IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v124y2010i1p241-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of pull control mechanisms for unreliable homogenous transfer lines

Author

Listed:
  • Lavoie, P.
  • Gharbi, A.
  • Kenné, J.-P.

Abstract

The problem of tandem production lines composed of multiple unreliable workstations producing a single part type with holding (inventory and storage space) and shortage costs is considered. Given the numerous control mechanisms introduced in recent years, it is a difficult task to evaluate which mechanism is best suited for a specific application. Using simulation, design of experiments and response surface methodology, various homogenous lines controlled by Kanban, CONWIP and the hybrid Kanban/CONWIP control mechanisms are optimized and then compared. It is observed that the hybrid mechanism always outperforms CONWIP and Kanban when storage space and inventory costs are considered explicitly. However, hybrid is equivalent to CONWIP when storage space costs are not considered explicitly but rather aggregated with the inventory costs in the holding costs as usually found in the literature. Furthermore, with the increase of storage space cost and the number of workstations, Kanban outperforms CONWIP.

Suggested Citation

  • Lavoie, P. & Gharbi, A. & Kenné, J.-P., 2010. "A comparative study of pull control mechanisms for unreliable homogenous transfer lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 241-251, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:124:y:2010:i:1:p:241-251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(09)00425-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geraghty, John & Heavey, Cathal, 2004. "A comparison of Hybrid Push/Pull and CONWIP/Pull production inventory control policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 75-90, September.
    2. Duri, Christelle & Frein, Yannick & Lee, Hyo-Seong, 2000. "Performance evaluation and design of a CONWIP system with inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 219-229, March.
    3. Pettersen, Jan-Arne & Segerstedt, Anders, 2009. "Restricted work-in-process: A study of differences between Kanban and CONWIP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 199-207, March.
    4. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Gaury, Eric, 2003. "Short-term robustness of production management systems: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 452-465, July.
    5. Jin, Mingzhou & Luo, Yi & Eksioglu, Sandra D., 2008. "Integration of production sequencing and outbound logistics in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 766-774, June.
    6. Michael Masin & Vittal Prabhu, 2009. "AWIP: A simulation-based feedback control algorithm for scalable design of self-regulating production control systems," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 120-133.
    7. Salameh, M. K. & Abboud, N. E. & El-Kassar, A. N. & Ghattas, R. E., 2003. "Continuous review inventory model with delay in payments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 91-95, July.
    8. E G A Gaury & J P C Kleijnen & H Pierreval, 2001. "A methodology to customize pull control systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(7), pages 789-799, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hlioui, Rached & Gharbi, Ali & Hajji, Adnène, 2017. "Joint supplier selection, production and replenishment of an unreliable manufacturing-oriented supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 53-67.
    2. Xanthopoulos, A.S. & Koulouriotis, D.E. & Botsaris, P.N., 2015. "Single-stage Kanban system with deterioration failures and condition-based preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 111-122.
    3. Rivera-Gómez, Héctor & Gharbi, Ali & Kenné, Jean Pierre, 2013. "Joint production and major maintenance planning policy of a manufacturing system with deteriorating quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 575-587.
    4. Assid, M. & Gharbi, A. & Dhouib, K., 2015. "Joint production and subcontracting planning of unreliable multi-facility multi-product production systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 54-69.
    5. George Liberopoulos, 2020. "Comparison of optimal buffer allocation in flow lines under installation buffer, echelon buffer, and CONWIP policies," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 297-365, June.
    6. Rivera-Gómez, Héctor & Gharbi, Ali & Kenné, Jean-Pierre & Montaño-Arango, Oscar & Hernández-Gress, Eva Selene, 2018. "Subcontracting strategies with production and maintenance policies for a manufacturing system subject to progressive deterioration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 103-118.
    7. Hlioui, Rached & Gharbi, Ali & Hajji, Adnène, 2015. "Replenishment, production and quality control strategies in three-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 90-102.
    8. Bouslah, Bassem & Gharbi, Ali & Pellerin, Robert, 2013. "Joint optimal lot sizing and production control policy in an unreliable and imperfect manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 143-156.
    9. Gharbi, Ali & Kenné, Jean-Pierre & Kaddachi, Rawia, 2022. "Dynamic optimal control and simulation for unreliable manufacturing systems under perishable product and shelf life variability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Chan-Woo & Lee, Hyo-Seong, 2013. "Performance evaluation of a multi-product CONWIP assembly system with correlated external demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 334-344.
    2. Onyeocha, Chukwunonyelum Emmanuel & Wang, Jiayi & Khoury, Joseph & Geraghty, John, 2015. "A comparison of HK-CONWIP and BK-CONWIP control strategies in a multi-product manufacturing system," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 137-149.
    3. Lage Junior, Muris & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2010. "Variations of the kanban system: Literature review and classification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 13-21, May.
    4. Gosavi, Abhijit & Gosavi, Aparna A., 2024. "CONWIP control in the digitized world: The case of the cyber-physical jobshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Yang, Taho & Fu, Hsin-Pin & Yang, Kuang-Yi, 2007. "An evolutionary-simulation approach for the optimization of multi-constant work-in-process strategy--A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 104-114, May.
    6. Yang, Honglin & Zhuo, Wenyan & Shao, Lusheng & Talluri, Srinivas, 2021. "Mean-variance analysis of wholesale price contracts with a capital-constrained retailer: Trade credit financing vs. bank credit financing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 525-542.
    7. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    8. Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. "A deterministic EOQ model with delays in payments and price-discount offers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 509-533, January.
    9. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    10. Bertazzi, Luca, 2011. "Determining the optimal dimension of a work-in-process storage area," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 483-489, June.
    11. Liao, Jui-Jung, 2008. "An EOQ model with noninstantaneous receipt and exponentially deteriorating items under two-level trade credit," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 852-861, June.
    12. Jianxin Chen & Yong-Wu Zhou, 2017. "A Risk-Averse Newsvendor Model Under Trade Credit Contract with CVaR," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(03), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Ouyang, Liang-Yuh & Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Chuang, Kai-Wayne & Chuang, Bor-Ren, 2005. "Optimal inventory policy with noninstantaneous receipt under trade credit," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 290-300, December.
    14. Colledani, Marcello & Tolio, Tullio, 2009. "Performance evaluation of production systems monitored by statistical process control and off-line inspections," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 348-367, August.
    15. Black, Gary W. & McKay, Kenneth N. & Morton, Thomas E., 2006. "Aversion scheduling in the presence of risky jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 338-361, November.
    16. Pettersen, Jan-Arne & Segerstedt, Anders, 2009. "Restricted work-in-process: A study of differences between Kanban and CONWIP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 199-207, March.
    17. Canetta, Luca & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Glardon, Rémy, 2013. "Modelling hybrid demand (e-commerce “+” traditional) evolution: A scenario planning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 95-108.
    18. Huang, Yung-Fu & Hsu, Kuang-Hua, 2008. "An EOQ model under retailer partial trade credit policy in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 655-664, April.
    19. Debasis Das & Arindam Roy & Samarjit Kar, 2015. "A multi-warehouse partial backlogging inventory model for deteriorating items under inflation when a delay in payment is permissible," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 133-162, March.
    20. Nita H. Shah & Nidhi Raykundaliya, 2009. "Optimal Inventory Policies for Weibull Deterioration under Trade Credit in Declining Market," Indus Journal of Management & Social Science (IJMSS), Department of Business Administration, vol. 3(2), pages 11-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:124:y:2010:i:1:p:241-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.