IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i1p51-d195369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Time-Varying Factors on Optimal Combination of Quality Inspectors for Offline Inspection Station

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Babar Ramzan

    (Department of Garment Manufacturing, National Textile University, Faisalabad 37610, Pakistan)

  • Shehreyar Mohsin Qureshi

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75270, Pakistan)

  • Sonia Irshad Mari

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Saad Memon

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Mandeep Mittal

    (Department of Mathematics, Amity Institute of Applied Science, Amity University, Noida 201313, India)

  • Muhammad Imran

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 15588, Korea)

  • Muhammad Waqas Iqbal

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

Abstract

With advanced manufacturing technology, organizations like to cut their operational cost and improve product quality, yet the importance of human labor is still alive in some manufacturing industries. The performance of human-based systems depends much on the skill of labor that varies person to person within available manpower. Much work has been done on human resource and management, however, allocation of manpower based on their skill yet not investigated. For this purpose, this study considered offline inspection system where inspection is performed by the human labor of varying skill levels. A multi-objective optimization model is proposed based on Time-Varying factors; inspection skill, operation time and learning behavior. Min-max goal programming technique was used to determine the efficient combination of inspectors of each skill level at different time intervals of a running order. The optimized results ensured the achievement of all objectives of inspection station: the cost associated with inspectors, outgoing quality and inspected quantity. The obtained results proved that inspection performance of inspectors improves significantly with learning and revision of allocation of inspectors with the proposed model ensure better utilization of available manpower, maintain good quality and reduce cost as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Babar Ramzan & Shehreyar Mohsin Qureshi & Sonia Irshad Mari & Muhammad Saad Memon & Mandeep Mittal & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Waqas Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of Time-Varying Factors on Optimal Combination of Quality Inspectors for Offline Inspection Station," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:51-:d:195369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/1/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/1/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chung-Ho Chen & Chao-Yu Chou, 2002. "Economic design of continuous sampling plan under linear inspection cost," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 1003-1009.
    2. Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Thompson, Gerald L., 1996. "Optimal strategies for general price-quality decision models of new products with learning production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 476-489, September.
    3. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Guiffrida, Alfred L., 2008. "Learning curves for imperfect production processes with reworks and process restoration interruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 93-104, August.
    4. Avinoam Tzimerman & Yale Herer, 2009. "Off-line inspections under inspection errors," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 626-641.
    5. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    6. Yale T. Herer & Tzvi Raz, 2000. "Optimal Parallel Inspection for Finding the First Nonconforming Unit in a Batch---An Information Theoretic Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 845-857, June.
    7. Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz, 2010. "Practical Goal Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 1, number 978-1-4419-5771-9, April.
    8. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2007. "Economic off-line quality control strategy with two types of inspection errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 132-147, May.
    9. K. Govindaraju & C. Kandasamy, 2000. "Design of generalized CSP-C continuous sampling plan," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 829-841.
    10. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    11. Mehrdad Mohammadi & Ali Siadat & Jean-Yves Dantan & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2015. "Mathematical modelling of a robust inspection process plan: Taguchi and Monte Carlo methods," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 2202-2224, April.
    12. Duffuaa, S.O. & Khan, Mehmood, 2008. "A general repeat inspection plan for dependent multicharacteristic critical components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 374-385, December.
    13. Chung-Ho Chen & Chao-Yu Chou, 2000. "Design of a CSP-1 plan based on regret-balanced criterion," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 697-701.
    14. Tirkel, Israel & Rabinowitz, Gad, 2014. "Modeling cost benefit analysis of inspection in a production line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 38-45.
    15. Gina M. Galindo-Pacheco & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Rodrigo A. Barbosa-Correa & Humberto Llinás-Solano, 2012. "Non-linear programming model for cost minimisation in a supply chain, including non-quality and inspection costs," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 301-323.
    16. Wang, Wen-Ying & Sheu, Shey-Huei & Chen, Yan-Chun & Horng, Der-Juinn, 2009. "Economic optimization of off-line inspection with rework consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 807-813, May.
    17. Shoshana Anily & Abraham Grosfeld-Nir, 2006. "An Optimal Lot-Sizing and Offline Inspection Policy in the Case of Nonrigid Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 311-323, April.
