IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v2y2015icp137-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of HK-CONWIP and BK-CONWIP control strategies in a multi-product manufacturing system

Author

Listed:
  • Onyeocha, Chukwunonyelum Emmanuel
  • Wang, Jiayi
  • Khoury, Joseph
  • Geraghty, John

Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of the Hybrid Kanban Constant Work-In-Process control strategy and Basestock Kanban Constant Work-In-Process control strategy operating Shared Kanban Allocation Policy (S-KAP) and Dedicated Kanban Allocation Policy (D-KAP) in a multi-product serial flow line. We explored the effect of an increase of product types on the WIP inventory in the system. A simulation-based optimisation technique was used in determining the optimal settings for the strategies. The strategies were compared via pairwise comparison technique and Nelson’s ranking and selection procedure. S-KAP responds quicker to demand than D-KAP. BK-CONWIP outperforms HK-CONWIP in a serial manufacturing system. It was shown that an increase in the number of product-type increases the number of PAC and WIP inventory.

Suggested Citation

  • Onyeocha, Chukwunonyelum Emmanuel & Wang, Jiayi & Khoury, Joseph & Geraghty, John, 2015. "A comparison of HK-CONWIP and BK-CONWIP control strategies in a multi-product manufacturing system," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 137-149.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:2:y:2015:i:c:p:137-149
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2015.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716015000159
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2015.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yacob Khojasteh & Ryo Sato, 2015. "Selection of a pull production control system in multi-stage production processes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(14), pages 4363-4379, July.
    2. C. Duri & Y. Frein & M. Di Mascolo, 2000. "Comparison among three pull control policies: kanban, base stock, and generalized kanban," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 41-69, January.
    3. Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Myreshka & Hirotani, Daisuke, 2005. "Comparing CONWIP, synchronized CONWIP, and Kanban in complex supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 25-40, January.
    4. Geraghty, John & Heavey, Cathal, 2004. "A comparison of Hybrid Push/Pull and CONWIP/Pull production inventory control policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 75-90, September.
    5. Barry L. Nelson & Julie Swann & David Goldsman & Wheyming Song, 2001. "Simple Procedures for Selecting the Best Simulated System When the Number of Alternatives is Large," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 950-963, December.
    6. Mark L. Spearman & Michael A. Zazanis, 1992. "Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 521-532, June.
    7. Izak Duenyas, 1994. "A Simple Release Policy for Networks of Queues with Controllable Inputs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1162-1171, December.
    8. Park, Chan-Woo & Lee, Hyo-Seong, 2013. "Performance evaluation of a multi-product CONWIP assembly system with correlated external demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 334-344.
    9. Pettersen, Jan-Arne & Segerstedt, Anders, 2009. "Restricted work-in-process: A study of differences between Kanban and CONWIP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 199-207, March.
    10. Hum, Sin-Hoon & Lee, Chee-Kwong, 1998. "JIT Scheduling Rules: a Simulation Evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 381-395, June.
    11. E G A Gaury & J P C Kleijnen & H Pierreval, 2001. "A methodology to customize pull control systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(7), pages 789-799, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Chan-Woo & Lee, Hyo-Seong, 2013. "Performance evaluation of a multi-product CONWIP assembly system with correlated external demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 334-344.
    2. Yang, Taho & Fu, Hsin-Pin & Yang, Kuang-Yi, 2007. "An evolutionary-simulation approach for the optimization of multi-constant work-in-process strategy--A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 104-114, May.
    3. Lavoie, P. & Gharbi, A. & Kenné, J.-P., 2010. "A comparative study of pull control mechanisms for unreliable homogenous transfer lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 241-251, March.
    4. Lage Junior, Muris & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2010. "Variations of the kanban system: Literature review and classification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 13-21, May.
    5. Peng Lin & Leidi Shen & Zhiheng Zhao & George Q. Huang, 2019. "Graduation manufacturing system: synchronization with IoT-enabled smart tickets," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2885-2900, December.
    6. Nha-Nghi Cruz & Hans Daduna, 2019. "Optimal capacity allocation in a production–inventory system with base stock," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 329-344, June.
    7. Pettersen, Jan-Arne & Segerstedt, Anders, 2009. "Restricted work-in-process: A study of differences between Kanban and CONWIP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 199-207, March.
    8. Othmane Benmoussa, 2022. "Improving Replenishment Flows Using Simulation Results: A Case Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Gosavi, Abhijit & Gosavi, Aparna A., 2024. "CONWIP control in the digitized world: The case of the cyber-physical jobshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Gong, Qiguo & Yang, Yuru & Wang, Shouyang, 2014. "Information and decision-making delays in MRP, KANBAN, and CONWIP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 208-213.
    11. Plaza, Malgorzata & David, Iulian & Shirazi, Farid, 2018. "Management of inventory under market fluctuations the case of a Canadian high tech company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 215-227.
    12. Li, Hui & Liu, Liming, 2006. "Production control in a two-stage system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 887-904, October.
    13. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Meijboom, Kars, 2021. "A qualitative exploration of the wood product supply chain – investigating the possibilities and desirability of an increased demand orientation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Jung, Jung Woo & Lee, Young Hae, 2010. "Heuristic algorithms for production and transportation planning through synchronization of a serial supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 433-447, April.
    15. Wilhelm, W. E. & Som, Pradip, 1998. "Analysis of a single-stage, single-product, stochastic, MRP-controlled assembly system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 74-93, July.
    16. Sigrún Andradóttir & Seong‐Hee Kim, 2010. "Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(5), pages 403-421, August.
    17. Kumar Satyam & Ananth Krishnamurthy, 2013. "Performance analysis of CONWIP systems with batch size constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 85-114, October.
    18. Patrick Dallasega & Erwin Rauch, 2017. "Sustainable Construction Supply Chains through Synchronized Production Planning and Control in Engineer-to-Order Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Fei, Xin & Gülpınar, Nalân & Branke, Jürgen, 2019. "Efficient solution selection for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 918-929.
    20. Yucesan, Enver & de Groote, Xavier, 2000. "Lead times, order release mechanisms, and customer service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 118-130, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:2:y:2015:i:c:p:137-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.