IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v28y2016i4d10.1007_s10696-015-9233-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of three flow line layouts with unreliable machines and profit maximization

Author

Listed:
  • Guan Wang

    (Hebei University of Science and Technology)

  • Yang Woo Shin

    (Changwon National University)

  • Dug Hee Moon

    (Changwon National University)

Abstract

Manufacturing system design is a complex challenge when a new factory is being built. Although some factories produce the same product, the layouts of the factories may be different. Manufacturing systems for automotive engines can be modelled with several types of queueing networks with finite buffers and unreliable machines. In this paper, three types of layout structures which are commonly used in automotive engine shops are compared with respect to maximizing profit that is determined by throughput and the investment cost of buffers. We assume that the service times are constant but inhomogeneous, and the time to failure and the time to repair are exponentially distributed. To solve this problem we used approximation methods which are based on aggregation and overlapping decomposition for computing performance measures, and a gradient search method for finding an optimal buffer allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan Wang & Yang Woo Shin & Dug Hee Moon, 2016. "Comparison of three flow line layouts with unreliable machines and profit maximization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 669-693, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:28:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10696-015-9233-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-015-9233-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-015-9233-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-015-9233-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Staley, Dan R. & Kim, David S., 2012. "Experimental results for the allocation of buffers in closed serial production lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 284-291.
    2. Nahas, Nabil & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Gendreau, Michel, 2014. "Selecting machines and buffers in unreliable assembly/disassembly manufacturing networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 113-126.
    3. Shi, Chuan & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2009. "An efficient buffer design algorithm for production line profit maximization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 725-740, December.
    4. Stanley Gershwin & James Schor, 2000. "Efficient algorithms for buffer space allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 117-144, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nahas, Nabil & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Gendreau, Michel, 2014. "Selecting machines and buffers in unreliable assembly/disassembly manufacturing networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 113-126.
    2. George Liberopoulos, 2020. "Comparison of optimal buffer allocation in flow lines under installation buffer, echelon buffer, and CONWIP policies," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 297-365, June.
    3. Sabry Shaaban & Tom Mcnamara & Sarah Hudson, 2015. "The impact of failure, repair and joint imbalance of processing time means & buffer sizes on the performance of unpaced production lines," Post-Print hal-01205567, HAL.
    4. Cruz, F.R.B. & Van Woensel, T. & Smith, J. MacGregor, 2010. "Buffer and throughput trade-offs in M/G/1/K queueing networks: A bi-criteria approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 224-234, June.
    5. Stefan Helber & Katja Schimmelpfeng & Raik Stolletz & Svenja Lagershausen, 2011. "Using linear programming to analyze and optimize stochastic flow lines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 193-211, January.
    6. Alfieri, Arianna & Matta, Andrea, 2012. "Mathematical programming formulations for approximate simulation of multistage production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 773-783.
    7. Kolb, Oliver & Göttlich, Simone, 2015. "A continuous buffer allocation model using stochastic processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 865-874.
    8. Shi, Chuan & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2009. "An efficient buffer design algorithm for production line profit maximization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 725-740, December.
    9. Juliane Müller & Christine Shoemaker & Robert Piché, 2014. "SO-I: a surrogate model algorithm for expensive nonlinear integer programming problems including global optimization applications," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 865-889, August.
    10. Michael Manitz, 2015. "Analysis of assembly/disassembly queueing networks with blocking after service and general service times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 417-441, March.
    11. Chang, Ping-Chen & Lin, Yi-Kuei & Chiang, Yu-Min, 2019. "System reliability estimation and sensitivity analysis for multi-state manufacturing network with joint buffers––A simulation approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 103-109.
    12. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & Shaaban, Sabry & Marsillac, Erika & Laarraf, Zouhair, 2021. "The impact of unequal processing time variability on reliable and unreliable merging line performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Federico Nuñez-Piña & Joselito Medina-Marin & Juan Carlos Seck-Tuoh-Mora & Norberto Hernandez-Romero & Eva Selene Hernandez-Gress, 2018. "Modeling of Throughput in Production Lines Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, January.
    14. G. Alon & D. Kroese & T. Raviv & R. Rubinstein, 2005. "Application of the Cross-Entropy Method to the Buffer Allocation Problem in a Simulation-Based Environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 137-151, February.
    15. Elisa Gebennini & Andrea Grassi & Cesare Fantuzzi, 2015. "The two-machine one-buffer continuous time model with restart policy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 33-64, August.
    16. Liang, Wei & Zhang, Zeqiang & Yin, Tao & Zhang, Yu & Wu, Tengfei, 2023. "Modelling and optimisation of energy consumption and profit-oriented multi-parallel partial disassembly line balancing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    17. Colledani, Marcello & Tolio, Tullio, 2009. "Performance evaluation of production systems monitored by statistical process control and off-line inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 348-367, August.
    18. Ziwei Lin & Nicla Frigerio & Andrea Matta & Shichang Du, 2021. "Multi-fidelity surrogate-based optimization for decomposed buffer allocation problems," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 223-253, March.
    19. Gregory Dobson & Hsiao-Hui Lee & Arvind Sainathan & Vera Tilson, 2012. "A Queueing Model to Evaluate the Impact of Patient "Batching" on Throughput and Flow Time in a Medical Teaching Facility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 584-599, October.
    20. Bengisu Urlu & Nesim K. Erkip, 2020. "Safety stock placement for serial systems under supply process uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 395-424, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:28:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10696-015-9233-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.