IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v226y2020ics0925527320300025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilient planning strategies to support disruption-tolerant production operations

Author

Listed:
  • Puchkova, Alena
  • McFarlane, Duncan
  • Srinivasan, Rengarajan
  • Thorne, Alan

Abstract

The challenge being addressed in this paper is how best to prepare production for the potential disruptive events in order to minimise the impact of these unexpected disturbances. In particular, the paper is focusing on two particular approaches to disruption preparation. The first examines the optimal location and quantity of inventory or “work-in-progress”. The second explores the role of inspection stations in providing timely warning of quality issues. A mathematical model of the operations of a production system is suggested, which covers several types of disruptions: resource breakdowns with unknown start time, product quality losses and random demand fluctuations. The optimal solution minimises a total cost objective function, which is made up of production costs, inventory holding costs, inspection costs, as well as penalty costs for the lost or uncompleted orders. As an output, the model gives the best location and quantity of inventory and the best location of inspection points for any arbitrary production system. The model is first formulated as an optimal control problem, and it is shown how to transform it to a quadratic integer programming problem. The approach was applied to study an industrial strength laboratory production system that reflects the actual industrial disruption scenarios experienced by an industrial collaborator in a key production facility. The optimal solution for this laboratory system is presented and its evaluation is shown under several scenarios with disruptions. The model was also tested on large scale production systems with up to 500 resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Puchkova, Alena & McFarlane, Duncan & Srinivasan, Rengarajan & Thorne, Alan, 2020. "Resilient planning strategies to support disruption-tolerant production operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:226:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320300025
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320300025
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jian Yang & Xiangtong Qi & Gang Yu, 2005. "Disruption management in production planning," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 420-442, August.
    2. Duan Li & Xiaoling Sun, 2006. "Nonlinear Integer Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-32995-6, December.
    3. Murphy Choy & Michelle L. F. Cheong, 2011. "Identification of Demand through Statistical Distribution Modeling for Improved Demand Forecasting," Papers 1110.0062, arXiv.org.
    4. Shi, Chuan & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2009. "An efficient buffer design algorithm for production line profit maximization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 725-740, December.
    5. Tirkel, Israel & Rabinowitz, Gad, 2014. "Modeling cost benefit analysis of inspection in a production line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 38-45.
    6. Lutz, Christian M. & Roscoe Davis, K. & Sun, Minghe, 1998. "Determining buffer location and size in production lines using tabu search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 301-316, April.
    7. Robert Inman & Dennis Blumenfeld & Ningjian Huang & Jingshan Li & Jing Li, 2013. "Survey of recent advances on the interface between production system design and quality," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 557-574.
    8. Colledani, Marcello & Tolio, Tullio, 2009. "Performance evaluation of production systems monitored by statistical process control and off-line inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 348-367, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Essuman, Dominic & Boso, Nathaniel & Annan, Jonathan, 2020. "Operational resilience, disruption, and efficiency: Conceptual and empirical analyses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Manik Debnath & Sanat Kr. Mazumder & Md Billal Hossain & Arindam Garai & Csaba Balint Illes, 2023. "Optimal Base-Stock Inventory-Management Policies of Cement Retailers under Supply-Side Disruptions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-34, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Joint economic design of production, continuous sampling inspection and preventive maintenance of a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 184-198.
    2. Muhammad Babar Ramzan & Shehreyar Mohsin Qureshi & Sonia Irshad Mari & Muhammad Saad Memon & Mandeep Mittal & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Waqas Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of Time-Varying Factors on Optimal Combination of Quality Inspectors for Offline Inspection Station," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Alfieri, Arianna & Matta, Andrea, 2012. "Mathematical programming formulations for approximate simulation of multistage production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 773-783.
    4. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    5. Eric W. K. See-To & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2018. "Customer reviews for demand distribution and sales nowcasting: a big data approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 415-431, November.
    6. Guo, Jian-Xin & Huang, Chen, 2020. "Feasible roadmap for CCS retrofit of coal-based power plants to reduce Chinese carbon emissions by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Cascón, J.M. & González-Arteaga, T. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2019. "Reaching social consensus family budgets: The Spanish case," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 28-41.
    8. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Integrated production, sampling quality control and maintenance of deteriorating production systems with AOQL constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 110-126.
    9. Guo, Chiquan & Wang, Yong J. & Metcalf, Ashley, 2014. "How to calibrate conventional market-oriented organizational culture in 21st century production-centered firms? A customer relationship perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-245.
    10. Cheng, Guoqing & Li, Ling, 2020. "Joint optimization of production, quality control and maintenance for serial-parallel multistage production systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Fatima Bellahcene, 2019. "Application of the polyblock method to special integer chance constrained problem," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(4), pages 23-40.
    12. Chunli Liu & Jianjun Gao, 2015. "A polynomial case of convex integer quadratic programming problems with box integer constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 661-674, August.
    13. L. Escudero & M. Garín & G. Pérez & A. Unzueta, 2012. "Lagrangian Decomposition for large-scale two-stage stochastic mixed 0-1 problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(2), pages 347-374, July.
    14. Kouhei Harada, 2021. "A Feasibility-Ensured Lagrangian Heuristic for General Decomposable Problems," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Bin Zhang & Bo Chen, 2012. "Heuristic And Exact Solution Method For Convex Nonlinear Knapsack Problem," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 29(05), pages 1-14.
    16. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2022. "Omnichannel facility location and fulfillment optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 187-209.
    17. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    18. Federico Della Croce & Dominique Quadri, 2012. "Improving an exact approach for solving separable integer quadratic knapsack problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 21-28, January.
    19. Guan Wang & Yang Woo Shin & Dug Hee Moon, 2016. "Comparison of three flow line layouts with unreliable machines and profit maximization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 669-693, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:226:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320300025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.