks and technologies are still in its early infancy. There are increasing concerns on how to meet with the future demand for Ge due to its limited supply. This study aims to uncover the metabolic characteristics of the Ge cycle in China for the period of 2002–2021 from a whole life cycle perspective by employing a dynamic material flow analysis. The results show that China's demand for Ge had increased from 19.16 tons in 2002 to 85.87 tons in 2021. Fiber cables and infrared optical instruments consumed the most Ge resource, accounting for 54.59% and 36.76% of the total Ge consumption, respectively. The in-use Ge stock had increased more than 40 folds, implying a substantial potential for future recycling. The majority of Ge was extracted from coal ash and zinc concentrates, with figures of 1086.92 tons and 585.27 tons respectively, while only 13.45 tons of Ge were recovered from those end-of-life products. Furthermore, the Ge loss reached 1586.31 tons at the production stage. The Ge stock in those intermediate products has gradually decreased. The cumulative Ge export amount contained in various products was 655.64 tons, mainly dominated by intermediate products, while the share of final products increased in recent years. Based on these findings, several policy recommendations are proposed, including improving Ge production efficiency and expanding Ge supply sources, establishing a comprehensive Ge recycling system, and upgrading the entire Ge industrial chain. These policies can help better cope with the challenges that the global semiconductor supply chain is facing.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei, Yueru & Geng, Yong & Chen, Zhujun & Xiao, Shijiang & Gao, Ziyan, 2024. "Ensuring the sustainable supply of semiconductor material: A case of germanium in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:271:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324000884
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324000884
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Fernanda Godoy León & Cristina T. Matos & Konstantinos Georgitzikis & Fabrice Mathieux & Jo Dewulf, 2022. "Material system analysis: Functional and nonfunctional cobalt in the EU, 2012–2016," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1277-1293, August.
    2. Kinoshita, Yuki & Yamada, Tetsuo & Gupta, Surendra M. & Ishigaki, Aya & Inoue, Masato, 2020. "Decision support model of environmentally friendly and economical material strategy for life cycle cost and recyclable weight," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Christina Licht & Laura Talens Peiró & Gara Villalba, 2015. "Global Substance Flow Analysis of Gallium, Germanium, and Indium: Quantification of Extraction, Uses, and Dissipative Losses within their Anthropogenic Cycles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(5), pages 890-903, October.
    4. David Laner & Julia Feketitsch & Helmut Rechberger & Johann Fellner, 2016. "A Novel Approach to Characterize Data Uncertainty in Material Flow Analysis and its Application to Plastics Flows in Austria," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(5), pages 1050-1063, October.
    5. Ng, Kok Siew & Head, Ian & Premier, Giuliano C. & Scott, Keith & Yu, Eileen & Lloyd, Jon & Sadhukhan, Jhuma, 2016. "A multilevel sustainability analysis of zinc recovery from wastes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-105.
    6. Till Zimmermann & Stefan Gößling-Reisemann, 2014. "Recycling Potentials of Critical Metals-Analyzing Secondary Flows from Selected Applications," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan & Geng, Yong & Sarkis, Joseph, 2017. "Material flow analysis of lithium in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 100-106.
    8. Yu, Yu & Ma, Daipeng & Wang, Yong, 2024. "Structural resilience evolution and vulnerability assessment of semiconductor materials supply network in the global semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Elshkaki, Ayman & Shen, Lei, 2019. "Energy-material nexus: The impacts of national and international energy scenarios on critical metals use in China up to 2050 and their global implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 903-917.
    10. Michael Saidani & Alissa Kendall & Bernard Yannou & Yann Leroy & François Cluzel, 2019. "Closing the loop on platinum from catalytic converters: Contributions from material flow analysis and circularity indicators," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1143-1158, October.
    11. Frenzel, Max & Mikolajczak, Claire & Reuter, Markus A. & Gutzmer, Jens, 2017. "Quantifying the relative availability of high-tech by-product metals – The cases of gallium, germanium and indium," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 327-335.
    12. Shimada, Tomoaki & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 2019. "Closed-Loop supply chain activities in Japanese home appliance/personal computer manufacturers: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 259-265.
    13. Yu, Zhongjue & Geng, Yong & Calzadilla, Alvaro & Wei, Wendong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2023. "Combining mandatory coal power phaseout and emissions trading in China's power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Shan, Feifei & Xiao, Wenli & Yang, Feng, 2021. "Comparison of three E-Waste take-back policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Wang, Jian & He, Shulin, 2023. "Government interventions in closed-loop supply chains with modularity design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. E. M. Harper & Goksin Kavlak & Lara Burmeister & Matthew J. Eckelman & Serkan Erbis & Vicente Sebastian Espinoza & Philip Nuss & T. E. Graedel, 2015. "Criticality of the Geological Zinc, Tin, and Lead Family," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(4), pages 628-644, August.
