IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v224y2020ics0925527319303718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision support model of environmentally friendly and economical material strategy for life cycle cost and recyclable weight

Author

Listed:
  • Kinoshita, Yuki
  • Yamada, Tetsuo
  • Gupta, Surendra M.
  • Ishigaki, Aya
  • Inoue, Masato

Abstract

Materials and parts selection in product design phase will affect procurement cost, assembly cost and recycling costs in manufacturing phase. Similar to such costs, recyclable weight depends on material types due to different material manufacturing processes. As material shortages have increased, environmentally friendly and economical material selection is required. Since assembly products consist of various parts made of different materials, it is difficult and complex to evaluate recyclable weight and costs simultaneously in the assembly product design. This selection is considered as a multi-criteria decision-making problem in which objective functions have trade-off relationships. Thus, a decision support model is required to enable product designers to evaluate alternative material in terms of both environmental and economic aspects among procurement, assembly, and recycling. As a method of solving the multi-criteria decision-making problems, goal programming is recognized as one of the effective ways of evaluating the different objective functions simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinoshita, Yuki & Yamada, Tetsuo & Gupta, Surendra M. & Ishigaki, Aya & Inoue, Masato, 2020. "Decision support model of environmentally friendly and economical material strategy for life cycle cost and recyclable weight," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:224:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319303718
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319303718
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcus Brandenburg, 2015. "Low carbon supply chain configuration for a new product – a goal programming approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(21), pages 6588-6610, November.
    2. Awanis Romli & Paul Prickett & Rossitza Setchi & Shwe Soe, 2015. "Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 549-571, January.
    3. Marsillac, Erika & Roh, James Jungbae, 2014. "Connecting product design, process and supply chain decisions to strengthen global supply chain capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 317-329.
    4. Johnson, Michael & Kirchain, Randolph, 2009. "Quantifying the effects of parts consolidation and development costs on material selection decisions: A process-based costing approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 174-186, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tan Ching Ng & Sie Yee Lau & Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi & Meng Suan Liang, 2022. "The Application of Industry 4.0 Technological Constituents for Sustainable Manufacturing: A Content-Centric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Mei, Yueru & Geng, Yong & Chen, Zhujun & Xiao, Shijiang & Gao, Ziyan, 2024. "Ensuring the sustainable supply of semiconductor material: A case of germanium in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Andrișan & Cătălin Grădinaru & Sorin-George Toma, 2022. "Circular Economy Business Models: The Case of Lush," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 491-497, Decembrie.
    2. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    3. Johnson, Michael D. & Kirchain, Randolph E., 2009. "Quantifying the effects of product family decisions on material selection: A process-based costing approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 653-668, August.
    4. Jui-Che Tu & Yukari Nagai & Min-Chieh Shih, 2018. "Establishing Design Strategies and an Assessment Tool of Home Appliances to Promote Sustainable Behavior for the New Poor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Tolonen, Arto & Haapasalo, Harri & Harkonen, Janne & Verrollot, Jordan, 2017. "Supply chain capability creation – The creation of the supply chain readiness for a new product during product development process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 237-245.
    6. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Elifcan Göçmen & Rızvan Erol, 2018. "The Problem of Sustainable Intermodal Transportation: A Case Study of an International Logistics Company, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Fang Huang & Honghua Hu & Han Song & Haiyan Li & Shasha Zhang & Jia Zhai, 2023. "Allocation of the Carbon Emission Abatement Target in Low Carbon Supply Chain Considering Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Akamphon, Sappinandana & Sukkasi, Sittha & Boonyongmaneerat, Yuttanant, 2012. "Reduction of zinc consumption with enhanced corrosion protection in hot-dip galvanized coatings: A process-based cost analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-7.
    10. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    11. Fernando E. Garcia-Muiña & Rocío González-Sánchez & Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Identifying the Equilibrium Point between Sustainability Goals and Circular Economy Practices in an Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Context Using Eco-Design," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Duffner, Fabian & Mauler, Lukas & Wentker, Marc & Leker, Jens & Winter, Martin, 2021. "Large-scale automotive battery cell manufacturing: Analyzing strategic and operational effects on manufacturing costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Remica Aggarwal & S. P. Singh, 2019. "An integrated NPV-based supply chain configuration with third-party logistics services," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 367-375, October.
    14. Mohd Effendi Muhammad Suandi & Mohammad Harith Amlus & Abdul Rahman Hemdi & Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim & Mohd Fathullah Ghazali & Nur Liza Rahim, 2022. "A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-56, July.
    15. Paolo Morganti & Rosa Carolina Valdes, 2023. "The Perils of Asymmetrical Technological Changes in a Knowledge Economy with Complete Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Carlos A. Moreno-Camacho & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres & Anicia Jaegler, 2023. "Sustainable supply chain network design: a study of the Colombian dairy sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 573-599, May.
    17. Christophe Combemale & Kate S Whitefoot & Laurence Ales & Erica R H Fuchs, 2021. "Not all technological change is equal: how the separability of tasks mediates the effect of technology change on skill demand [Patterns of industrial innovation]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1361-1387.
    18. Jun Wang & Qian Zhang & Xinman Lu & Rui Ma & Baoqin Yu & Huming Gao, 2022. "Emission reduction and coordination of a dynamic supply chain with green reputation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3945-3988, September.
    19. Hussain, Safdar & Ahmed, Wasim & Rabnawaz, Ambar & Jafar, Rana Muhammad Sohail & Akhtar, Haseeb & GuangJu, Wang & Ullah, Sana & JianZhou, Yang, 2015. "Integration and Effective Supply Chain Management: A Review of Agriculture in Pakistan and China," MPRA Paper 70380, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Junjun Liu & Yong Geng & Biao Chen & Xiqiang Xia, 2021. "The Effect of a Supplier’s Eco-Design on the Economic Benefits of a Supply Chain and Associated Coordination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:224:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319303718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.