    18. Bendavid, Illana & Herer, Yale T., 2009. "Economic optimization of off-line inspection in a process that also produces non-conforming units when in control and conforming units when out of control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 139-155, May.
    19. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Guiffrida, Alfred L., 2004. "Learning curves for processes generating defects requiring reworks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 663-672, December.
    20. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Khan, Mehmood, 2010. "Managing yield by lot splitting in a serial production line with learning, rework and scrap," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 32-39, March.
    21. Colledani, Marcello & Tolio, Tullio, 2009. "Performance evaluation of production systems monitored by statistical process control and off-line inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 348-367, August.
    22. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    23. Koulamas, C, 1992. "Quality improvement through product redesign and the learning curve," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 161-168, March.
    24. Abraham Grosfeld-Nir & Yigal Gerchak & Qi-Ming He, 2000. "Manufacturing to Order with Random Yield and Costly Inspection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 761-767, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassin, Refael & Sarid, Anna, 2018. "Operations research applications of dichotomous search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 795-812.
    2. M. Jaber & Z. Givi, 2015. "Imperfect production process with learning and forgetting effects," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 129-152, January.
    3. Mahesh Kumar Jayaswal & Mandeep Mittal & Isha Sangal, 2021. "Ordering policies for deteriorating imperfect quality items with trade-credit financing under learning effect," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(1), pages 112-125, February.
    4. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    5. Aditi Khanna & Aakanksha Kishore & Biswajit Sarkar & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2018. "Supply Chain with Customer-Based Two-Level Credit Policies under an Imperfect Quality Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-35, December.
    6. Yamane, Yasuo & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Hamada, Kunihiro & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nur Bahagia, Senator & Diawati, Lucia & Cakravastia, Andi, 2015. "Developing a plant system prediction model for technology transfer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 119-128.
    7. Bimal Kumar Sett & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "Autonomated Inspection Policy for Smart Factory—An Improved Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Inventory system with defective products and investment opportunity for reducing defective proportion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 297-312, April.
    9. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    10. Jaber, M.Y. & Peltokorpi, J. & Glock, C.H. & Grosse, E.H. & Pusic, M., 2021. "Adjustment for cognitive interference enhances the predictability of the power learning curve," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Mitali Sarkar & Li Pan & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "Does the Autonomation Policy Really Help in a Smart Production System for Controlling Defective Production?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Gour Chandra Mahata, 2017. "A production-inventory model with imperfect production process and partial backlogging under learning considerations in fuzzy random environments," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 883-897, April.
    13. Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & María José Lea Plaza-Makowsky & María Alejandra Sevilla-Roca & José María Núñez-Baumert & Buddhadev Mandal, 2021. "An Inventory Model for Imperfect Quality Products with Rework, Distinct Holding Costs, and Nonlinear Demand Dependent on Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Nadeau, Marie-Claude & Kar, Ashish & Roth, Richard & Kirchain, Randolph, 2010. "A dynamic process-based cost modeling approach to understand learning effects in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 223-234, November.
    15. Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "Bayesian learning in performance. Is there any?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 263-282.
    16. Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Biswajit Sarkar & Baishakhi Ganguly & Asif Iqbal Malik & Rafael Batista & Young Hae Lee, 2018. "Optimization of sample size and order size in an inventory model with quality inspection and return of defective items," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 445-467, December.
    17. Zębala, Wojciech & Plaza, Malgorzata, 2014. "Comparative study of 3- and 5-axis CNC centers for free-form machining of difficult-to-cut material," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 345-358.
    18. Ahmed Abdel-Aleem & Mahmoud A. El-Sharief & Mohsen A. Hassan & Mohamed G. El-Sebaie, 2017. "A surface response optimization model for EPQ system with imperfect production process under rework and shortage," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(4), pages 735-751, December.
    19. Khan, Mehmood & Hussain, Matloub & Saber, Hussein M., 2016. "Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 208-214.
    20. Soosan Moradi & Mohammad Reza Gholamian & Arash Sepehri, 2023. "An inventory model for imperfect quality items considering learning effects and partial trade credit policy," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(1), pages 276-325, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:51-:d:195369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.