    17. Luca Ciacci & Tim T. Werner & Ivano Vassura & Fabrizio Passarini, 2019. "Backlighting the European Indium Recycling Potentials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(2), pages 426-437, April.
    18. Ursula J. Gibson & Lei Wei & John Ballato, 2021. "Semiconductor core fibres: materials science in a bottle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Zhang, Bin & Niu, Niu & Li, Hao & Wang, Zhaohua, 2023. "Assessing the efforts of coal phaseout for carbon neutrality in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    20. Ziyan Gao & Yong Geng & Xianlai Zeng & Xu Tian & Tianli Yao & Xiaoqian Song & Chang Su, 2022. "Evolution of the anthropogenic chromium cycle in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 592-608, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Huiling & Wang, Chang & Sun, Kun & Geng, Hongjun & Zuo, Lyushui, 2023. "Material efficiency strategies across the industrial chain to secure indium availability for global carbon neutrality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    2. Li, George Yunxiong & Ascani, Andrea & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "The material basis of modern technologies. A case study on rare metals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    3. Mei, Yueru & Geng, Yong & Xiao, Shijiang & Su, Chang & Gao, Ziyan & Wei, Wendong, 2023. "Dynamic material flow analysis of rhenium in China for 2011–2020," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    4. Hache, Emmanuel & Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Simoen, Marine & Bonnet, Clément & Carcanague, Samuel, 2019. "Critical raw materials and transportation sector electrification: A detailed bottom-up analysis in world transport," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 6-25.
    5. Qiangfeng, Li & Weiqiong, Zhong & Gaoshang, Wang & Jinhua, Cheng & Tao, Dai & Bojie, Wen & Liang, Liang & Qindong, Yang, 2018. "Material and value flows of iron in Chinese international trade from 2010 to 2016," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 139-147.
    6. Helbig, Christoph & Bradshaw, Alex M. & Kolotzek, Christoph & Thorenz, Andrea & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "Supply risks associated with CdTe and CIGS thin-film photovoltaics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 422-433.
    7. Zhao, Guimei & Li, Wenxiu & Geng, Yong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2023. "Dynamic material flow analysis of antimony resources in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    8. Frenzel, Max & Mikolajczak, Claire & Reuter, Markus A. & Gutzmer, Jens, 2017. "Quantifying the relative availability of high-tech by-product metals – The cases of gallium, germanium and indium," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 327-335.
    9. Elshkaki, Ayman, 2020. "Long-term analysis of critical materials in future vehicles electrification in China and their national and global implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Shigetomi, Yosuke & Nansai, Keisuke & Kagawa, Shigemi & Kondo, Yasushi & Tohno, Susumu, 2017. "Economic and social determinants of global physical flows of critical metals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 107-113.
    11. Choi, Chul Hun & Kim, Sang-Phil & Lee, Seokcheon & Zhao, Fu, 2020. "Game theoretic production decisions of by-product materials critical for clean energy technologies - Indium as a case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Ren, Kaipeng & Tang, Xu & Wang, Peng & Willerström, Jakob & Höök, Mikael, 2021. "Bridging energy and metal sustainability: Insights from China’s wind power development up to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Guo, Tianjiao & Geng, Yong & Song, Xiaoqian & Rui, Xue & Ge, Zewen, 2023. "Tracing magnesium flows in China: A dynamic material flow analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Liu, Feng & van den Bergh, Jeroen & Wei, Yihang, 2024. "Testing mechanisms through which China's ETS promotes a low-carbon transition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Jan Streeck & Quirin Dammerer & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Fridolin Krausmann, 2021. "The role of socio‐economic material stocks for natural resource use in the United States of America from 1870 to 2100," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1486-1502, December.
    17. Michael Saidani & Alissa Kendall & Bernard Yannou & Yann Leroy & François Cluzel, 2019. "Closing the loop on platinum from catalytic converters: Contributions from material flow analysis and circularity indicators," Post-Print hal-02094798, HAL.
    18. Song, Huiling & Wang, Chang & Lei, Xiaojie & Zhang, Hongwei, 2022. "Dynamic dependence between main-byproduct metals and the role of clean energy market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Jiang, Meihui & An, Haizhong & Guan, Qing & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2018. "Global embodied mineral flow between industrial sectors: A network perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 192-201.
    20. Dhiya Durani Sofian Azizi & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Kok Sin Woon, 2023. "Material Flow Analysis in WEEE Management for Circular Economy: A Content Review on Applications, Limitations, and Future Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:271:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324000884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.